NYJetsFan.com Forums: Ea Sports Jets Ratings - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

ALL WE NEEDED WAS A FIELD GOAL
santana Icon : (17 October 2014 - 06:25 PM) its deff a good move for the jets they will probably manage to sell some tickets for the rest of the year
518-JeTS-FaN Icon : (17 October 2014 - 06:26 PM) nice to see a move finally, hopefully he can stay healthy and give us a spark
santana Icon : (17 October 2014 - 06:27 PM) put a spork in that salad
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (17 October 2014 - 06:39 PM) Should have gotten desean Jackson this offsesson
518-JeTS-FaN Icon : (17 October 2014 - 06:43 PM) yup
V DidDy 210 Icon : (17 October 2014 - 06:44 PM) wowsers
V DidDy 210 Icon : (17 October 2014 - 06:44 PM) i'm still crying from last night
V DidDy 210 Icon : (17 October 2014 - 06:44 PM) and on top of that the jets fuccked me again by getting harvin before he could play this week lol
santana Icon : (17 October 2014 - 07:33 PM) stop your crying THERE'S NO CRYING AT NYJETSFAN
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (18 October 2014 - 08:12 AM) Jets are cutting David Nelson
jetfan4life12 Icon : (18 October 2014 - 09:15 AM) the probably could have had Santana Moss cheap. He has been healthy all season but inactive every week
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (18 October 2014 - 11:06 AM) I'd prefer to keep him and cut Salas
santana Icon : (18 October 2014 - 11:36 AM) you would of thought david nelson would of been more of a redzone threat by this point. hes a big dude.
santana Icon : (18 October 2014 - 11:39 AM) real madrid shooting practice continues
santana Icon : (18 October 2014 - 12:02 PM) arent there some other names that could have been cut instead
santana Icon : (18 October 2014 - 12:03 PM) chris owusu
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (18 October 2014 - 01:21 PM) Salas is better than Nelson
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (18 October 2014 - 01:22 PM) Nelson is rated as the worst wr in football this season
santana Icon : (18 October 2014 - 01:34 PM) he has to better than owusu or graham
518-JeTS-FaN Icon : (18 October 2014 - 04:36 PM) I posted an article about harvin and some of his issues. Dude seems like a wack job with talent. Hope rex can corral this guy or he could make the locker room implode
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 11:43 AM) Wasn't demean Jackson vilified as a gang affiliated street thug during his Philly release
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 12:31 PM) damn football sunday and no ones on
Canuck Jet Icon : (Yesterday, 01:00 PM) Yeah, cuz Rex is so good at developing offensive talent; 0 - Infinity
Canuck Jet Icon : (Yesterday, 01:02 PM) Harvin is Holmes 2.0, except punches for general bitchiness and annoying first down celebrations.
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 01:03 PM) i'm not buying into the media nonsense
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 01:06 PM) Harvin is a playmaker, we needed one.
Canuck Jet Icon : (Yesterday, 01:15 PM) I hope he tears it up as a Jet, but he's been tossed from 2 teams in as many years and hasn't cracked 1000 yds in his career. I wouldn't be surprised if he had CTE from those brutal head hits, hence the aggression of late.
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 01:18 PM) I was tossed from two t-ball teams and some people still say i was the best hitter on timid deer lane
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 01:20 PM) bills RBs dropping like flies
Canuck Jet Icon : (Yesterday, 01:20 PM) We'll only really know when the autopsy his brain. Stay tuned! Guy never should have played the Super Bowl after the 2 concussions he suffered against the Saints.
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 01:26 PM) whitehurst clipboard jesus
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 02:54 PM) brian shottenheimer must of lost his mind haha
V DidDy 210 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:11 PM) fuckin orton
V DidDy 210 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:11 PM) how does he keep doing it?
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 04:53 PM) Jack Daniels
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 06:25 PM) murray horse
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 08:28 PM) GOD DAMN IT ANQUAN
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 08:29 PM) what is this amateur hour!?!?!?
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 08:29 PM) come on!
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 08:43 PM) Manning just broke the Passing TD record
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 08:44 PM) :boredom: we could of had him a few years ago
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 08:44 PM) but at least he didn't break it on us
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 08:45 PM) I don't think he wanted to be here
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 08:46 PM) I don't really care for passing records being broken. Qbs now have a lot of rules in their favor
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 08:46 PM) I mean even the catch that got them into the redzone was a PI call that wouldnt of been called when favre played
Resize Shouts Area

