Vikings | Team unlikely to re-sign Richardson
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:37:18 -0800 Judd Zulgad, of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, reports the Minnesota Vikings are unlikely to re-sign FB Tony Richardson. Richardson will become an unrestricted free agent Thursday, Feb. 28, at 11 p.m.
Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Page 1 of 1
Tony Richardson Not Expected Back With Vikes
#2
Posted 28 February 2008 - 10:25 PM
QUOTE (S-Dubb @ Feb 28 2008, 01:22 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Vikings | Team unlikely to re-sign Richardson
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:37:18 -0800 Judd Zulgad, of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, reports the Minnesota Vikings are unlikely to re-sign FB Tony Richardson. Richardson will become an unrestricted free agent Thursday, Feb. 28, at 11 p.m.
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:37:18 -0800 Judd Zulgad, of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, reports the Minnesota Vikings are unlikely to re-sign FB Tony Richardson. Richardson will become an unrestricted free agent Thursday, Feb. 28, at 11 p.m.
richardson and neal were both cut? they are the 2 best blocking FBs. i'd love either one, they would immediately up out run game
Get it done MT
#4
Posted 28 February 2008 - 10:54 PM
QUOTE (ganggreen_ewok @ Feb 28 2008, 07:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
We didn't use much of the standard blocking fullback, this is the least of our concerns.
its cause we didn't have one
Get it done MT
#6
Posted 28 February 2008 - 11:38 PM
QUOTE (ganggreen_ewok @ Feb 28 2008, 08:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Nah it's because the offense Schotty runs doesn't call for one. Reason why we cut Sowell in favor of BJ Askew
then why did we sign hodgins?
Get it done MT
Page 1 of 1

Sign In
Register
Help

This topic is locked




MultiQuote





