NYJetsFan.com Forums: Ea Sports Jets Ratings - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

Azjetfan is the nyjetsfan #1 pick
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 03:32 PM) so he doesn't want to be drafted?
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 03:33 PM) If Collins doesn't get drafted, he can't enter next years draft. He can only if he is drafted and sits out. So I guess he has to go undrafted
V DidDy 210 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 03:41 PM) going undrafted makes the most sense for collins
V DidDy 210 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 03:41 PM) but for teams, drafting him and dealing with his holdout makes more sense
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:19 PM) Zac Stacy was traded to us for our 7th
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:21 PM) Jets also drafted a NT with our other 7th
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:21 PM) 6'4 330 DL who is very strong
V DidDy 210 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:25 PM) zac stacy for a 7th
V DidDy 210 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:25 PM) well can't complain about that
MikeGangGree... Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:29 PM) So we have 4 rbs now
V DidDy 210 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:31 PM) still would have rather taken a runner on collins but i can't complain with depth
V DidDy 210 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:32 PM) i mean they can't expect to carry 4 rb though no?
azjetfan Icon : (02 May 2015 - 05:50 PM) Collins would have been a waste. He would not have signed. At least we have something to show for our pick. Worst case scenario is we trade or release one of our backs.
azjetfan Icon : (02 May 2015 - 05:56 PM) I know it's hard to tell without seeing a win loss record yet but this regime seems really on point.
azjetfan Icon : (02 May 2015 - 05:56 PM) For the first time in my life I can say I feel comfortable with the people making the decisions.
azjetfan Icon : (02 May 2015 - 05:57 PM) I was close with Parcells but he seemed like a short term fixer and didn't care about the long term
MikeGangGree... Icon : (02 May 2015 - 06:57 PM) SUCK FOR THE DUCK
MikeGangGree... Icon : (02 May 2015 - 06:57 PM) .......oh wait
santana Icon : (03 May 2015 - 01:13 AM) Well that was a disappointment
Chadforpresi... Icon : (03 May 2015 - 01:24 AM) I like getting Stacy for our 7th rounder, assuming he can handle the fact he won't be a feature back (yikes)
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:31 AM) I like the trade, hes a quality back and adds more depth to our backfield
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:32 AM) Macc has pretty much killed it this offseason
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:32 AM) He has turned this roster around, he has added talent and competition all over.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:33 AM) We still aren't great at QB, but our overall football team is good. We have a realistic shot at making a playoff run
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:33 AM) We may have the best defense in football. We have a great DL and secondary, that is gonna be tough on offenses when you can stop the run, pressure the QB, and blanket the receivers
ganggreen2003 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:23 PM) ok now it's time for this team to take all this talent and do something anything below a 10-6 season will be a disappointment
ganggreen2003 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:24 PM) the only still glaring issue is QB
ganggreen2003 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:25 PM) we got the WR problem solved, we got probably one of the best Defenses in the game and we have addressed the OL but QB will still be the glaring issue
Chaos Icon : (04 May 2015 - 09:34 AM) jets cleaning house
azjetfan Icon : (04 May 2015 - 05:57 PM) I'm excited about this year. Could be a good year for the Jets.
ganggreen2003 Icon : (04 May 2015 - 07:32 PM) weird how they cleaned house in the scouting department after such a successful draft and off-season so far
azjetfan Icon : (04 May 2015 - 07:36 PM) I assume they didn't bring much to the table
santana Icon : (04 May 2015 - 08:41 PM) Have to clean the table
santana Icon : (04 May 2015 - 09:08 PM) Fuck the rangers
santana Icon : (04 May 2015 - 09:08 PM) face off dominated holtby gtfo
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (04 May 2015 - 09:18 PM) La'el Collins is meeting with Rex Ryan tonight
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 12:31 AM) FIVE FINGER DEATH PUNCH!
Chaos Icon : (Yesterday, 05:41 AM) Damn that'd make up for the Bills not having a first rounder
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 10:59 AM) They didn't sign him yet. It's just a visit.
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 01:49 PM) Uefa time
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 11:56 PM) Not sure if anyone saw this on the MSN home page but might be something worth looking into for the offensive line
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 11:56 PM) http://www.msn.com/e...d=HPDHP#image=4
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:35 PM) They are going to fry Brady.
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:36 PM) Not only caught cheating but also did not cooperate with investigators.
santana Icon : (Today, 05:04 PM) Messi goat
Resize Shouts Area

