NYJetsFan.com Forums: Ea Sports Jets Ratings - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

Jets start voluntary offseason programs today
santana Icon : (22 April 2014 - 03:47 PM) dat Chelsea tight butt hole
santana Icon : (22 April 2014 - 03:48 PM) 0-0
Jetsman05 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 03:48 PM) whatever that means
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 03:59 PM) Some talk that Dennard might slide to round 2 now
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 04:00 PM) Roby and Fuller are rising.
Jetsman05 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 04:00 PM) Roby absolute physical freak but really inconsistent as a player
Jetsman05 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 04:01 PM) loved him going into school but never grew into the player i thought he would become
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 04:01 PM) I don't want Roby, afraid we take him
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 04:01 PM) f***ing draft should be this week, not 2 weeks from now
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 04:02 PM) I rather go get a CB like Phillip Gaines in round 3.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 04:02 PM) 1-Odell Beckham Jr WR, 2-Jace Amaro TE, 3-Phillip Gaines CB.
Jetsman05 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 04:04 PM) Where is Marcus Roberson being projected
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 04:05 PM) round 2 I think
Jetsman05 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 04:06 PM) he'll be a solid pro
santana Icon : (22 April 2014 - 04:18 PM) solid pro
santana Icon : (22 April 2014 - 04:19 PM) boston. strong.
Jetsman05 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 06:14 PM) you're a clown
Jetsman05 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 06:14 PM) just for the record
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 06:27 PM) FIRE RAUL
Jetsman05 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 06:30 PM) agreed
Jetsman05 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 06:30 PM) EJ > Raul
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 06:38 PM) lmao
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 06:38 PM) I wouldn't go that far
Jetsman05 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 06:39 PM) true
Jetsman05 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 06:39 PM) but its closer by the day
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (22 April 2014 - 08:13 PM) LET'S GO RANGERS!
santana Icon : (22 April 2014 - 08:51 PM) Boo rangers
santana Icon : (22 April 2014 - 08:51 PM) boo the Knicks
santana Icon : (22 April 2014 - 08:51 PM) Let's go wizards!
santana Icon : (22 April 2014 - 08:52 PM) SANTANA DESERVES BETTER
santana Icon : (22 April 2014 - 08:56 PM) Just landed in Reagan jumping on the wizards bandwagon taxi right out the gate
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 01:47 PM) Tanaka looks good so far
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 03:45 PM) The title race is REAL
canuckfan Icon : (Yesterday, 04:36 PM) Teh Raptors!!!!!!!!!!
canuckfan Icon : (Yesterday, 04:37 PM) Let's go Habs!
Jetsman05 Icon : (Today, 05:18 AM) Pineda looks good so far
santana Icon : (Today, 07:18 AM) Pineda solid pro
santana Icon : (Today, 07:19 AM) Pineda went Boston strong on Boston
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 07:57 AM) He has, except he is stupid for putting the shit on his neck. He has to hide that better.
Chaos Icon : (Today, 09:14 AM) @Bischoff_Scott: Per a source, the #Lions are having discussions about moving #Suh before the draft to move up as high as possible in the first round.
Chaos Icon : (Today, 09:14 AM) now that would be a fairly big move
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 09:46 AM) If they trade Suh to get Watkins, I would laugh. That doesn't really make their team better, they already have a high yardage passing attack
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 09:47 AM) They have the best WR in football and they signed Tate who will be a excellent #2 to Johnson
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 09:53 AM) too many smokes screens. f*** the extra 2 weeks of this shit, the draft should be tonight!
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 01:04 PM) The media is so dumb, Jon Gieger Revis' best friend tweets a pic from the Jets website and says it's revis, and all of the media goes along with it making fun of the Jets when it was really Jeremy Kerleyr.
Resize Shouts Area

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Ea Sports Jets Ratings WTF.... Jets ratings messed up

#1 User is offline   LeonhardSkynyrd36 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,845
  • Joined: 29-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ATL GA
  • Interests:Progression

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 09 June 2005 - 10:09 PM

Offense - 86 Defense - 76 OVRALL - 81

now i know that these arent final, but why is it that every year the jets offense is also overated and our defense is underrated..... well im just stating this. kinda pisses me off rtfm.gif
ColesReturns87
0

#2 User is offline   extmenace Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,637
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tallahassee / Sarasota, FL

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 09 June 2005 - 11:50 PM

i saw that somewhere...no way in hell that will be true. EA is somewhat accurate with ratings. we should be around an 88-90 team.

"I'm glad that the Gillette field was soft and messy
since I spent so much time down on it."-Tom Brady


17 POINTS!
0

#3 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 09 June 2005 - 11:54 PM

I posted this a while back, look in the Game part of the forums.
0

#4 User is offline   The Reverend Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,181
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 04:49 AM

WTF!?
Our defense was ranked 6th overall!
WE DESERVE BETTER
Sal Paolantonio commenting on the difference in the Ryan and Mangini atmospheres in the building:
"It's like going from Alcatraz to Dorney Park."

It is better to destroy than create what is meaningless, so the picture will not be finished.
erikcoleman#26
0

#5 User is offline   BringtheJetsHome2NY Icon

  • Free Agent
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 44
  • Joined: 22-April 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 02:06 PM

what they do is they do it be what ranking they give the players. As you all know, our offence would have a lot of high 80 and some 90 players, so it has to be ranked high. Besides vilma, ellis and abe, i dont think that they could justify making anyone else in that class, so the defence has to be low
0

#6 User is offline   Chadforpresidentin08 Icon

  • 05 M. I. P. Award/06 Teen MVP Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,019
  • Joined: 01-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois (Originally from New York)
  • Interests:Jets and Yanks

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:01 PM

What about Barton, Coleman, and Robertson? Hobson isn't the worst player either, nor is Barrett.
"You ask, what is our aim?... It is victory, victory at all cost" Winston Churchill.
Member since March 25, 2005.
0

#7 User is offline   S-Dubb Icon

  • 2008 Best Insider Award
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 31,128
  • Joined: 02-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:---
  • Interests:Hardcore Jets & Knicks fan - Gym rat - health and nutrition - family man and proud father.

