NYJetsFan.com Forums: Alan Branch - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

JETS SUPER BOWL THIS WEEKEND
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:17 PM) Is Paul Hackett back? 3 and 8 and we runa draw?
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 02:18 PM) yes that is true too, we need to get rid of Idzik because I don't trust him hiring a new HC, using our top pick well, or using our cap space
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:18 PM) great coverage
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:19 PM) SACKED!!!!
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 02:19 PM) RICHARDSON
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:19 PM) SHELDON!!!!
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 02:19 PM) Richardson is gonna get paid, him and Wilkerson will cost big bucks
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:20 PM) The STUD Sheldon
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 02:20 PM) 7.5 sacks for Richardson
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:20 PM) now we need to get aggressive in the 2nd half
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:21 PM) if Rex wasn't so disinterested in the Offense I'd consider him to return but he could give a flying f*** about the O so I want him gone
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:22 PM) and those sweater vests are the most hideous things in the world
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 02:22 PM) if only we could keep REx as a DC
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:23 PM) he'll be the next HC of the Chicago Bears
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 02:26 PM) That'll be interesting, bring back the monsters of midway
jetfan4life12 Icon : (Today, 02:28 PM) It's nice to see the jets giving 100% every play. Why can't they do that every week
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:29 PM) cause we don't have the talent
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:29 PM) we are mediocre
jetfan4life12 Icon : (Today, 02:29 PM) 0099 Harvin is another Devon Hester
jetfan4life12 Icon : (Today, 02:30 PM) similar to Hester
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 02:36 PM) Harvin is way better than Hester
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:37 PM) damnit
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:37 PM) we should of had that INT
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:38 PM) good flag
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:38 PM) on back to back plays
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:41 PM) Harvin is a way better receiver than Hester. Not even close
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:44 PM) we are moving the chains
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 02:46 PM) of course we are going to win this...
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:48 PM) settle for 3
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:49 PM) only a 6 point lead
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:49 PM) we can still lose
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:49 PM) since we got the 1 redzone td out of the way in the beginning of the game we ain't scoring another redzone td the rest of the game we are only allotted 1 a game
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:56 PM) is anyone's feed coming in broken on their TV?
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:58 PM) we are going to let them take the lead
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:58 PM) how frustrating
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:59 PM) we held them to 3 amazing
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:04 PM) you knew that was coming
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 03:04 PM) LMAO Geno throws the INT
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:05 PM) he had to throw a bad INT
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:07 PM) why didn't Harris run that back
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:08 PM) that ball never hit the ground
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:08 PM) that is not being heads up
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:08 PM) that ball bounced off Pace
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:08 PM) and right into Harris' arms
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:11 PM) damnit why couldn't that play break that fuckers leg
Resize Shouts Area

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

Alan Branch

#1 User is offline   JetsMan4012 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,159
  • Joined: 30-October 05
  • Location:here
  • Interests:poker, rapping, football,baseball,basketball,video games

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 16 January 2007 - 06:27 PM

i think we should draft him if we can, think about it, we've all been saying we need a NT, i would had said this earlier but wasnt sure if he was gonna be in the draft or not, i mean i like him cause hes from michigan but hes also nice as hell, and hes BIG, what do u guys think, u think we'll have a shot at drafting him
"They think we spellin iverson when the beef all done cuz you be on I-Vs in the E-R son"- 40 Cal
" Winning isn't everything; its the only thing"



RIP Uncle Bob 5/12/06
0

#2 User is offline   VaNDelaYInDusTrIEs Icon

  • 06 R.O.Y. Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 12-September 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Back in the Jerz

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 16 January 2007 - 06:31 PM

Well he's ranked 7th on Mel Kiper's big board. So I'm gonna guess not...
0

#3 User is offline   penningtonpays Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,292
  • Joined: 30-March 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 16 January 2007 - 06:45 PM

i wish, but he is a top 10 pick anyway you look at it.

IPB Image
0

#4 User is offline   extmenace Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,642
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tallahassee / Sarasota, FL

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 16 January 2007 - 06:59 PM

probably a top 5 pick....but we would have to unload some picks and trade for the position to get him which im not in favor of. we have a 1st and a really high 2nd and another decent 2nd pick. Id rather have 3 players....

