and you do know next year the bulls have the option the swap draft picks right? so say the bulls are picking 22 and the knicks are picking 3..guess what? the bulls will be picking 3 and the knicks will be picking 22. soo hows eddy curry for ya`ll?
Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Off-topic: Larry Brown Fired Dolan and Isiah suck
#21
Posted 22 June 2006 - 07:10 PM
QUOTE (SignalZero @ Jun 22 2006, 08:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Once we gave away our #1 pick in this years draft, I lost all hope for this team.
and you do know next year the bulls have the option the swap draft picks right? so say the bulls are picking 22 and the knicks are picking 3..guess what? the bulls will be picking 3 and the knicks will be picking 22. soo hows eddy curry for ya`ll?
#23
Posted 22 June 2006 - 09:47 PM
QUOTE (ganggreen_ewok @ Jun 22 2006, 07:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It was a big brouhaha on the Steven A. show, I forget the name. Steven A asked Stephon Marbury who was a better point guard him or Kidd, and Marbury said himself because he is bigger which he isn't, stronger, which he isn't, faster which even after two knee surgeries he isn't, and a better passer. Yes he said he was a more prolific passer. The only thing Marbury has on Kidd is the outside jumper and only by a little bit. So, the next day or so Kidd came on the Steven A. show and reputed Marbury and basically called him an idiot. I got a great laugh out of it.
Go Nets!!
Go Nets!!
Thats the only thing you can do, root for the nets. The knicks are a complete EMBARRASSMENT to the league and to the city of N.Y. My Grandmother could do a better job managing that clusterfuck and she is dead. Wake me up when this nightmare is over. say like 5-8 years if we are lucky.
#28
Posted 23 June 2006 - 12:09 AM
Derrick Coleman hahaha you are hard core how many times has he been waive the past 3 years. Hell yeah, good thing we got rid of Cassell or the past 5 years wouldn't have happened
#29
Posted 23 June 2006 - 11:29 AM
Dolan is the man man who ruined the Knicks. The team was on a path to destruction way before Isiah got here. Two decisions actually ruined the franchise: (1) trading Ewing in the final year of his contract rather than keeping him and freeing up $18 million in cap space and (2) Houston's $100 million contract. Both decisions were made BEFORE Isiah got here and with Dolan heading the Garden with the ouster of Dave Checketts.
Some one in an article put it best, "Isiah inherited a train wreak and then dropped an atom bomb on it." Isiah made matters worse.
On Larry Brown ... I, for one, am not sad to see him gone. As Ian O'Connor wrote, no one has done a worse HC job since Rich Kottite went 1-15. Brown was abysmal. He is a great coach who did an horrendous job. Plus, why can't he just coach for $10 million a year? I always believe that great coaches can coach anybody. Why couldn't Larry just coach the team? They had some talent and players willing to play (Channing Frye, my favorite Knick for example), but Brown seemed like he hated everyone. He'd play Lee for 13 straight games which included a 6 game winning streak and then barely played him for the rest of the season.
Some one in an article put it best, "Isiah inherited a train wreak and then dropped an atom bomb on it." Isiah made matters worse.
On Larry Brown ... I, for one, am not sad to see him gone. As Ian O'Connor wrote, no one has done a worse HC job since Rich Kottite went 1-15. Brown was abysmal. He is a great coach who did an horrendous job. Plus, why can't he just coach for $10 million a year? I always believe that great coaches can coach anybody. Why couldn't Larry just coach the team? They had some talent and players willing to play (Channing Frye, my favorite Knick for example), but Brown seemed like he hated everyone. He'd play Lee for 13 straight games which included a 6 game winning streak and then barely played him for the rest of the season.
<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green"><!--/coloro--><!--sizeo:5--><span style="font-size:18pt;line-height:100%"><!--/sizeo--><b>SCORING MORE THAN YOUR OPPONENTS WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS</b><!--sizec--></span><!--/sizec--><!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->
#31
Posted 28 June 2006 - 09:16 AM
QUOTE (Swissle @ Jun 23 2006, 12:39 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
good for you, it was fun watching the knicks school the shit out of the nets all those years. I guess now you have your revenge...although the Nets now arent nearly as good as the Knicks then...oh man those were the days.
Unfortunately, I'm a Knicks fan. I hate to admit it, but I am, and it sickens me.
Anwyay, come on man, who gives a shit that the Knicks schooled the Nets "all those years"? The Nets won as many titles during that time as the Knicks: ZERO. The only time the Knicks were every truly good and winning championships, the Nets were playing in the ABA!!!
<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green"><!--/coloro--><!--sizeo:5--><span style="font-size:18pt;line-height:100%"><!--/sizeo--><b>SCORING MORE THAN YOUR OPPONENTS WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS</b><!--sizec--></span><!--/sizec--><!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->
#32
Posted 28 June 2006 - 11:17 AM
QUOTE (SMC @ Jun 28 2006, 10:51 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Unfortunately, I'm a Knicks fan. I hate to admit it, but I am, and it sickens me.