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Ea Sports Jets Ratings WTF.... Jets ratings messed up

#1 User is offline   LeonhardSkynyrd36 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,854
  • Joined: 29-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ATL GA
  • Interests:Progression

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 09 June 2005 - 10:09 PM

Offense - 86 Defense - 76 OVRALL - 81

now i know that these arent final, but why is it that every year the jets offense is also overated and our defense is underrated..... well im just stating this. kinda pisses me off rtfm.gif
ColesReturns87
0

#2 User is offline   extmenace Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,645
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tallahassee / Sarasota, FL

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 09 June 2005 - 11:50 PM

i saw that somewhere...no way in hell that will be true. EA is somewhat accurate with ratings. we should be around an 88-90 team.

"I'm glad that the Gillette field was soft and messy
since I spent so much time down on it."-Tom Brady


17 POINTS!
0

#3 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 09 June 2005 - 11:54 PM

I posted this a while back, look in the Game part of the forums.
0

#4 User is offline   The Reverend Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,190
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 04:49 AM

WTF!?
Our defense was ranked 6th overall!
WE DESERVE BETTER
Sal Paolantonio commenting on the difference in the Ryan and Mangini atmospheres in the building:
"It's like going from Alcatraz to Dorney Park."

It is better to destroy than create what is meaningless, so the picture will not be finished.
erikcoleman#26
0

#5 User is offline   BringtheJetsHome2NY Icon

  • Free Agent
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 44
  • Joined: 22-April 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 02:06 PM

what they do is they do it be what ranking they give the players. As you all know, our offence would have a lot of high 80 and some 90 players, so it has to be ranked high. Besides vilma, ellis and abe, i dont think that they could justify making anyone else in that class, so the defence has to be low
0

#6 User is offline   Chadforpresidentin08 Icon

  • 05 M. I. P. Award/06 Teen MVP Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,029
  • Joined: 01-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois (Originally from New York)
  • Interests:Jets and Yanks

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:01 PM

What about Barton, Coleman, and Robertson? Hobson isn't the worst player either, nor is Barrett.
"You ask, what is our aim?... It is victory, victory at all cost" Winston Churchill.
Member since March 25, 2005.
0

#7 User is offline   S-Dubb Icon

  • 2008 Best Insider Award
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 31,145
  • Joined: 02-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:---
  • Interests:Hardcore Jets & Knicks fan - Gym rat - health and nutrition - family man and proud father.

    Twitter: @NYJETSFANCOM

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:04 PM

In the old game we were rated 84 offence and 83 defence after the updates took place.

I wouldn't worry about these ranking because non of them are final. Also they do updates as players get better or get injured and so on.
0

#8 User is offline   Chadforpresidentin08 Icon

  • 05 M. I. P. Award/06 Teen MVP Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,029
  • Joined: 01-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois (Originally from New York)
  • Interests:Jets and Yanks

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 03:12 PM

But the worst is Martin won't be a 90 overall I bet and then after year 1 he'll drop down by like 2-3 overall points and his speed will be like 85, Chrebet will have the same thing.
"You ask, what is our aim?... It is victory, victory at all cost" Winston Churchill.
Member since March 25, 2005.
0

#9 User is offline   S-Dubb Icon

  • 2008 Best Insider Award
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 31,145
  • Joined: 02-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:---
  • Interests:Hardcore Jets & Knicks fan - Gym rat - health and nutrition - family man and proud father.