"I'm glad that the Gillette field was soft and messy
since I spent so much time down on it."-Tom Brady


17 POINTS!
0

#5 User is offline   S-Dubb Icon

  • 2008 Best Insider Award
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 31,145
  • Joined: 02-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:---
  • Interests:Hardcore Jets & Knicks fan - Gym rat - health and nutrition - family man and proud father.

    Twitter: @NYJETSFANCOM

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 16 January 2007 - 07:04 PM

We all wish!
0

#6 User is offline   JetsMan4012 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,159
  • Joined: 30-October 05
  • Location:here
  • Interests:poker, rapping, football,baseball,basketball,video games

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 16 January 2007 - 07:11 PM

i know i might be wrong but who really needs a NT that bad before us, i say i might be wrong cause im not really sure of the draft order
"They think we spellin iverson when the beef all done cuz you be on I-Vs in the E-R son"- 40 Cal
" Winning isn't everything; its the only thing"



RIP Uncle Bob 5/12/06
0

#7 User is offline   HurricaneJet32 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,700
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Location:New York

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 16 January 2007 - 07:18 PM

Thing is...he isn't really a NT. Plenty of teams will take him to be a dominant DT in any system. I know he has plenty of size to be a NT. But he isn't really a space eaterand would best utilized as a DE in the 3-4. It's scary to think how good Alan Branch could be as a DE in the 3-4. And while I'm sure he could play NT...it wouldn't be worth trading up that far to put him in an unnatural position...

Actually...I've heard some rumblings that Branch might start dropping because he isn't really a run stopper...and isn't really a fantastic pass rusher...plus he doesn't even have anything noteworthy in the stat column. I try not to look at stats...but put it all together he may end up a mid first rounder. Problem is...there isn't another DT who could really beat him out for first DT taken...so I suppose he stays Top 10.

If he did fall...for whatever reason...I think he'd be a good pickup...but as a DE. Hell...I might be willing to give up my Marshawn Lynch man crush if Branch fell...haha. But it won't happen...so the man love continues...
Posted Image
0

#8 User is offline   kenxnice Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 946
  • Joined: 22-September 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 16 January 2007 - 07:36 PM

i've been asking for this guys since day one but i doubt we'd land him, all the other team that goes ahead of us will most likely look to get him
"can you feel whats about to happen on this field, can ya'll feel thay?"
0

#9 User is offline   JetsMan4012 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,159
  • Joined: 30-October 05
  • Location:here
  • Interests:poker, rapping, football,baseball,basketball,video games

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 16 January 2007 - 09:17 PM

well if we cant get this guy and we dont get a RB this year, MIKE HART IN 08!
"They think we spellin iverson when the beef all done cuz you be on I-Vs in the E-R son"- 40 Cal
" Winning isn't everything; its the only thing"



RIP Uncle Bob 5/12/06
0

#10 User is offline   penningtonpays Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,292
  • Joined: 30-March 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 16 January 2007 - 10:05 PM

the more and more i see the patriots on tv or read about them, the more i want a player like seymour on our team. lets hope your right and his stock does drop and we somehow pick him up. he has the potential to be better than seymour.

IPB Image
0

#11 User is offline   HurricaneJet32 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,700
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Location:New York

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 16 January 2007 - 10:19 PM

QUOTE (penningtonpays @ Jan 16 2007, 10:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
the more and more i see the patriots on tv or read about them, the more i want a player like seymour on our team. lets hope your right and his stock does drop and we somehow pick him up. he has the potential to be better than seymour.


