NYJetsFan.com Forums: North Korea Tests Nukes - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

Lets go cotchery
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (26 January 2016 - 10:23 AM) of course
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (26 January 2016 - 10:23 AM) we franchise tag him
vjdbbq Icon : (26 January 2016 - 02:41 PM) But then we have very little cap room left . Is he worth it ?
MikeGangGree... Icon : (26 January 2016 - 09:43 PM) If we cut cro and brick we will be around 28 million under the cap. We can tag him
MikeGangGree... Icon : (26 January 2016 - 09:44 PM) Or tag and trade him. No way we should just let him walk
vjdbbq Icon : (27 January 2016 - 08:24 AM) We need Cro and Brick but for less salary .
S-Dubb Icon : (29 January 2016 - 10:18 AM) what up home dawgs?
S-Dubb Icon : (29 January 2016 - 10:22 AM) long time no chat, Ya boy has returned from the depths. Good to see everyone alive and well. Another season down the drain... what else is new? Fitz coming back next yr means we wont be going to the superbowl. We seriously need to land a QB. I hope Petty is the future and Im still quietly waiting for Geno to show up. IF they retain him it would speak volumes
Mr_Jet Icon : (29 January 2016 - 11:23 AM) I'm done with Geno. Never really expected much from him from the beginning. So I'm also looking for Petty to be the future.
vjdbbq Icon : (29 January 2016 - 04:33 PM) GENO SUCKS MONKEY DICK
MikeGangGree... Icon : (29 January 2016 - 07:16 PM) S-Dubb??.Who's that guy?
MikeGangGree... Icon : (29 January 2016 - 07:17 PM) FIRE S-DUBB
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (30 January 2016 - 09:10 AM) Dubb and Amen? Did I take a wrong turn and land back in 2007?
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (30 January 2016 - 09:10 AM) Haha good to see both of you
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (30 January 2016 - 03:28 PM) I don't care if Cro comes back, I think Marcus Williams can start opposite Revis. Hes a ball hawk and has performed well everytime hes called on.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (30 January 2016 - 03:41 PM) I want Fitz back as starter, he lacks arm talent but he is scrappy
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (30 January 2016 - 03:41 PM) The team loves him as a leader and he is a good bridge QB as we groom a QB of the future.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (30 January 2016 - 03:42 PM) He also has top notch pocket awareness.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (30 January 2016 - 03:42 PM) He allows our playmakers to make plays. After years of terrible QB play, I'll take 31 TD 15 INTs almost 4,000 yards
MikeGangGree... Icon : (01 February 2016 - 12:41 AM) I can't stop thinking about the off season...... what the hell are we gonna do!!
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 February 2016 - 09:59 AM) Maccagnan is going to have to show his worth
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 February 2016 - 10:00 AM) They can't have Wilkerson on that franchise tag, they have to sign him long term with a small cap hit or trade him. Otherwise we are in trouble with other FAs.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 February 2016 - 10:00 AM) We need Harrison back, you can't run a effective 3-4 without a stud NT.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 February 2016 - 10:01 AM) I hope we get Harrison back on a 4 yr contract.
MikeGangGree... Icon : (02 February 2016 - 12:55 PM) I really think we are going to have to tag and trade Wilkerson
MikeGangGree... Icon : (02 February 2016 - 12:56 PM) If we keep wilk we lose Harrison or Fitzpatrick maybe both
MikeGangGree... Icon : (02 February 2016 - 12:56 PM) And ivory
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 February 2016 - 07:23 PM) We can't keep Wilkerson, Richardson, and Williams. A move has to be made
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 February 2016 - 07:25 PM) If the Jets want to go cheaper, they can try to trade Wilkerson and have Richardson/Williams for cheap
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 February 2016 - 07:25 PM) Then they can re-sign Harrison, FItzpatrick, Ivory, and maybe Powell.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 February 2016 - 09:59 AM) Kaepernick apparently wants out of SF and wants to join the Jets
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 February 2016 - 09:59 AM) Guess he sees the Jets as a team with a great WR tandem and a quality OC who builds a offense around the players
MikeGangGree... Icon : (03 February 2016 - 10:29 AM) No thanks
MikeGangGree... Icon : (03 February 2016 - 10:29 AM) Unless he's dirt cheap
MikeGangGree... Icon : (03 February 2016 - 10:30 AM) The jets would be fools to take on that contract
Jetsfan115 Icon : (03 February 2016 - 02:09 PM) keep powell, snakcs, wilkerson, and fitz. let ivory walk, trade richardson, cut cromartie, restructure brick
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 February 2016 - 04:18 PM) Marshall said no to Kaepnerick, he wants FItzpatrick as his QB
vjdbbq Icon : (04 February 2016 - 12:07 PM) Where's Rob ? I need some ass shots !!!!!
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Today, 04:16 PM) its crazy how dead this site is
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Today, 04:16 PM) its super bowl Sunday!!
vjdbbq Icon : (Today, 04:47 PM) Everybody is at Rob's house ; checking out the asses !!!!!
Smedsthejet Icon : (Today, 05:17 PM) Hope Cotchery gets a ring tonight
santana Icon : (Today, 07:04 PM) Yeah I would rather see a panther win
santana Icon : (Today, 07:25 PM) Zzzz
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 09:03 PM) I want to see Manning go out on top
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

