NYJetsFan.com Forums: Ea Sports Jets Ratings - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

FANTASY FOOTBALL SIGN UP: http://nyjetsfan.com...ndpost&p=357345
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (13 August 2016 - 12:09 PM) So 1 preseason game after being out for a while, you want to just dump him?
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (13 August 2016 - 12:09 PM) His coverage wasn't even that bad, he was there just didn't make the plays. Allen Robinson is a stud too
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (13 August 2016 - 12:10 PM) Lets see how he does in future games, rather him make mistakes in a vanilla preseason game
RetireChrebet Icon : (13 August 2016 - 12:10 PM) It's hard for me to get excited about Forte. I have a feeling Bilal will have a breakout year. Likely do to increased workload and improved Oline
RetireChrebet Icon : (13 August 2016 - 12:11 PM) Due
ganggreen2003 Icon : (13 August 2016 - 12:15 PM) hell let's cut geno too
RetireChrebet Icon : (13 August 2016 - 12:16 PM) I agree. Trade Genome
RetireChrebet Icon : (13 August 2016 - 12:18 PM) trade Geno, take anything you can get for him, even if it's a 7th round pick. The future is Petty or Hack. If not draft another QB in a couple years.
ganggreen2003 Icon : (13 August 2016 - 12:21 PM) what team would want a QB who got suckerpunched by a 3rd stringer last year in training camp
azjetfan Icon : (13 August 2016 - 05:03 PM) The Cowboys may trade a player or a pick for Geno. With Romo being brittle and them having zero depth I could see them giving something.
azjetfan Icon : (13 August 2016 - 05:04 PM) I'm really not an anti Geno guy though. If he can mature he can play in this league. He has the physical talents but lacks the drive.
santana Icon : (13 August 2016 - 06:06 PM) I doubt anyone trades for geno
santana Icon : (13 August 2016 - 06:07 PM) jets would get like a 6th rounder for him his value would be better on the bench
Chaos Icon : (13 August 2016 - 06:25 PM) yes, yes, let's cut the former 9th overall pick because he had a poor preseason game and deal with a no good $4M cap hit.
Chaos Icon : (13 August 2016 - 06:26 PM) who would you sign to be #2? or do you seriously think petty is good for the job?
santana Icon : (13 August 2016 - 06:37 PM) the backup is always ready for the job is the jets fan mantra
santana Icon : (13 August 2016 - 06:46 PM) I need a backup
santana Icon : (13 August 2016 - 06:46 PM) WHERES MY BACKUP
vjdbbq Icon : (15 August 2016 - 07:52 AM) Would someone scratch bobrob42 ?
ROBJETS Icon : (16 August 2016 - 03:33 AM) Az..... Apparently you didn't watch the Cowboys preseason game. Romo didn't play and their current backup played a good bit with starters and backups and he looked great. Almost like a veteran. They would have 0 interest in trading for Geno now.
vjdbbq Icon : (16 August 2016 - 01:57 PM) ROB is back ; ,how's the ass ?
Chaos Icon : (18 August 2016 - 12:18 PM) we need 1 more for fantasy football!
Jetsfan115 Icon : (19 August 2016 - 06:27 PM) game stream http://ifirstrowus.e...-york-jets.html
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2016 - 07:06 PM) defense is playing like shit
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2016 - 09:00 PM) Geno still sucks
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2016 - 09:08 PM) Petty 9/15 120 yards and a TD
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2016 - 09:27 PM) Sudfeld sucks 2 fumbles
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2016 - 09:28 PM) petty had then in the red zone going for the go ahead score
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2016 - 09:31 PM) OK we at the wash 42
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2016 - 09:32 PM) WOOOO TD!!
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2016 - 09:32 PM) f*** you Geno. Lets keep Petty
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2016 - 09:40 PM) Petty 15/24 230 yards and 2 TDs
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2016 - 09:40 PM) Geno 6/13 1Int
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2016 - 09:46 PM) BOOOO we lose
santana Icon : (20 August 2016 - 09:29 AM) I was at the game and I thought fitz looked like crapola
vjdbbq Icon : (21 August 2016 - 01:01 PM) You were looking at GENO !!!!!!!!!!!
santana Icon : (21 August 2016 - 02:24 PM) you have a crush on geno don't you
santana Icon : (21 August 2016 - 02:24 PM) it's ok
ganggreen2003 Icon : (21 August 2016 - 07:10 PM) WTF is taking so long to cut geno and milliner
ganggreen2003 Icon : (21 August 2016 - 07:10 PM) they both are bums and need to go away
Chaos Icon : (22 August 2016 - 08:29 AM) it makes zero sense to cut them.
Chaos Icon : (22 August 2016 - 08:30 AM) this isn't fantasy. cutting players has an impact on the cap.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 August 2016 - 10:20 AM) becuase we need them
Chaos Icon : (Yesterday, 11:25 AM) DRAFT UPDATE:

