NYJetsFan.com Forums: Interesting Stat About Nugent And Other Elite Kickers. - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

Azjetfan is the nyjetsfan #1 pick
azjetfan Icon : (02 May 2015 - 03:20 PM) Tom Pettys brother
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 03:22 PM) Jets should take Collins with one of their 7th rounders if there
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 03:22 PM) He has more upside for a 7th rounder than anyone else
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 03:22 PM) He can start right away at RT
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 03:29 PM) He said he won't sign
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 03:32 PM) so he doesn't want to be drafted?
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 03:33 PM) If Collins doesn't get drafted, he can't enter next years draft. He can only if he is drafted and sits out. So I guess he has to go undrafted
V DidDy 210 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 03:41 PM) going undrafted makes the most sense for collins
V DidDy 210 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 03:41 PM) but for teams, drafting him and dealing with his holdout makes more sense
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:19 PM) Zac Stacy was traded to us for our 7th
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:21 PM) Jets also drafted a NT with our other 7th
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:21 PM) 6'4 330 DL who is very strong
V DidDy 210 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:25 PM) zac stacy for a 7th
V DidDy 210 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:25 PM) well can't complain about that
MikeGangGree... Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:29 PM) So we have 4 rbs now
V DidDy 210 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:31 PM) still would have rather taken a runner on collins but i can't complain with depth
V DidDy 210 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:32 PM) i mean they can't expect to carry 4 rb though no?
azjetfan Icon : (02 May 2015 - 05:50 PM) Collins would have been a waste. He would not have signed. At least we have something to show for our pick. Worst case scenario is we trade or release one of our backs.
azjetfan Icon : (02 May 2015 - 05:56 PM) I know it's hard to tell without seeing a win loss record yet but this regime seems really on point.
azjetfan Icon : (02 May 2015 - 05:56 PM) For the first time in my life I can say I feel comfortable with the people making the decisions.
azjetfan Icon : (02 May 2015 - 05:57 PM) I was close with Parcells but he seemed like a short term fixer and didn't care about the long term
MikeGangGree... Icon : (02 May 2015 - 06:57 PM) SUCK FOR THE DUCK
MikeGangGree... Icon : (02 May 2015 - 06:57 PM) .......oh wait
santana Icon : (03 May 2015 - 01:13 AM) Well that was a disappointment
Chadforpresi... Icon : (03 May 2015 - 01:24 AM) I like getting Stacy for our 7th rounder, assuming he can handle the fact he won't be a feature back (yikes)
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:31 AM) I like the trade, hes a quality back and adds more depth to our backfield
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:32 AM) Macc has pretty much killed it this offseason
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:32 AM) He has turned this roster around, he has added talent and competition all over.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:33 AM) We still aren't great at QB, but our overall football team is good. We have a realistic shot at making a playoff run
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:33 AM) We may have the best defense in football. We have a great DL and secondary, that is gonna be tough on offenses when you can stop the run, pressure the QB, and blanket the receivers
ganggreen2003 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:23 PM) ok now it's time for this team to take all this talent and do something anything below a 10-6 season will be a disappointment
ganggreen2003 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:24 PM) the only still glaring issue is QB
ganggreen2003 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:25 PM) we got the WR problem solved, we got probably one of the best Defenses in the game and we have addressed the OL but QB will still be the glaring issue
Chaos Icon : (Yesterday, 09:34 AM) jets cleaning house
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 05:57 PM) I'm excited about this year. Could be a good year for the Jets.
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 07:32 PM) weird how they cleaned house in the scouting department after such a successful draft and off-season so far
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 07:36 PM) I assume they didn't bring much to the table
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 08:41 PM) Have to clean the table
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 09:08 PM) Fuck the rangers
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 09:08 PM) face off dominated holtby gtfo
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 09:18 PM) La'el Collins is meeting with Rex Ryan tonight
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Today, 12:31 AM) FIVE FINGER DEATH PUNCH!
Chaos Icon : (Today, 05:41 AM) Damn that'd make up for the Bills not having a first rounder
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 10:59 AM) They didn't sign him yet. It's just a visit.
santana Icon : (Today, 01:49 PM) Uefa time
Resize Shouts Area

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

Interesting Stat About Nugent And Other Elite Kickers.