North Korea Tests Nukes

#1 User is offline   penningtonpays Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,292
  • Joined: 30-March 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 08 October 2006 - 10:47 PM

please leave this in the man show forum, the politics barley gets any action..

http://news.yahoo.co.../koreas_nuclear

do any of you think an interaction with north korea could be next?

IPB Image
0

#2 User is offline   Smedsthejet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 8,292
  • Joined: 10-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 09 October 2006 - 12:10 PM

It depends if the UN take any action first but seeing as China (an ally of N. Korea) is on the Security Council and would most likely veto any sanctions then I doubt the UN will do much.
If any action is taken by countries such as the US and UK then expect backlash from a number of countries including Iran who are also supposedly developing nukes. If anyone attacks N. Korea, no doubt Kim Jong Il will attack S. Korea sparking what could be WW3.
0

#3 User is offline   Long Time Jet Fan Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 831
  • Joined: 24-March 06

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 09 October 2006 - 01:11 PM

QUOTE (Smedsthejet @ Oct 9 2006, 10:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It depends if the UN take any action first but seeing as China (an ally of N. Korea) is on the Security Council and would most likely veto any sanctions then I doubt the UN will do much.
If any action is taken by countries such as the US and UK then expect backlash from a number of countries including Iran who are also supposedly developing nukes. If anyone attacks N. Korea, no doubt Kim Jong Il will attack S. Korea sparking what could be WW3.

Does the UN ever do much? It's basically a worthless organization.
0

#4 User is offline   Smedsthejet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 8,292
  • Joined: 10-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 09 October 2006 - 01:42 PM

QUOTE (Long Time Jet Fan @ Oct 9 2006, 07:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Does the UN ever do much? It's basically a worthless organization.


If nations came together and put their own interests aside when at the UN then things would happen. Some countries like to stay out of international affairs which is why the UN has little real power but without there would be a load of trouble and countries would revert back to the old colony system to build power.
0

#5 User is offline   bluflash Icon

  • Drafted Rookie
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 51
  • Joined: 27-August 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 09 October 2006 - 02:27 PM

QUOTE (Smedsthejet @ Oct 9 2006, 03:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If nations came together and put their own interests aside when at the UN then things would happen. Some countries like to stay out of international affairs which is why the UN has little real power but without there would be a load of trouble and countries would revert back to the old colony system to build power.

I WONDER IF THE PEOPLE IN DARFUR THINK THE U.N. DOES A GOOD JOB OR RAWANDA.
0

#6 User is offline   ganggreen_ewok Icon

  • 06 M. I. P. Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,813
  • Joined: 18-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:MEOWSBURG
  • Interests:Strolling on shady streets, you know the usual

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 October 2006 - 12:01 AM

QUOTE (Smedsthejet @ Oct 9 2006, 12:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It depends if the UN take any action first but seeing as China (an ally of N. Korea) is on the Security Council and would most likely veto any sanctions then I doubt the UN will do much.
If any action is taken by countries such as the US and UK then expect backlash from a number of countries including Iran who are also supposedly developing nukes. If anyone attacks N. Korea, no doubt Kim Jong Il will attack S. Korea sparking what could be WW3.


Don't put anything past Kim Jung Il, hes possibly the craziest person of power in the world. Makes Rasputin look tame.

As fr the UN, if anything gets done its 98% US&UK, 2% the other countries. Don't get me started on the joke organization

View Postganggreen_ewok, on 13 June 2011 - 07:43 PM, said:

"And once again, the meow became a roar"


Posted Image
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users