That's the truth right there!
Posted Image
0

#12 User is offline   tipceey Icon

  • Drafted Rookie
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 145
  • Joined: 13-January 07
  • Location:Brooklyn or SUNY binghamton

  • NFL Team:

Posted 17 January 2007 - 08:03 AM

i hate to burst the bubble but we already have a guy just as good as seymour in 2006

Shaun Ellis ---------------------Richard Seymour
tackles-58 ---------------- tackles-40
solo-37 --------------------- solo-22
asst-21---------------------- asst-18
sacks-5 ----------------------- sacks-4
pass Def-3 ------------------- pass Def-7
int- 0 ---------------------------- int-1
ff-1 --------------------------- ff-0
fumblerec-0 ---------------------- fumblegarec-1
games-16 ----------------------- games-16




Shaun ellis had just as good if not better numbers than seymour in the same number of games and this is his first year in a 3-4....we can hate on him because he wont be the 10 sack guy he was in herm's scheme but i give him alot of credit because most high paid defensive ends like abraham or strahan would of cried and asked for a trade because their stats would drop but he played his ass off. But hey i would take both guys in a heart beat.


http://www.sportslin...ayerpage/187387
http://www.sportslin...ayerpage/187387



\
You Dont Run On the JETS. Vilma Will KIll YOU
0

#13 User is offline   Kentucky Jet Icon

  • Pro Bowl
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 481
  • Joined: 22-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lexington, ky and Ormand Beach, fl
  • Interests:NY Jets and Tony Bennett music!

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 17 January 2007 - 08:11 AM

QUOTE (tipceey @ Jan 17 2007, 08:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i hate to burst the bubble but we already have a guy just as good as seymour

Shaun Ellis Richard Seymour
tackles-58 ---------------- tackles-40
solo-37 --------------------- solo-22
asst-21 asst-18
sacks-5 sacks-4
pass Def-3 pass Def-7
int- 0 int-1
ff-1 ff-0
fumblerec-0 fumblegarec-1
games-16 games-16
Shaun ellis had just as good if not better numbers than seymour in the same number of games and this is his first year in a 3-4....we can hate on him because he wont be the 10 sack guy he was in herm's scheme but i give him alot of credit because most high paid defensive ends like abraham or strahan would of cried and asked for a trade because their stats would drop but he played his ass off. But hey i would take both guys in a heart beat.
http://www.sportslin...ayerpage/187387
http://www.sportslin...ayerpage/187387
\

wow! That is eye opening. I thought that ELIS had a quiet year. The guy actually had a very nice season!
Our time has come! Rex will bring us a Super Bowl victory! Go Jets!
0

#14 User is offline   HurricaneJet32 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,700
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Location:New York

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 17 January 2007 - 11:02 AM

QUOTE (tipceey @ Jan 17 2007, 08:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i hate to burst the bubble but we already have a guy just as good as seymour in 2006

Shaun Ellis ---------------------Richard Seymour
tackles-58 ---------------- tackles-40
solo-37 --------------------- solo-22
asst-21---------------------- asst-18
sacks-5 ----------------------- sacks-4
pass Def-3 ------------------- pass Def-7
int- 0 ---------------------------- int-1
ff-1 --------------------------- ff-0
fumblerec-0 ---------------------- fumblegarec-1
games-16 ----------------------- games-16
Shaun ellis had just as good if not better numbers than seymour in the same number of games and this is his first year in a 3-4....we can hate on him because he wont be the 10 sack guy he was in herm's scheme but i give him alot of credit because most high paid defensive ends like abraham or strahan would of cried and asked for a trade because their stats would drop but he played his ass off. But hey i would take both guys in a heart beat.
http://www.sportslin...ayerpage/187387
http://www.sportslin...ayerpage/187387
\


Do me a favor and burn the stat book...

Stats will never show what a defensive linemen does in the 3-4. Shaun Ellis didn't control the line of scrimmage the way Seymour did. Ellis did a good job, no doubt, but he is part of the run defense problem...not the biggest part, obviously, but a part of it.
Posted Image
0

#15 User is offline   Smedsthejet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 8,267
  • Joined: 10-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 17 January 2007 - 11:49 AM

QUOTE (JetsMan4012 @ Jan 17 2007, 12:46 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i know i might be wrong but who really needs a NT that bad before us, i say i might be wrong cause im not really sure of the draft order


Thing is one team in the top 15 who doesn't neccessarilly require a NT will take him simply because of his talent. Last year Carolina had DeShaun Foster on their roster but that didn't stop them taking DeAngelo Williams same with the Saints and Bush as they had McAllister although passing on Bush would have been a mistake (isn't that right Texans?).