#1 User is online   Jetsfan0099 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 17,116
  • Joined: 30-July 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Jersey

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 01:40 PM

Nugent had a career high of 88.9% kicking accuratcy this year. Thats his career high, now lets show some of the elite kickers in the leagues high.
David Akers-88.2
Adam Vinatari-90
Neil Rackers-95.2
Jeff Wilkens-92.9 (though dome kickers are high because of the no wind factor)
Mort Anderson-88.6
John Carney-92.0
Jason Elam-93.1
Now look they are all kinda close, but remember here that these are their best in their careers, when Nugent has only had 2 years. Now lets look at those same kickers in their 2nd years.
David Akers-50.0
Adam Vinatari-86.2
Neil Rackers-60.7
Jeff Wilkins-92.3
Mort Anderson-75.0
John Carney-0.0
Jason Elam-81.1
Mike Nugent-88.9
Now see Nugent had a better year, then almost all of the elite kickers in their 2nd year. Just thought it was pretty interesting how Nugent compares with them.
Posted Image
0

#2 User is offline   jet456 Icon

  • Drafted Rookie
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 113
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:worcester ma,by way of harlem

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 01:49 PM

drinks.gif wow!!great post,he's only going to get better,i truly beleive that. yahoo.gif
QUOTE (Jetsfan0099 @ Jan 20 2007, 08:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Nugent had a career high of 88.9% kicking accuratcy this year. Thats his career high, now lets show some of the elite kickers in the leagues high.
David Akers-88.2
Adam Vinatari-90
Neil Rackers-95.2
Jeff Wilkens-92.9 (though dome kickers are high because of the no wind factor)
Mort Anderson-88.6
John Carney-92.0
Jason Elam-93.1
Now look they are all kinda close, but remember here that these are their best in their careers, when Nugent has only had 2 years. Now lets look at those same kickers in their 2nd years.
David Akers-50.0
Adam Vinatari-86.2
Neil Rackers-60.7
Jeff Wilkins-92.3
Mort Anderson-75.0
John Carney-0.0
Jason Elam-81.1
Mike Nugent-88.9
Now see Nugent had a better year, then almost all of the elite kickers in their 2nd year. Just thought it was pretty interesting how Nugent compares with them.

0

#3 User is offline   JetsMan4012 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,159
  • Joined: 30-October 05
  • Location:here
  • Interests:poker, rapping, football,baseball,basketball,video games

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 02:21 PM

exactly, i was thinking something along the same lines, hes doing good for a 2nd year kicker
"They think we spellin iverson when the beef all done cuz you be on I-Vs in the E-R son"- 40 Cal
" Winning isn't everything; its the only thing"



RIP Uncle Bob 5/12/06
0

#4 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,758
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 03:03 PM

now all the nugent haters are gonna become nugent lovers.
0

#5 User is offline   JetsMan4012 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,159
  • Joined: 30-October 05
  • Location:here
  • Interests:poker, rapping, football,baseball,basketball,video games

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 04:26 PM

QUOTE (Jetsfan115 @ Jan 20 2007, 03:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
now all the nugent haters are gonna become nugent lovers.

i was a nugent lover originally, after awhile i started to doubt him just a little though but now im not worried really, especially seeing these stats, i mean i thought that it was like that but didnt know it was for a fact like it
"They think we spellin iverson when the beef all done cuz you be on I-Vs in the E-R son"- 40 Cal
" Winning isn't everything; its the only thing"



RIP Uncle Bob 5/12/06
0

#6 User is offline   matt x Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,133
  • Joined: 22-July 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:upstate ny (work in L.I, NJ,&CT.
  • Interests:family, jets, mets, grateful dead.

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 04:49 PM

How could you not hate Nugent after he missed that extra point?
Posted Image
0

#7 User is offline   priortothesnap Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 239
  • Joined: 12-January 06

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 05:45 PM

Don't forget, if the Jets had a QB that could score TDs in the red zone, Nugent's FG % wouldn't be that high.