Date: Tuesday August 30, 2016
Time: 8:00 pm
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 02:20 PM) cap stuff http://nyjetsfan.com...showtopic=38899
Resize Shouts Area

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Ea Sports Jets Ratings WTF.... Jets ratings messed up

#1 User is offline   LeonhardSkynyrd36 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,854
  • Joined: 29-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ATL GA
  • Interests:Progression

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 09 June 2005 - 10:09 PM

Offense - 86 Defense - 76 OVRALL - 81

now i know that these arent final, but why is it that every year the jets offense is also overated and our defense is underrated..... well im just stating this. kinda pisses me off rtfm.gif
ColesReturns87
0

#2 User is offline   extmenace Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,647
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tallahassee / Sarasota, FL

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 09 June 2005 - 11:50 PM

i saw that somewhere...no way in hell that will be true. EA is somewhat accurate with ratings. we should be around an 88-90 team.

"I'm glad that the Gillette field was soft and messy
since I spent so much time down on it."-Tom Brady


17 POINTS!
0

#3 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 09 June 2005 - 11:54 PM

I posted this a while back, look in the Game part of the forums.
0

#4 User is offline   The Reverend Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,190
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 04:49 AM

WTF!?
Our defense was ranked 6th overall!
WE DESERVE BETTER
Sal Paolantonio commenting on the difference in the Ryan and Mangini atmospheres in the building:
"It's like going from Alcatraz to Dorney Park."

It is better to destroy than create what is meaningless, so the picture will not be finished.
erikcoleman#26
0

#5 User is offline   BringtheJetsHome2NY Icon

  • Free Agent
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 44
  • Joined: 22-April 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 02:06 PM

what they do is they do it be what ranking they give the players. As you all know, our offence would have a lot of high 80 and some 90 players, so it has to be ranked high. Besides vilma, ellis and abe, i dont think that they could justify making anyone else in that class, so the defence has to be low
0

#6 User is offline   Chadforpresidentin08 Icon

  • 05 M. I. P. Award/06 Teen MVP Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,029
  • Joined: 01-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois (Originally from New York)
  • Interests:Jets and Yanks

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:01 PM

What about Barton, Coleman, and Robertson? Hobson isn't the worst player either, nor is Barrett.
"You ask, what is our aim?... It is victory, victory at all cost" Winston Churchill.
Member since March 25, 2005.
0

#7 User is offline   S-Dubb Icon

  • 2008 Best Insider Award
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 31,145
  • Joined: 02-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:---
  • Interests:Hardcore Jets & Knicks fan - Gym rat - health and nutrition - family man and proud father.

    Twitter: @NYJETSFANCOM

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:04 PM

In the old game we were rated 84 offence and 83 defence after the updates took place.

I wouldn't worry about these ranking because non of them are final. Also they do updates as players get better or get injured and so on.
0

#8 User is offline   Chadforpresidentin08 Icon

  • 05 M. I. P. Award/06 Teen MVP Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,029
  • Joined: 01-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois (Originally from New York)
  • Interests:Jets and Yanks

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:12 PM

But the worst is Martin won't be a 90 overall I bet and then after year 1 he'll drop down by like 2-3 overall points and his speed will be like 85, Chrebet will have the same thing.
"You ask, what is our aim?... It is victory, victory at all cost" Winston Churchill.
Member since March 25, 2005.
0

#9 User is offline   S-Dubb Icon

  • 2008 Best Insider Award
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 31,145
  • Joined: 02-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:---
  • Interests:Hardcore Jets & Knicks fan - Gym rat - health and nutrition - family man and proud father.