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Ea Sports Jets Ratings WTF.... Jets ratings messed up

#1 User is offline   LeonhardSkynyrd36 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,847
  • Joined: 29-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ATL GA
  • Interests:Progression

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 09 June 2005 - 10:09 PM

Offense - 86 Defense - 76 OVRALL - 81

now i know that these arent final, but why is it that every year the jets offense is also overated and our defense is underrated..... well im just stating this. kinda pisses me off rtfm.gif
ColesReturns87
0

#2 User is offline   extmenace Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,640
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tallahassee / Sarasota, FL

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 09 June 2005 - 11:50 PM

i saw that somewhere...no way in hell that will be true. EA is somewhat accurate with ratings. we should be around an 88-90 team.

"I'm glad that the Gillette field was soft and messy
since I spent so much time down on it."-Tom Brady


17 POINTS!
0

#3 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 09 June 2005 - 11:54 PM

I posted this a while back, look in the Game part of the forums.
0

#4 User is offline   The Reverend Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,181
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 04:49 AM

WTF!?
Our defense was ranked 6th overall!
WE DESERVE BETTER
Sal Paolantonio commenting on the difference in the Ryan and Mangini atmospheres in the building:
"It's like going from Alcatraz to Dorney Park."

It is better to destroy than create what is meaningless, so the picture will not be finished.
erikcoleman#26
0

#5 User is offline   BringtheJetsHome2NY Icon

  • Free Agent
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 44
  • Joined: 22-April 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 02:06 PM

what they do is they do it be what ranking they give the players. As you all know, our offence would have a lot of high 80 and some 90 players, so it has to be ranked high. Besides vilma, ellis and abe, i dont think that they could justify making anyone else in that class, so the defence has to be low
0

#6 User is offline   Chadforpresidentin08 Icon

  • 05 M. I. P. Award/06 Teen MVP Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,019
  • Joined: 01-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois (Originally from New York)
  • Interests:Jets and Yanks

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:01 PM

What about Barton, Coleman, and Robertson? Hobson isn't the worst player either, nor is Barrett.
"You ask, what is our aim?... It is victory, victory at all cost" Winston Churchill.
Member since March 25, 2005.
0

#7 User is offline   S-Dubb Icon

  • 2008 Best Insider Award
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 31,145
  • Joined: 02-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:---
  • Interests:Hardcore Jets & Knicks fan - Gym rat - health and nutrition - family man and proud father.

    Twitter: @NYJETSFANCOM

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:04 PM

In the old game we were rated 84 offence and 83 defence after the updates took place.

I wouldn't worry about these ranking because non of them are final. Also they do updates as players get better or get injured and so on.
0

#8 User is offline   Chadforpresidentin08 Icon

  • 05 M. I. P. Award/06 Teen MVP Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,019
  • Joined: 01-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois (Originally from New York)
  • Interests:Jets and Yanks

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:12 PM

But the worst is Martin won't be a 90 overall I bet and then after year 1 he'll drop down by like 2-3 overall points and his speed will be like 85, Chrebet will have the same thing.
"You ask, what is our aim?... It is victory, victory at all cost" Winston Churchill.
Member since March 25, 2005.
0

#9 User is offline   S-Dubb Icon

  • 2008 Best Insider Award
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 31,145
  • Joined: 02-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:---
  • Interests:Hardcore Jets & Knicks fan - Gym rat - health and nutrition - family man and proud father.