All kickers choke once in awhile, Nugent is better than most, but there's no excuse for the short kickoffs and the field position we consistently give up.
0

#8 User is online   Jetsfan0099 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 17,116
  • Joined: 30-July 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Jersey

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 05:47 PM

QUOTE (priortothesnap @ Jan 20 2007, 06:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Don't forget, if the Jets had a QB that could score TDs in the red zone, Nugent's FG % wouldn't be that high.

Well of coarse it wouldnt. It would be 0.0 if the Jets could score Tds in the redzone, because they wouldnt need to take fieldgoals. crazy.gif
Posted Image
0

#9 User is offline   priortothesnap Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 239
  • Joined: 12-January 06

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 06:04 PM

QUOTE (Jetsfan0099 @ Jan 20 2007, 06:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Well of coarse it wouldnt. It would be 0.0 if the Jets could score Tds in the redzone, because they wouldnt need to take fieldgoals. crazy.gif



Keyword(s) = red zone. Right? You did catch that? Just checkin' ---- many posters here don't know how to read.

He'd still need to kick FGs beyond the red zone.
0

#10 User is offline   JetsMan4012 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,159
  • Joined: 30-October 05
  • Location:here
  • Interests:poker, rapping, football,baseball,basketball,video games

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 06:10 PM

QUOTE (matt x @ Jan 20 2007, 05:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
How could you not hate Nugent after he missed that extra point?

u do know its not like hes the only one ever to miss an extra point
"They think we spellin iverson when the beef all done cuz you be on I-Vs in the E-R son"- 40 Cal
" Winning isn't everything; its the only thing"



RIP Uncle Bob 5/12/06
0

#11 User is offline   Fatman Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,540
  • Joined: 14-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 06:16 PM

He's a good kicker who should be around for the next few years. it took him a little longer than people expected for him to be a good kicker but he is now so thats that.

Thanks for the Memories
0

#12 User is online   Jetsfan0099 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 17,116
  • Joined: 30-July 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Jersey

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 09:58 PM

QUOTE (priortothesnap @ Jan 20 2007, 06:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Keyword(s) = red zone. Right? You did catch that? Just checkin' ---- many posters here don't know how to read.

He'd still need to kick FGs beyond the red zone.

Dude, he kicked a 54 yarder, a 52 yarder, he was 4-4 on 40-49 yards, 2-3 on 50+ yarders. I did read the redzone, but the guy only missed 3 kicks this year, and 1 extra point. Idk why you are argueing about him being bad. He is 10-12 from 30-39. And its not like his field goals come in the red zone, he made most of his field goals in the 30+ range.
Posted Image
0

#13 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,758
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 10:04 PM

QUOTE (priortothesnap @ Jan 20 2007, 03:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Keyword(s) = red zone. Right? You did catch that? Just checkin' ---- many posters here don't know how to read.

He'd still need to kick FGs beyond the red zone.


He's 6-7 on 40+ and the one miss was a 52 yarder
0

#14 User is offline   HarlemHxC814 Icon

  • 06 Best Avatar Award / N.O.P. GUARD
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 5,161
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 10:30 PM

QUOTE (Jetsfan115 @ Jan 20 2007, 10:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
He's 6-7 on 40+ and the one miss was a 52 yarder


If I'm not mistaken, wasn't the 52 yarder a pressure kick. I mean 6/7 from 40+ is good but yeah, he did make a game winner against the Fish, but it's those pressure kicks from (at least) 45+ yards that we need to see him hit. Like OhFive said, he gets his name back, but still needs to do a little bit more to prove himself. Give me a good pressure situation out of Nuge
Posted Image
0

#15 User is offline   Chadforpresidentin08 Icon

  • 05 M. I. P. Award/06 Teen MVP Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,029
  • Joined: 01-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois (Originally from New York)
  • Interests:Jets and Yanks