QUOTE (HurricaneJet32 @ Jan 17 2007, 04:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Do me a favor and burn the stat book...

Stats will never show what a defensive linemen does in the 3-4. Shaun Ellis didn't control the line of scrimmage the way Seymour did. Ellis did a good job, no doubt, but he is part of the run defense problem...not the biggest part, obviously, but a part of it.


Exactly. Seymour would have commanded more double teams than Ellis did simply because of his reputation around the league as one of the best DEs in the league.
0

#16 User is offline   magnus Icon

  • Rookie
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: 01-April 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 17 January 2007 - 12:40 PM

in all honesty id rather have Lamar Woodley to play DE instead of Branch, Woodley could play that OLB/DE pos that thomas plays. seriously anyone else watch michigan play this guy is a monster
0

#17 User is offline   VaNDelaYInDusTrIEs Icon

  • 06 R.O.Y. Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 12-September 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Back in the Jerz

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 17 January 2007 - 12:54 PM

I could be wrong, but I don't think Woodley would play DE in the 3-4. He's 6-2 and 268 lbs. Compare that to Bryan Thomas who is 6-4 and 266 lbs. Woodley is the perfect size for an OLB in the 3-4, assuming he's fast enough.
0

#18 User is offline   DewayneDontSign Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,979
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Location:Long Island

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 17 January 2007 - 01:09 PM

QUOTE (VaNDelaYInDusTrIEs @ Jan 17 2007, 01:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I could be wrong, but I don't think Woodley would play DE in the 3-4. He's 6-2 and 268 lbs. Compare that to Bryan Thomas who is 6-4 and 266 lbs. Woodley is the perfect size for an OLB in the 3-4, assuming he's fast enough.


yes he would be an OLB
0

#19 User is offline   VILMAmazing51 Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 294
  • Joined: 13-November 06
  • Location:Dallas, PA

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 17 January 2007 - 01:35 PM

QUOTE (HurricaneJet32 @ Jan 17 2007, 11:37 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Do me a favor and burn the stat book...

Stats will never show what a defensive linemen does in the 3-4. Shaun Ellis didn't control the line of scrimmage the way Seymour did. Ellis did a good job, no doubt, but he is part of the run defense problem...not the biggest part, obviously, but a part of it.


iagree.gif

RIGHT ON THE MONEY!!! Ellis is no seymor...bottom line.

FINALLY!!!! A REAL BIG BOY!!!
0

#20 User is offline   tipceey Icon

  • Drafted Rookie
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 145
  • Joined: 13-January 07
  • Location:Brooklyn or SUNY binghamton

  • NFL Team:

Posted 17 January 2007 - 07:24 PM

QUOTE (VILMAmazing51 @ Jan 17 2007, 02:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
iagree.gif

RIGHT ON THE MONEY!!! Ellis is no seymor...bottom line.



You cant fault ellis for a couple of reasons the biggest of which was the lack of a NT....Of all the 3-4's in the league we are the only one that doesnt have a real NT. Teams could collapse 2 or 3 blockers on him because he was the only guy on the line causing any disruption......Robertson had an OK year but his mobility is seriously limited by a degenerative knee condition which alot of pro's think might end his career earlier than expected and Kimo as we all know is awful and shouldnt have been starting on an nfl roster last year. Give him Wilfork and ty warren type players and another year in the 3-4 system and we'll see who the most dominant DE in the 3-4 really is. I'll admit that the numbers dont tell the whole truth but if it wasnt for Ellis getting blocks collapsed on him the way they did the sacks that rhodes and thomas got wouldnt be there.....he basically was the NT because he occupied the space.......another thing is this was his first year in the 3-4 so i think he deserves credit for putting up numbers and not gripes about a change in philosophy which pretty much an high paid DE in the league would have done.........numbers may not tell the whole truth but they dont lie either
You Dont Run On the JETS. Vilma Will KIll YOU
0

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users