    Twitter: @NYJETSFANCOM

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 06:18 PM

they have to make Martin even better in the new game. Just because he was the rushing leader. I think he was 90 speed 99 awareness 89 agility. I think they will keep his speed the same but add attribute points to his agility and break tackle. I don't matter to me martin will be good either way. I run the ball a ton anyway. They way Curtis is now is pretty good. He only has to get better.
0

#10 User is offline   Chadforpresidentin08 Icon

  • 05 M. I. P. Award/06 Teen MVP Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,019
  • Joined: 01-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois (Originally from New York)
  • Interests:Jets and Yanks

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 06:43 PM

Well in 2005 he was like 89 when you first get him, awareness 92, speed 87, and agility is like 84. I usually pass, but I still get a good 1,200 yards out of Martin.
"You ask, what is our aim?... It is victory, victory at all cost" Winston Churchill.
Member since March 25, 2005.
0

#11 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 06:45 PM

Guys I posted the other teams ratings a while back, if you wanna check them out go here:

http://nyjetsfan.com...p?showtopic=913
0

#12 User is offline   Miller_Light#34 Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 260
  • Joined: 21-May 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 11:06 PM

i remember. dubb and i know how these rattings work on Xbox live and the jets had the favoriteable Numbers so i'm not all worryed yet
0

#13 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 11:10 PM

When the players ratings come out, don't worry I will have most of the jets ratings.
0

#14 User is offline   LeonhardSkynyrd36 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,847
  • Joined: 29-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ATL GA
  • Interests:Progression

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 19 June 2005 - 03:39 AM

Just stating the fact that C-Mart was 77 OVRL in ESPN 2K5 lol wow what idiots
blowup.gif blowup.gif blowup.gif
ColesReturns87
0

#15 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 19 June 2005 - 03:26 PM

QUOTE (ColesReturns87 @ Jun 19 2005, 09:14 AM)
Just stating the fact that C-Mart was 77 OVRL in ESPN 2K5 lol wow what idiots
blowup.gif  blowup.gif  blowup.gif


That is probably one huge reason why Madden is still here, and ESPN is not. Madden does have bad ratings, but they are no where near as bad as ESPN. ESPN's rating system is a joke.
0

#16 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,604
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 June 2005 - 01:23 PM

actuall if u update the stats he is a 90. thats why u need xbox live. 2k had the best stats. madden has gannon faster then mcnair
Get it done MT
Posted Image
0

#17 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 21 June 2005 - 02:08 PM

QUOTE (Jetsfan115 @ Jun 21 2005, 06:58 PM)
actuall if u update the stats he is a 90. thats why u need xbox live. 2k had the best stats. madden has gannon faster then mcnair


90 in my opinion is still a little worse for the person who "WON" the rushing title. If you win a rushing title, you should be rated higher then some people, sure he is older then some people. But, he "BEAT" the younger people in rushing yards... SO what I am saying is...

Madden>2K
0

#18 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,604
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 June 2005 - 02:29 PM

more carries and a better o-line then most of them ( we had a top 3 o-line) no ranking will ever be perfect but 2003 was the last better madden and only slightly. 2k4 and 2k5 were way better.
Get it done MT
Posted Image
0

#19 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 21 June 2005 - 05:52 PM

QUOTE (Jetsfan115 @ Jun 21 2005, 08:04 PM)
more carries and a better o-line then most of them ( we had a top 3 o-line) no ranking will ever be perfect but 2003 was the last better madden and only slightly. 2k4 and 2k5 were way better.


I never liked those game so of course I have to disagree, Compare the franchises for one thing. Franchise is probably the thing mostly everybody plays, Madden kills 2K in that category, obviously. In my opinion 2k5 was crap, but 2k4 was pretty good. You know what I am gonna say. It's obvious what i am going to say...

Madden>2k

Which is why 2K cannot make anymore football video games, and Madden can. See the difference?
0

#20 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,604
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 22 June 2005 - 08:55 AM

the franchise in 2k5 was way better. 2K can't make games anymore because maden paid big time money to buy out the NFL license. it had nothing to do with quality. donald trump could have bought it and made his own game and madden would be no more
Get it done MT
Posted Image
0

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users