NYJetsFan.com Forums: Interesting Stat About Nugent And Other Elite Kickers. - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

Lee lee lee lee lee lee lee Lee la la lee le lee leeeee
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:27 PM) BULLSHIT PICK
ganggreen2003 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:27 PM) A LB from Ohio State
azjetfan Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:27 PM) Defiantly not an inspiring pick
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:28 PM) GHOLSTON 2.0
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:28 PM) Guy has had 12 sacks in 2 years?? how the hell is that a 1st round pass rusher
ganggreen2003 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:29 PM) At least we didn't go QB again
ganggreen2003 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:30 PM) You mean GHOSTon
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:31 PM) Not f***ing happy
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:31 PM) I hope I'm wrong tho
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:31 PM) if I'm wrong I will eat m crow
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:39 PM) Some mocks had him top 10
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:42 PM) this guy is small
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:45 PM) Most mocks had Lee at 17 to the Falcons
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:45 PM) He's a day 1 starter for us. We've needed OLB forever
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:46 PM) Plus we generate a great rush from wilk rich and Williams
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:50 PM) I wanted Lawson bad
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:50 PM) f***ing bills
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:51 PM) Lee fills a need better
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:52 PM) I would have liked tunsil to slide to us though. After east picking great
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:52 PM) Would you take Lee over Lawson?
azjetfan Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:55 PM) I'm not inspire by that pick. Not even a little
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 10:01 PM) Wasn't an option. Lawson was gone
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 10:02 PM) Lawson is more of a de. We already have too many of those. We only have 1 proven LBer and he's 32 and we run a 3-4. Lee is a day 1 starter
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 10:03 PM) Broncos traded up for lynch
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 10:41 PM) Round 1 is done
2JBallar01 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 12:43 AM) He will play ILB for us.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 11:08 AM) http://nyjetsfan.com...showtopic=38865
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 11:19 AM) jets tried to trade up for tunsil but the price was too high
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 05:10 PM) Tunsil will end up out of the league
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 05:12 PM) Lee isn't a pass rusher, hes a fast athletic LB. Hes probably their future at ILB, someone who can cover in the middle
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 06:16 PM) jets said he's an ILB for us
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 06:17 PM) If we could grab jack he would be an OLB
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 06:17 PM) ttians have 3 picks in the next 13 picks
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 06:33 PM) jack to jax 36th overal
ganggreen2003 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 06:33 PM) Did you hear that the 1st round pick for the Browns RETIRED after getting drafted
SoReALSoJetS Icon : (29 April 2016 - 07:29 PM) Hi guys long time no talk hope everyone is well
Mr_Jet Icon : (29 April 2016 - 07:46 PM) SMH
ganggreen2003 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 07:46 PM) JETS drafted QB Hackenberg PSU
Mr_Jet Icon : (29 April 2016 - 07:47 PM) Should have picked Connor Cook.
MikeGangGree... Icon : (29 April 2016 - 07:56 PM) I guess we are giving up on petty
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 09:02 PM) Or giving up on geno
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 09:02 PM) I said the rumor was they liked him more then cook
Mr_Jet Icon : (29 April 2016 - 11:35 PM) I know I'm biased, but I've seen them both play. Cook is just better. Hackenberg had one good year. Cook has won more games, played in big games and won them....whatever, its done now so no sense on dwelling on it I guess. I just don't see the appeal in Hackenberg, nice kid, but I always thought he was really overrated. Oh well. I would have taken Kevin Hogan over Hackenberg.
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 03:47 PM) From what I have read so far he had a great freshman year under Obrien in a pro style offense. At that point some considered him the next Andrew luck. Then Obrien left and they shifted to a spread under new HC who did poor job bringing in talent. He was also sacked and hit a million times. Might be shell shocked.
Smedsthejet Icon : (Today, 06:17 AM) But Chan Gailey runs a spread system - still, I'm comfortable with the Hackenberg pick seeing as Gailey will develop the system to suit his strength... I'm just glad that we passed on Paxton Lynch in the first...we still desperately need Fitz to re-sign though
Resize Shouts Area

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

Interesting Stat About Nugent And Other Elite Kickers.

