Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jet Madden Rankings all are out on ign
#2
Posted 10 August 2006 - 12:41 PM
wow they added A LOT of rankings. now there are specific rankings for zone and man coverage for d backs insane.
also each player has a different ranking for every move like jukes, spins, stiffarms, and ellusiveness- probably becasue of the highlight stick, but thats sweet.
I think this years game is goin to be a lot more realistic all around the way they have player rankings. I CANT WAIT TO GET IT ITS GUNNA BE SICK!!
also each player has a different ranking for every move like jukes, spins, stiffarms, and ellusiveness- probably becasue of the highlight stick, but thats sweet.
I think this years game is goin to be a lot more realistic all around the way they have player rankings. I CANT WAIT TO GET IT ITS GUNNA BE SICK!!

Chad= Cheerleader
#4
Posted 10 August 2006 - 12:41 PM
Pennington, Cotchery, Vilma, Baker, B.Smith, Schlegal and J.Miller are all players I see with better overalls after a couple of roster updates. Overall I think its fair. Only Cotchery and Vilma were the only ones that kind of threw me off. I think those 2 are better than a 75 and 92 overall....Ive been playing Madden for over 9 yrs and thats what I think.
#10
Posted 10 August 2006 - 12:58 PM
#12
Posted 10 August 2006 - 01:03 PM
The will to win is important, but the will to prepare is vital.- Joe Paterno
"Believe deep down inside that you're destined to do great things"- Joe Paterno
"Believe deep down inside that you're destined to do great things"- Joe Paterno
#13
Posted 10 August 2006 - 01:04 PM
QUOTE (EnRiCH13 @ Aug 10 2006, 02:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
82?
My only guess is that its Joel Dreessen or Jason Pociask and they made a mistake on the number?
#16
Posted 10 August 2006 - 01:09 PM
QUOTE (vilmatime51 @ Aug 10 2006, 02:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
these are some very generous ratings!
I have to agree. Not saying I disagree with them though. But if you look at scout rankings by, let's say, ESPN.com, they have Vilma's score as 77 out of 100 with him being the 18th best LB in the NFL.
<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green"><!--/coloro--><!--sizeo:5--><span style="font-size:18pt;line-height:100%"><!--/sizeo--><b>SCORING MORE THAN YOUR OPPONENTS WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS</b><!--sizec--></span><!--/sizec--><!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->
#19
Posted 10 August 2006 - 01:47 PM
1st madden is correct on barrett the guy is a very good corner and at this point is better then miller.
a few guys i feel are underated are
Vilma only a 92?
Jones at 79? he was our best lineman lats year at RT and LT he should be an 85ish
dyson at 84? no way he should be an 88 or 89
rhodes ahould be an 80 at least
also why is coles speed still a 98? he's not THAT fast. and why is vilma only a 83 for speed?
i'm suprised ellis got the recognition he deserves as a 93 but no way is he better then vilma
a few guys i feel are underated are
Vilma only a 92?
Jones at 79? he was our best lineman lats year at RT and LT he should be an 85ish
dyson at 84? no way he should be an 88 or 89
rhodes ahould be an 80 at least
also why is coles speed still a 98? he's not THAT fast. and why is vilma only a 83 for speed?
i'm suprised ellis got the recognition he deserves as a 93 but no way is he better then vilma
Get it done MT
#20
Posted 10 August 2006 - 02:35 PM
QUOTE (Jetsfan115 @ Aug 10 2006, 03:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
1st madden is correct on barrett the guy is a very good corner and at this point is better then miller.
a few guys i feel are underated are
Vilma only a 92?
Jones at 79? he was our best lineman lats year at RT and LT he should be an 85ish
dyson at 84? no way he should be an 88 or 89
rhodes ahould be an 80 at least
also why is coles speed still a 98? he's not THAT fast. and why is vilma only a 83 for speed?
i'm suprised ellis got the recognition he deserves as a 93 but no way is he better then vilma
a few guys i feel are underated are
Vilma only a 92?
Jones at 79? he was our best lineman lats year at RT and LT he should be an 85ish
dyson at 84? no way he should be an 88 or 89
rhodes ahould be an 80 at least
also why is coles speed still a 98? he's not THAT fast. and why is vilma only a 83 for speed?
i'm suprised ellis got the recognition he deserves as a 93 but no way is he better then vilma
Ellis is the same rating as Abraham. They are both 93.
Idk about Jones being 85, that may be alittle high, probaly a 83 atleast though.
Rhodes will be up in the 80s on the updates, just has to make plays.
Dyson Idk about him, they did put him alittle low, I think Dyson is better then Barret.
Vilma should be 95 rated atleast. He was 94 rated at the last roster update last year.

Sign In
Register
Help




MultiQuote


