    Twitter: @NYJETSFANCOM

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:04 PM

In the old game we were rated 84 offence and 83 defence after the updates took place.

I wouldn't worry about these ranking because non of them are final. Also they do updates as players get better or get injured and so on.
0

#8 User is offline   Chadforpresidentin08 Icon

  • 05 M. I. P. Award/06 Teen MVP Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,019
  • Joined: 01-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois (Originally from New York)
  • Interests:Jets and Yanks

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:12 PM

But the worst is Martin won't be a 90 overall I bet and then after year 1 he'll drop down by like 2-3 overall points and his speed will be like 85, Chrebet will have the same thing.
"You ask, what is our aim?... It is victory, victory at all cost" Winston Churchill.
Member since March 25, 2005.
0

#9 User is offline   S-Dubb Icon

  • 2008 Best Insider Award
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 31,128
  • Joined: 02-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:---
  • Interests:Hardcore Jets & Knicks fan - Gym rat - health and nutrition - family man and proud father.

    Twitter: @NYJETSFANCOM

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 06:18 PM

they have to make Martin even better in the new game. Just because he was the rushing leader. I think he was 90 speed 99 awareness 89 agility. I think they will keep his speed the same but add attribute points to his agility and break tackle. I don't matter to me martin will be good either way. I run the ball a ton anyway. They way Curtis is now is pretty good. He only has to get better.
0

#10 User is offline   Chadforpresidentin08 Icon

  • 05 M. I. P. Award/06 Teen MVP Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,019
  • Joined: 01-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois (Originally from New York)
  • Interests:Jets and Yanks

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 06:43 PM

Well in 2005 he was like 89 when you first get him, awareness 92, speed 87, and agility is like 84. I usually pass, but I still get a good 1,200 yards out of Martin.
"You ask, what is our aim?... It is victory, victory at all cost" Winston Churchill.
Member since March 25, 2005.
0

#11 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 06:45 PM

Guys I posted the other teams ratings a while back, if you wanna check them out go here:

http://nyjetsfan.com...p?showtopic=913
0

#12 User is offline   Miller_Light#34 Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 260
  • Joined: 21-May 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 11:06 PM

i remember. dubb and i know how these rattings work on Xbox live and the jets had the favoriteable Numbers so i'm not all worryed yet
0

#13 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 11:10 PM

When the players ratings come out, don't worry I will have most of the jets ratings.
0

#14 User is offline   LeonhardSkynyrd36 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,845
  • Joined: 29-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ATL GA
  • Interests:Progression

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 19 June 2005 - 03:39 AM

Just stating the fact that C-Mart was 77 OVRL in ESPN 2K5 lol wow what idiots
blowup.gif blowup.gif blowup.gif
ColesReturns87
0

#15 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 19 June 2005 - 03:26 PM

QUOTE (ColesReturns87 @ Jun 19 2005, 09:14 AM)
Just stating the fact that C-Mart was 77 OVRL in ESPN 2K5 lol wow what idiots
blowup.gif  blowup.gif  blowup.gif


That is probably one huge reason why Madden is still here, and ESPN is not. Madden does have bad ratings, but they are no where near as bad as ESPN. ESPN's rating system is a joke.
0

#16 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,539
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 June 2005 - 01:23 PM

actuall if u update the stats he is a 90. thats why u need xbox live. 2k had the best stats. madden has gannon faster then mcnair
Get it done MT
Posted Image
0

#17 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 21 June 2005 - 02:08 PM

QUOTE (Jetsfan115 @ Jun 21 2005, 06:58 PM)
actuall if u update the stats he is a 90. thats why u need xbox live. 2k had the best stats. madden has gannon faster then mcnair


90 in my opinion is still a little worse for the person who "WON" the rushing title. If you win a rushing title, you should be rated higher then some people, sure he is older then some people. But, he "BEAT" the younger people in rushing yards... SO what I am saying is...

Madden>2K
0

#18 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,539
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 June 2005 - 02:29 PM

more carries and a better o-line then most of them ( we had a top 3 o-line) no ranking will ever be perfect but 2003 was the last better madden and only slightly. 2k4 and 2k5 were way better.
Get it done MT
Posted Image
0

#19 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 21 June 2005 - 05:52 PM

QUOTE (Jetsfan115 @ Jun 21 2005, 08:04 PM)
more carries and a better o-line then most of them ( we had a top 3 o-line) no ranking will ever be perfect but 2003 was the last better madden and only slightly. 2k4 and 2k5 were way better.


I never liked those game so of course I have to disagree, Compare the franchises for one thing. Franchise is probably the thing mostly everybody plays, Madden kills 2K in that category, obviously. In my opinion 2k5 was crap, but 2k4 was pretty good. You know what I am gonna say. It's obvious what i am going to say...

Madden>2k

Which is why 2K cannot make anymore football video games, and Madden can. See the difference?
0

#20 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,539
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 22 June 2005 - 08:55 AM

the franchise in 2k5 was way better. 2K can't make games anymore because maden paid big time money to buy out the NFL license. it had nothing to do with quality. donald trump could have bought it and made his own game and madden would be no more
Get it done MT
Posted Image
0

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users