#1 User is offline   Jetsfan0099 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 17,136
  • Joined: 30-July 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Jersey

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 01:40 PM

Nugent had a career high of 88.9% kicking accuratcy this year. Thats his career high, now lets show some of the elite kickers in the leagues high.
David Akers-88.2
Adam Vinatari-90
Neil Rackers-95.2
Jeff Wilkens-92.9 (though dome kickers are high because of the no wind factor)
Mort Anderson-88.6
John Carney-92.0
Jason Elam-93.1
Now look they are all kinda close, but remember here that these are their best in their careers, when Nugent has only had 2 years. Now lets look at those same kickers in their 2nd years.
David Akers-50.0
Adam Vinatari-86.2
Neil Rackers-60.7
Jeff Wilkins-92.3
Mort Anderson-75.0
John Carney-0.0
Jason Elam-81.1
Mike Nugent-88.9
Now see Nugent had a better year, then almost all of the elite kickers in their 2nd year. Just thought it was pretty interesting how Nugent compares with them.
Posted Image
0

#2 User is offline   jet456 Icon

  • Drafted Rookie
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 113
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:worcester ma,by way of harlem

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 01:49 PM

drinks.gif wow!!great post,he's only going to get better,i truly beleive that. yahoo.gif
QUOTE (Jetsfan0099 @ Jan 20 2007, 08:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Nugent had a career high of 88.9% kicking accuratcy this year. Thats his career high, now lets show some of the elite kickers in the leagues high.
David Akers-88.2
Adam Vinatari-90
Neil Rackers-95.2
Jeff Wilkens-92.9 (though dome kickers are high because of the no wind factor)
Mort Anderson-88.6
John Carney-92.0
Jason Elam-93.1
Now look they are all kinda close, but remember here that these are their best in their careers, when Nugent has only had 2 years. Now lets look at those same kickers in their 2nd years.
David Akers-50.0
Adam Vinatari-86.2
Neil Rackers-60.7
Jeff Wilkins-92.3
Mort Anderson-75.0
John Carney-0.0
Jason Elam-81.1
Mike Nugent-88.9
Now see Nugent had a better year, then almost all of the elite kickers in their 2nd year. Just thought it was pretty interesting how Nugent compares with them.

0

#3 User is offline   JetsMan4012 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,159
  • Joined: 30-October 05
  • Location:here
  • Interests:poker, rapping, football,baseball,basketball,video games

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 02:21 PM

exactly, i was thinking something along the same lines, hes doing good for a 2nd year kicker
"They think we spellin iverson when the beef all done cuz you be on I-Vs in the E-R son"- 40 Cal
" Winning isn't everything; its the only thing"



RIP Uncle Bob 5/12/06
0

#4 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,838
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 03:03 PM

now all the nugent haters are gonna become nugent lovers.
0

#5 User is offline   JetsMan4012 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,159
  • Joined: 30-October 05
  • Location:here
  • Interests:poker, rapping, football,baseball,basketball,video games

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 04:26 PM

QUOTE (Jetsfan115 @ Jan 20 2007, 03:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
now all the nugent haters are gonna become nugent lovers.

i was a nugent lover originally, after awhile i started to doubt him just a little though but now im not worried really, especially seeing these stats, i mean i thought that it was like that but didnt know it was for a fact like it
"They think we spellin iverson when the beef all done cuz you be on I-Vs in the E-R son"- 40 Cal
" Winning isn't everything; its the only thing"



RIP Uncle Bob 5/12/06
0

#6 User is offline   matt x Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,137
  • Joined: 22-July 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:upstate ny (work in L.I, NJ,&CT.
  • Interests:family, jets, mets, grateful dead.

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 04:49 PM

How could you not hate Nugent after he missed that extra point?
Posted Image
0

#7 User is offline   priortothesnap Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 239
  • Joined: 12-January 06

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 05:45 PM

Don't forget, if the Jets had a QB that could score TDs in the red zone, Nugent's FG % wouldn't be that high.