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 10:34 PM

That's some damn fine researching there JetsFan0099. drinks.gif
I think the knack on Nugent as a whole has been kicking off, which we all know. I'm gonna go out on a limb when I say he didn't record a singe TB this year, not good, and no way do I want one kicker to kick FGs and some other guy kickoff. That's ridiculous. As soon as he does that, it'll be 100% love from everyone here I bet.
"You ask, what is our aim?... It is victory, victory at all cost" Winston Churchill.
Member since March 25, 2005.
0

#16 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,758
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 10:50 PM

QUOTE (HarlemHellfighterNYC @ Jan 20 2007, 08:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If I'm not mistaken, wasn't the 52 yarder a pressure kick. I mean 6/7 from 40+ is good but yeah, he did make a game winner against the Fish, but it's those pressure kicks from (at least) 45+ yards that we need to see him hit. Like OhFive said, he gets his name back, but still needs to do a little bit more to prove himself. Give me a good pressure situation out of Nuge


he didn't miss any presure kicks this year
0

#17 User is offline   priortothesnap Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 239
  • Joined: 12-January 06

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 January 2007 - 01:48 AM

QUOTE (Jetsfan0099 @ Jan 20 2007, 10:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Dude, he kicked a 54 yarder, a 52 yarder, he was 4-4 on 40-49 yards, 2-3 on 50+ yarders. I did read the redzone, but the guy only missed 3 kicks this year, and 1 extra point. Idk why you are argueing about him being bad. He is 10-12 from 30-39. And its not like his field goals come in the red zone, he made most of his field goals in the 30+ range.



Uh, who's arguing? First off, I was taking a cynical shot at Pennington. Secondly, I was making a perfectly valid point about Nug's FG% dropping if you remove all the red zone chip-shot padding. He's 6/7 total outside the red zone (39 yds or longer). That's 85.7%, not 88.9%. When you said his FG% would be 00.0% if we scored only TDs in the red zone, that's true for the red, but not for his overall %. Just clarifying your unclear post, which seemed to imply either:

A. He only kicks FGs within the redzone, or
B. If he attempts anything longer, he'll miss them all

Anyway, 85.7% is still good, I wasn't knocking his FGs to begin with. Nugent made 20 red zone attempts, 23 if you count the WC. Not sure how many red zone appearances NY made in total, perhaps one of you hotshots can look that up.....
0

#18 User is offline   priortothesnap Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 239
  • Joined: 12-January 06

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 January 2007 - 02:14 AM

QUOTE (Chadforpresidentin08 @ Jan 20 2007, 11:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think the knack on Nugent as a whole has been kicking off, which we all know.


Which you all know? That's a friggin' joke. When I first posted it, all you butt-fumes got your knickers in a twist, and heaved fur balls for a good week.

QUOTE
I'm gonna go out on a limb when I say he didn't record a singe TB this year.


It's hard to remember them, but he did do it twice. Like I said earlier, he must've had the help of a category-five hurricane on those occasions.
0

#19 User is offline   priortothesnap Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 239
  • Joined: 12-January 06

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 January 2007 - 03:04 AM

QUOTE (Jetsfan0099 @ Jan 20 2007, 10:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
. He is 10-12 from 30-39. And its not like his field goals come in the red zone, he made most of his field goals in the 30+ range.


20 of his 27 FG attempts this season were from the red zone. Nugent uses an 8-yd snap, so anything 38-yds or less is red zone for him.
0

#20 User is offline   Smedsthejet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 8,278
  • Joined: 10-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 January 2007 - 09:42 AM

QUOTE (Jetsfan0099 @ Jan 21 2007, 03:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
No your wrong. Redzone is from the 20 yard line in. Thats the redzone. So that 20 for 27, is wrong, because he taken more out of the redzone then that, and if you take every kickers redzone shots then every kicker would drop. He still made them, so w/e.


Isn't a redzone attempt from whenever the offense has got inside the 20-yard line. So an attempt where the LOS is at the 20 yard line, probably a 38 yarder, would be counted as a redzone FG attempt?
If so then even if the offense got inside the 20, lost some yards, say to the 25 yard line, and settled for a FG with the LOS from there, that would be a redzone FG attempt.
0

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users