    Twitter: @NYJETSFANCOM

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 06:18 PM

they have to make Martin even better in the new game. Just because he was the rushing leader. I think he was 90 speed 99 awareness 89 agility. I think they will keep his speed the same but add attribute points to his agility and break tackle. I don't matter to me martin will be good either way. I run the ball a ton anyway. They way Curtis is now is pretty good. He only has to get better.
0

#10 User is offline   Chadforpresidentin08 Icon

  • 05 M. I. P. Award/06 Teen MVP Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,029
  • Joined: 01-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois (Originally from New York)
  • Interests:Jets and Yanks

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 06:43 PM

Well in 2005 he was like 89 when you first get him, awareness 92, speed 87, and agility is like 84. I usually pass, but I still get a good 1,200 yards out of Martin.
"You ask, what is our aim?... It is victory, victory at all cost" Winston Churchill.
Member since March 25, 2005.
0

#11 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 06:45 PM

Guys I posted the other teams ratings a while back, if you wanna check them out go here:

http://nyjetsfan.com...p?showtopic=913
0

#12 User is offline   Miller_Light#34 Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 260
  • Joined: 21-May 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 11:06 PM

i remember. dubb and i know how these rattings work on Xbox live and the jets had the favoriteable Numbers so i'm not all worryed yet
0

#13 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 11:10 PM

When the players ratings come out, don't worry I will have most of the jets ratings.
0

#14 User is offline   LeonhardSkynyrd36 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,854
  • Joined: 29-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ATL GA
  • Interests:Progression

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 19 June 2005 - 03:39 AM

Just stating the fact that C-Mart was 77 OVRL in ESPN 2K5 lol wow what idiots
blowup.gif blowup.gif blowup.gif
ColesReturns87
0

#15 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 19 June 2005 - 03:26 PM

QUOTE (ColesReturns87 @ Jun 19 2005, 09:14 AM)
Just stating the fact that C-Mart was 77 OVRL in ESPN 2K5 lol wow what idiots
blowup.gif  blowup.gif  blowup.gif


That is probably one huge reason why Madden is still here, and ESPN is not. Madden does have bad ratings, but they are no where near as bad as ESPN. ESPN's rating system is a joke.
0

#16 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,861
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 June 2005 - 01:23 PM

actuall if u update the stats he is a 90. thats why u need xbox live. 2k had the best stats. madden has gannon faster then mcnair
0

#17 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 21 June 2005 - 02:08 PM

QUOTE (Jetsfan115 @ Jun 21 2005, 06:58 PM)
actuall if u update the stats he is a 90. thats why u need xbox live. 2k had the best stats. madden has gannon faster then mcnair


90 in my opinion is still a little worse for the person who "WON" the rushing title. If you win a rushing title, you should be rated higher then some people, sure he is older then some people. But, he "BEAT" the younger people in rushing yards... SO what I am saying is...

Madden>2K
0

#18 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,861
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 June 2005 - 02:29 PM

more carries and a better o-line then most of them ( we had a top 3 o-line) no ranking will ever be perfect but 2003 was the last better madden and only slightly. 2k4 and 2k5 were way better.
0

#19 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 21 June 2005 - 05:52 PM

QUOTE (Jetsfan115 @ Jun 21 2005, 08:04 PM)
more carries and a better o-line then most of them ( we had a top 3 o-line) no ranking will ever be perfect but 2003 was the last better madden and only slightly. 2k4 and 2k5 were way better.


I never liked those game so of course I have to disagree, Compare the franchises for one thing. Franchise is probably the thing mostly everybody plays, Madden kills 2K in that category, obviously. In my opinion 2k5 was crap, but 2k4 was pretty good. You know what I am gonna say. It's obvious what i am going to say...

Madden>2k

Which is why 2K cannot make anymore football video games, and Madden can. See the difference?
0

#20 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,861
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 22 June 2005 - 08:55 AM

the franchise in 2k5 was way better. 2K can't make games anymore because maden paid big time money to buy out the NFL license. it had nothing to do with quality. donald trump could have bought it and made his own game and madden would be no more
0

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users