All kickers choke once in awhile, Nugent is better than most, but there's no excuse for the short kickoffs and the field position we consistently give up.
0

#8 User is offline   Jetsfan0099 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 17,136
  • Joined: 30-July 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Jersey

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 05:47 PM

QUOTE (priortothesnap @ Jan 20 2007, 06:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Don't forget, if the Jets had a QB that could score TDs in the red zone, Nugent's FG % wouldn't be that high.

Well of coarse it wouldnt. It would be 0.0 if the Jets could score Tds in the redzone, because they wouldnt need to take fieldgoals. crazy.gif
Posted Image
0

#9 User is offline   priortothesnap Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 239
  • Joined: 12-January 06

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 06:04 PM

QUOTE (Jetsfan0099 @ Jan 20 2007, 06:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Well of coarse it wouldnt. It would be 0.0 if the Jets could score Tds in the redzone, because they wouldnt need to take fieldgoals. crazy.gif



Keyword(s) = red zone. Right? You did catch that? Just checkin' ---- many posters here don't know how to read.

He'd still need to kick FGs beyond the red zone.
0

#10 User is offline   JetsMan4012 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,159
  • Joined: 30-October 05
  • Location:here
  • Interests:poker, rapping, football,baseball,basketball,video games

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 06:10 PM

QUOTE (matt x @ Jan 20 2007, 05:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
How could you not hate Nugent after he missed that extra point?

u do know its not like hes the only one ever to miss an extra point
"They think we spellin iverson when the beef all done cuz you be on I-Vs in the E-R son"- 40 Cal
" Winning isn't everything; its the only thing"



RIP Uncle Bob 5/12/06
0

#11 User is offline   Fatman Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,540
  • Joined: 14-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 06:16 PM

He's a good kicker who should be around for the next few years. it took him a little longer than people expected for him to be a good kicker but he is now so thats that.

Thanks for the Memories
0

#12 User is offline   Jetsfan0099 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 17,136
  • Joined: 30-July 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Jersey

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 09:58 PM

QUOTE (priortothesnap @ Jan 20 2007, 06:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Keyword(s) = red zone. Right? You did catch that? Just checkin' ---- many posters here don't know how to read.

He'd still need to kick FGs beyond the red zone.

Dude, he kicked a 54 yarder, a 52 yarder, he was 4-4 on 40-49 yards, 2-3 on 50+ yarders. I did read the redzone, but the guy only missed 3 kicks this year, and 1 extra point. Idk why you are argueing about him being bad. He is 10-12 from 30-39. And its not like his field goals come in the red zone, he made most of his field goals in the 30+ range.
Posted Image
0

#13 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,838
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 10:04 PM

QUOTE (priortothesnap @ Jan 20 2007, 03:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Keyword(s) = red zone. Right? You did catch that? Just checkin' ---- many posters here don't know how to read.

He'd still need to kick FGs beyond the red zone.


He's 6-7 on 40+ and the one miss was a 52 yarder
0

#14 User is offline   HarlemHxC814 Icon

  • 06 Best Avatar Award / N.O.P. GUARD
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 5,173
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 10:30 PM

QUOTE (Jetsfan115 @ Jan 20 2007, 10:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
He's 6-7 on 40+ and the one miss was a 52 yarder


If I'm not mistaken, wasn't the 52 yarder a pressure kick. I mean 6/7 from 40+ is good but yeah, he did make a game winner against the Fish, but it's those pressure kicks from (at least) 45+ yards that we need to see him hit. Like OhFive said, he gets his name back, but still needs to do a little bit more to prove himself. Give me a good pressure situation out of Nuge
Posted Image
0

#15 User is offline   Chadforpresidentin08 Icon

  • 05 M. I. P. Award/06 Teen MVP Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,029
  • Joined: 01-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois (Originally from New York)
  • Interests:Jets and Yanks