Anwyay, come on man, who gives a shit that the Knicks schooled the Nets "all those years"? The Nets won as many titles during that time as the Knicks: ZERO. The only time the Knicks were every truly good and winning championships, the Nets were playing in the ABA!!!
Anwyay, come on man, who gives a shit that the Knicks schooled the Nets "all those years"? The Nets won as many titles during that time as the Knicks: ZERO. The only time the Knicks were every truly good and winning championships, the Nets were playing in the ABA!!!
TRUE!!! hahahahaa
I'm a Knicks fans and me and my codies(boys) always get into heated discussions about the Knicks and I have grown to hate talking about them. It's one thing to have one bad apple in your basket but when 75% of the apples are rotten then what do ya do?.
The Knicks are fvcked from the inside out and right-side in. Dolan all the way down the family tree is disfunctional and they keep make bad decisions thats what scares me. How many times are you going to keep making bad calls. You know that old saying "it's going to get worse before it get's better" the rules apply!.
Latest rumor I heard was the we are going to trade for K.G now I would love for that to happen but will it I don't know.
Anyhow the Knicks suck and are going to continue to suck and that's life. Isaiah has proved he's incompetent and him and Dolan togather make for a great Dumb and Dumberer sequal.
Now it's time for me to run and hide and where my brown paper bag with pride.
#33
Posted 28 June 2006 - 12:50 PM
Hey I just said the Knicks schooled the Nets, I didnt say they were schooling the NBA, which they were except for the Bulls n Rockets. Yea in case you forgot about that guy...uhh...oh yea, Michael Jordan, yea Im pretty sure he was the reason the Knicks didnt get to have a title.
#34
Posted 29 June 2006 - 09:48 AM
QUOTE (Swissle @ Jun 28 2006, 02:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hey I just said the Knicks schooled the Nets, I didnt say they were schooling the NBA, which they were except for the Bulls n Rockets. Yea in case you forgot about that guy...uhh...oh yea, Michael Jordan, yea Im pretty sure he was the reason the Knicks didnt get to have a title.
Dude, they lost the 1994 NBA finals to an inferior Rockets team. Don't use the lame Jordan excuse. They won 60 games in 1993, had home court advantage against the Bulls, and had a 2-0 advantage in the series but because Charles Smith was suck a wimp, he couldn't dunk the ball in the final seconds to win game 5 (why was Ewing on his ass near the foul line during that time anyway?) Plus, in 1995, the Knicks lost to an inferior Pacers team with Ewing's classic finger roll ... finger roll!!!!
<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green"><!--/coloro--><!--sizeo:5--><span style="font-size:18pt;line-height:100%"><!--/sizeo--><b>SCORING MORE THAN YOUR OPPONENTS WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS</b><!--sizec--></span><!--/sizec--><!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->
#35
Posted 29 June 2006 - 01:04 PM
ok, inferior Rockets team...THATS why the won it again the year after. I forgot. Hakeem Olajuwon was a bum...no good at all. Sure the Knicks were frustrating to watch at time, but they still kicked ass and held a ton of respect throughout the league. What are you a Nets fan or something? Even within the past 5 years the Nets have as many titles as the Knicks, so lets not even go there.
#36
Posted 29 June 2006 - 01:56 PM
QUOTE (Swissle @ Jun 29 2006, 02:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
ok, inferior Rockets team...THATS why the won it again the year after. I forgot. Hakeem Olajuwon was a bum...no good at all. Sure the Knicks were frustrating to watch at time, but they still kicked ass and held a ton of respect throughout the league. What are you a Nets fan or something? Even within the past 5 years the Nets have as many titles as the Knicks, so lets not even go there.
Swissle, did you even watch the NBA in 1995?
No, I'm not a Net fan smart guy. What I am is a self-loathing Knick fan who thinks it's bullshit for any self-respecting Knick fan to pass off the failures of the 1990s as some sort of great success. Dumbass Dave Checketts use to do that and it pissed the fans off. The Knicks had a HOF HC, and a Top 50 franchise player, the best defensive team in the NBA for 4 straight years and still couldn't win the championship. The Knicks were good enough to win 2 titles in that time but came up empty handed.
What has happened these last 5 years is an abomination, but that cannot elevate by comparison what happened in the 1990s to a level of great success. It was not. "Kicked ass" and "ton of respect" is not a consolation prize for losing to inferior teams in the playoffs and failing to win a championship.
<!--coloro:green--><span style="color:green"><!--/coloro--><!--sizeo:5--><span style="font-size:18pt;line-height:100%"><!--/sizeo--><b>SCORING MORE THAN YOUR OPPONENTS WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS</b><!--sizec--></span><!--/sizec--><!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->
#37
Posted 01 July 2006 - 02:38 AM
Alright well you raise an interesting point. BUT, lets not forget about Big Shot Bob Horry, or Vernon Maxwell and Sam Cassell. All really solid role players who could knock down open jumpers. You know Cassell has game, and with The Dream on your side, your money. Hakeem was the only other bigman that gave Ewing a run for his money...I include Shaq on that list, Ewing used to own him.

Sign In
Register
Help

This topic is locked

MultiQuote



















