NYJetsFan.com Forums: Lateral Not Fumble - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

JETS SUPER BOWL THIS WEEKEND
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 02:19 PM) RICHARDSON
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:19 PM) SHELDON!!!!
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 02:19 PM) Richardson is gonna get paid, him and Wilkerson will cost big bucks
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:20 PM) The STUD Sheldon
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 02:20 PM) 7.5 sacks for Richardson
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:20 PM) now we need to get aggressive in the 2nd half
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:21 PM) if Rex wasn't so disinterested in the Offense I'd consider him to return but he could give a flying f*** about the O so I want him gone
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:22 PM) and those sweater vests are the most hideous things in the world
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 02:22 PM) if only we could keep REx as a DC
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:23 PM) he'll be the next HC of the Chicago Bears
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 02:26 PM) That'll be interesting, bring back the monsters of midway
jetfan4life12 Icon : (Today, 02:28 PM) It's nice to see the jets giving 100% every play. Why can't they do that every week
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:29 PM) cause we don't have the talent
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:29 PM) we are mediocre
jetfan4life12 Icon : (Today, 02:29 PM) 0099 Harvin is another Devon Hester
jetfan4life12 Icon : (Today, 02:30 PM) similar to Hester
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 02:36 PM) Harvin is way better than Hester
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:37 PM) damnit
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:37 PM) we should of had that INT
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:38 PM) good flag
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:38 PM) on back to back plays
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:41 PM) Harvin is a way better receiver than Hester. Not even close
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:44 PM) we are moving the chains
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 02:46 PM) of course we are going to win this...
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:48 PM) settle for 3
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:49 PM) only a 6 point lead
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:49 PM) we can still lose
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:49 PM) since we got the 1 redzone td out of the way in the beginning of the game we ain't scoring another redzone td the rest of the game we are only allotted 1 a game
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:56 PM) is anyone's feed coming in broken on their TV?
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:58 PM) we are going to let them take the lead
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:58 PM) how frustrating
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:59 PM) we held them to 3 amazing
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:04 PM) you knew that was coming
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 03:04 PM) LMAO Geno throws the INT
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:05 PM) he had to throw a bad INT
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:07 PM) why didn't Harris run that back
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:08 PM) that ball never hit the ground
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:08 PM) that is not being heads up
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:08 PM) that ball bounced off Pace
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:08 PM) and right into Harris' arms
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:11 PM) damnit why couldn't that play break that fuckers leg
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:15 PM) and they score a TD
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:16 PM) Rex might get fined for that f*** THIS SHIT he just got caught saying after the call was not reversed
jetfan4life12 Icon : (Today, 03:16 PM) who cares if he gets fined
jetfan4life12 Icon : (Today, 03:16 PM) he can afford it
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Lateral Not Fumble

#1 User is offline   TheGreenCoachesClub Icon

  • Pro Bowl
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 525
  • Joined: 25-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Westfield NJ

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 04:35 PM

since that play never came infront of the line of scrimmage, and it was initself a backwards pass, wouldn't that be considered a lateral? then wouldn't that then be challangeable?
0

#2 User is offline   socaljetsfan Icon

  • Pro Bowl
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 519
  • Joined: 01-August 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 04:37 PM

Ya that play makes no sense, but good teams answer back like that.

"No sugar? Damn. Y'all ain't never got two things that match. Either y'all got Kool-aid, no sugar. Peanut butter, no jelly. Ham, no burger. Daaamn." -Smokey
0

#3 User is online   jetfan4life12 Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,130
  • Joined: 04-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boca Raton, FL

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 04:46 PM

QUOTE (FroNTROw50yRdLyNe @ Nov 30 2008, 04:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
since that play never came infront of the line of scrimmage, and it was initself a backwards pass, wouldn't that be considered a lateral? then wouldn't that then be challangeable?

who in their right mind calls that play with 89 who has not ran that play in the rain in your own territory. Also. what is up with 27, all he had to do was push him OB
0

#4 User is offline   socaljetsfan Icon

  • Pro Bowl
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 519
  • Joined: 01-August 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 04:55 PM

Wat the hell is up with the defense?

"No sugar? Damn. Y'all ain't never got two things that match. Either y'all got Kool-aid, no sugar. Peanut butter, no jelly. Ham, no burger. Daaamn." -Smokey
0

#5 User is online   ganggreen2003 Icon

  • NO FAT CHICKS
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,308
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Warwick, RI
  • Interests:J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS
    NY YANKEES
    SYRACUSE ORANGE
    AND ANYTHING NEW YORK

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 08:04 PM

The one question I have is why was the play when Denver scored on the "Fumble" when it was obvious Jerricho was down by contact I didn't have volume at the bar cause well I live in f*cking Petriots country but what was the ruling on that play and why was the play not overturned when it was obvious that JC was down...
Posted Image
Posted Image

Well YOU BETTER BLEED GREEN & WHITE!!!!

https://twitter.com/#!/NYJ_Rob3136

http://www.facebook....47353176?v=wall

http://www.nyjetsfan.../gg03on1050.mp3

S-Dubb: like if she was giving me a handjob and I saw that thumb I don't know how I'd react
0

#6 User is offline   titmouse Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 263
  • Joined: 20-August 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Long island

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 08:15 PM

QUOTE (ganggreen2003 @ Nov 30 2008, 08:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The one question I have is why was the play when Denver scored on the "Fumble" when it was obvious Jerricho was down by contact I didn't have volume at the bar cause well I live in f*cking Petriots country but what was the ruling on that play and why was the play not overturned when it was obvious that JC was down...



They said the play was not reviewable. To me, it looked like he was down and had control of the ball, the instant the guy touches him the play should be called dead. I guess the refs on the field felt the ball was still loose.
0

#7 User is offline   gmany3k Icon

  • Old Timer
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,298
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:AUSTIN,TX MALE member 2000-01

  • NFL Team:

Posted 01 December 2008 - 08:43 AM

Can't wait to hear this one explained to me .down by contact just like when they fumbled in the last qtr did we throw fists in there ? no a tap on the back because the ball was already recovered and the man was not advancing the ball.
that was the sign right there that anything goes.......full time refs?
21ST CENTURY NEW YORK STATE OF MIND ."REST IN PEACE NIGHT OWL TOM"Use Caution when reading my comments>.Posted Image
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users