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 10:34 PM

That's some damn fine researching there JetsFan0099. drinks.gif
I think the knack on Nugent as a whole has been kicking off, which we all know. I'm gonna go out on a limb when I say he didn't record a singe TB this year, not good, and no way do I want one kicker to kick FGs and some other guy kickoff. That's ridiculous. As soon as he does that, it'll be 100% love from everyone here I bet.
"You ask, what is our aim?... It is victory, victory at all cost" Winston Churchill.
Member since March 25, 2005.
0

#16 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,838
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 January 2007 - 10:50 PM

QUOTE (HarlemHellfighterNYC @ Jan 20 2007, 08:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If I'm not mistaken, wasn't the 52 yarder a pressure kick. I mean 6/7 from 40+ is good but yeah, he did make a game winner against the Fish, but it's those pressure kicks from (at least) 45+ yards that we need to see him hit. Like OhFive said, he gets his name back, but still needs to do a little bit more to prove himself. Give me a good pressure situation out of Nuge


he didn't miss any presure kicks this year
0

#17 User is offline   priortothesnap Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 239
  • Joined: 12-January 06

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 January 2007 - 01:48 AM

QUOTE (Jetsfan0099 @ Jan 20 2007, 10:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Dude, he kicked a 54 yarder, a 52 yarder, he was 4-4 on 40-49 yards, 2-3 on 50+ yarders. I did read the redzone, but the guy only missed 3 kicks this year, and 1 extra point. Idk why you are argueing about him being bad. He is 10-12 from 30-39. And its not like his field goals come in the red zone, he made most of his field goals in the 30+ range.



Uh, who's arguing? First off, I was taking a cynical shot at Pennington. Secondly, I was making a perfectly valid point about Nug's FG% dropping if you remove all the red zone chip-shot padding. He's 6/7 total outside the red zone (39 yds or longer). That's 85.7%, not 88.9%. When you said his FG% would be 00.0% if we scored only TDs in the red zone, that's true for the red, but not for his overall %. Just clarifying your unclear post, which seemed to imply either:

A. He only kicks FGs within the redzone, or
B. If he attempts anything longer, he'll miss them all

Anyway, 85.7% is still good, I wasn't knocking his FGs to begin with. Nugent made 20 red zone attempts, 23 if you count the WC. Not sure how many red zone appearances NY made in total, perhaps one of you hotshots can look that up.....
0

#18 User is offline   priortothesnap Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 239
  • Joined: 12-January 06

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 January 2007 - 02:14 AM

QUOTE (Chadforpresidentin08 @ Jan 20 2007, 11:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think the knack on Nugent as a whole has been kicking off, which we all know.


Which you all know? That's a friggin' joke. When I first posted it, all you butt-fumes got your knickers in a twist, and heaved fur balls for a good week.

QUOTE
I'm gonna go out on a limb when I say he didn't record a singe TB this year.


It's hard to remember them, but he did do it twice. Like I said earlier, he must've had the help of a category-five hurricane on those occasions.
0

#19 User is offline   priortothesnap Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 239
  • Joined: 12-January 06

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 January 2007 - 03:04 AM

QUOTE (Jetsfan0099 @ Jan 20 2007, 10:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
. He is 10-12 from 30-39. And its not like his field goals come in the red zone, he made most of his field goals in the 30+ range.


20 of his 27 FG attempts this season were from the red zone. Nugent uses an 8-yd snap, so anything 38-yds or less is red zone for him.
0

#20 User is offline   Smedsthejet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 8,292
  • Joined: 10-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 January 2007 - 09:42 AM

QUOTE (Jetsfan0099 @ Jan 21 2007, 03:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
No your wrong. Redzone is from the 20 yard line in. Thats the redzone. So that 20 for 27, is wrong, because he taken more out of the redzone then that, and if you take every kickers redzone shots then every kicker would drop. He still made them, so w/e.


Isn't a redzone attempt from whenever the offense has got inside the 20-yard line. So an attempt where the LOS is at the 20 yard line, probably a 38 yarder, would be counted as a redzone FG attempt?
If so then even if the offense got inside the 20, lost some yards, say to the 25 yard line, and settled for a FG with the LOS from there, that would be a redzone FG attempt.
0

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users