    Twitter: @NYJETSFANCOM

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 06:18 PM

they have to make Martin even better in the new game. Just because he was the rushing leader. I think he was 90 speed 99 awareness 89 agility. I think they will keep his speed the same but add attribute points to his agility and break tackle. I don't matter to me martin will be good either way. I run the ball a ton anyway. They way Curtis is now is pretty good. He only has to get better.
0

#10 User is offline   Chadforpresidentin08 Icon

  • 05 M. I. P. Award/06 Teen MVP Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,029
  • Joined: 01-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois (Originally from New York)
  • Interests:Jets and Yanks

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 06:43 PM

Well in 2005 he was like 89 when you first get him, awareness 92, speed 87, and agility is like 84. I usually pass, but I still get a good 1,200 yards out of Martin.
"You ask, what is our aim?... It is victory, victory at all cost" Winston Churchill.
Member since March 25, 2005.
0

#11 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 06:45 PM

Guys I posted the other teams ratings a while back, if you wanna check them out go here:

http://nyjetsfan.com...p?showtopic=913
0

#12 User is offline   Miller_Light#34 Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 260
  • Joined: 21-May 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 10 June 2005 - 11:06 PM

i remember. dubb and i know how these rattings work on Xbox live and the jets had the favoriteable Numbers so i'm not all worryed yet
0

#13 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 11:10 PM

When the players ratings come out, don't worry I will have most of the jets ratings.
0

#14 User is offline   LeonhardSkynyrd36 Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,854
  • Joined: 29-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ATL GA
  • Interests:Progression

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 19 June 2005 - 03:39 AM

Just stating the fact that C-Mart was 77 OVRL in ESPN 2K5 lol wow what idiots
blowup.gif blowup.gif blowup.gif
ColesReturns87
0

#15 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 19 June 2005 - 03:26 PM

QUOTE (ColesReturns87 @ Jun 19 2005, 09:14 AM)
Just stating the fact that C-Mart was 77 OVRL in ESPN 2K5 lol wow what idiots
blowup.gif  blowup.gif  blowup.gif


That is probably one huge reason why Madden is still here, and ESPN is not. Madden does have bad ratings, but they are no where near as bad as ESPN. ESPN's rating system is a joke.
0

#16 User is online   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,760
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 June 2005 - 01:23 PM

actuall if u update the stats he is a 90. thats why u need xbox live. 2k had the best stats. madden has gannon faster then mcnair
0

#17 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 21 June 2005 - 02:08 PM

QUOTE (Jetsfan115 @ Jun 21 2005, 06:58 PM)
actuall if u update the stats he is a 90. thats why u need xbox live. 2k had the best stats. madden has gannon faster then mcnair


90 in my opinion is still a little worse for the person who "WON" the rushing title. If you win a rushing title, you should be rated higher then some people, sure he is older then some people. But, he "BEAT" the younger people in rushing yards... SO what I am saying is...

Madden>2K
0

#18 User is online   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,760
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 June 2005 - 02:29 PM

more carries and a better o-line then most of them ( we had a top 3 o-line) no ranking will ever be perfect but 2003 was the last better madden and only slightly. 2k4 and 2k5 were way better.
0

#19 Guest_JCBizkit87_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 21 June 2005 - 05:52 PM

QUOTE (Jetsfan115 @ Jun 21 2005, 08:04 PM)
more carries and a better o-line then most of them ( we had a top 3 o-line) no ranking will ever be perfect but 2003 was the last better madden and only slightly. 2k4 and 2k5 were way better.


I never liked those game so of course I have to disagree, Compare the franchises for one thing. Franchise is probably the thing mostly everybody plays, Madden kills 2K in that category, obviously. In my opinion 2k5 was crap, but 2k4 was pretty good. You know what I am gonna say. It's obvious what i am going to say...

Madden>2k

Which is why 2K cannot make anymore football video games, and Madden can. See the difference?
0

#20 User is online   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,760
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 22 June 2005 - 08:55 AM

the franchise in 2k5 was way better. 2K can't make games anymore because maden paid big time money to buy out the NFL license. it had nothing to do with quality. donald trump could have bought it and made his own game and madden would be no more
0

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users