NYJetsFan.com Forums: Lateral Not Fumble - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

Lee lee lee lee lee lee lee Lee la la lee le lee leeeee
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 09:25 PM) Lee
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 09:26 PM) Who?
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 09:27 PM) WTF
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 09:27 PM) BULLSHIT PICK
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 09:27 PM) A LB from Ohio State
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 09:27 PM) Defiantly not an inspiring pick
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 09:28 PM) GHOLSTON 2.0
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 09:28 PM) Guy has had 12 sacks in 2 years?? how the hell is that a 1st round pass rusher
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 09:29 PM) At least we didn't go QB again
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 09:30 PM) You mean GHOSTon
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 09:31 PM) Not f***ing happy
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 09:31 PM) I hope I'm wrong tho
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 09:31 PM) if I'm wrong I will eat m crow
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 09:39 PM) Some mocks had him top 10
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 09:42 PM) this guy is small
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 09:45 PM) Most mocks had Lee at 17 to the Falcons
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 09:45 PM) He's a day 1 starter for us. We've needed OLB forever
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 09:46 PM) Plus we generate a great rush from wilk rich and Williams
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 09:50 PM) I wanted Lawson bad
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 09:50 PM) f***ing bills
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 09:51 PM) Lee fills a need better
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 09:52 PM) I would have liked tunsil to slide to us though. After east picking great
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 09:52 PM) Would you take Lee over Lawson?
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 09:55 PM) I'm not inspire by that pick. Not even a little
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 10:01 PM) Wasn't an option. Lawson was gone
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 10:02 PM) Lawson is more of a de. We already have too many of those. We only have 1 proven LBer and he's 32 and we run a 3-4. Lee is a day 1 starter
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 10:03 PM) Broncos traded up for lynch
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 10:41 PM) Round 1 is done
2JBallar01 Icon : (Today, 12:43 AM) He will play ILB for us.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 11:08 AM) http://nyjetsfan.com...showtopic=38865
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 11:19 AM) jets tried to trade up for tunsil but the price was too high
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 05:10 PM) Tunsil will end up out of the league
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 05:12 PM) Lee isn't a pass rusher, hes a fast athletic LB. Hes probably their future at ILB, someone who can cover in the middle
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 06:16 PM) jets said he's an ILB for us
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 06:17 PM) If we could grab jack he would be an OLB
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 06:17 PM) ttians have 3 picks in the next 13 picks
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 06:33 PM) jack to jax 36th overal
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 06:33 PM) Did you hear that the 1st round pick for the Browns RETIRED after getting drafted
SoReALSoJetS Icon : (Today, 07:29 PM) Hi guys long time no talk hope everyone is well
Mr_Jet Icon : (Today, 07:46 PM) SMH
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 07:46 PM) JETS drafted QB Hackenberg PSU
Mr_Jet Icon : (Today, 07:47 PM) Should have picked Connor Cook.
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Today, 07:56 PM) I guess we are giving up on petty
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 09:02 PM) Or giving up on geno
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 09:02 PM) I said the rumor was they liked him more then cook
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Lateral Not Fumble

#1 User is offline   TheGreenCoachesClub Icon

  • Pro Bowl
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 525
  • Joined: 25-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Westfield NJ

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 04:35 PM

since that play never came infront of the line of scrimmage, and it was initself a backwards pass, wouldn't that be considered a lateral? then wouldn't that then be challangeable?
0

#2 User is offline   socaljetsfan Icon

  • Pro Bowl
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 519
  • Joined: 01-August 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 04:37 PM

Ya that play makes no sense, but good teams answer back like that.

"No sugar? Damn. Y'all ain't never got two things that match. Either y'all got Kool-aid, no sugar. Peanut butter, no jelly. Ham, no burger. Daaamn." -Smokey
0

#3 User is offline   jetfan4life12 Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,147
  • Joined: 04-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boca Raton, FL

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 04:46 PM

QUOTE (FroNTROw50yRdLyNe @ Nov 30 2008, 04:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
since that play never came infront of the line of scrimmage, and it was initself a backwards pass, wouldn't that be considered a lateral? then wouldn't that then be challangeable?

who in their right mind calls that play with 89 who has not ran that play in the rain in your own territory. Also. what is up with 27, all he had to do was push him OB
0

#4 User is offline   socaljetsfan Icon

  • Pro Bowl
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 519
  • Joined: 01-August 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 04:55 PM

Wat the hell is up with the defense?

"No sugar? Damn. Y'all ain't never got two things that match. Either y'all got Kool-aid, no sugar. Peanut butter, no jelly. Ham, no burger. Daaamn." -Smokey
0

#5 User is offline   ganggreen2003 Icon

  • NO FAT CHICKS
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,321
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rhode Island
  • Interests:J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS
    NY YANKEES
    SYRACUSE ORANGE
    AND ANYTHING NEW YORK

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 08:04 PM

The one question I have is why was the play when Denver scored on the "Fumble" when it was obvious Jerricho was down by contact I didn't have volume at the bar cause well I live in f*cking Petriots country but what was the ruling on that play and why was the play not overturned when it was obvious that JC was down...
Posted Image
Posted Image

Well YOU BETTER BLEED GREEN & WHITE!!!!

https://twitter.com/#!/NYJ_Rob3136

http://www.facebook....47353176?v=wall

http://www.nyjetsfan.../gg03on1050.mp3

S-Dubb: like if she was giving me a handjob and I saw that thumb I don't know how I'd react
0

#6 User is offline   titmouse Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 263
  • Joined: 20-August 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Long island

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 08:15 PM

QUOTE (ganggreen2003 @ Nov 30 2008, 08:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The one question I have is why was the play when Denver scored on the "Fumble" when it was obvious Jerricho was down by contact I didn't have volume at the bar cause well I live in f*cking Petriots country but what was the ruling on that play and why was the play not overturned when it was obvious that JC was down...



They said the play was not reviewable. To me, it looked like he was down and had control of the ball, the instant the guy touches him the play should be called dead. I guess the refs on the field felt the ball was still loose.
0

#7 User is offline   gmany3k Icon

  • Old Timer
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,303
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:AUSTIN,TX MALE member 2000-01

  • NFL Team:

Posted 01 December 2008 - 08:43 AM

Can't wait to hear this one explained to me .down by contact just like when they fumbled in the last qtr did we throw fists in there ? no a tap on the back because the ball was already recovered and the man was not advancing the ball.
that was the sign right there that anything goes.......full time refs?
21ST CENTURY NEW YORK STATE OF MIND ."REST IN PEACE NIGHT OWL TOM"Use Caution when reading my comments>.Posted Image
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users