NYJetsFan.com Forums: Just Curious - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

2014 NYJetsFan Fantasy League sign up: http://nyjetsfan.com...showtopic=38425
santana Icon : (16 August 2014 - 11:55 PM) Gotta fix that
azjetfan Icon : (17 August 2014 - 01:35 PM) Is anyone else as concerned as I am about the secondary?
azjetfan Icon : (17 August 2014 - 01:36 PM) I know it's preseason and all but even with Milliner in on the first game we gave up a TD on the first drive to the Colts
azjetfan Icon : (17 August 2014 - 01:37 PM) Patterson looked like me out there and Wilson got torched last night
Smedsthejet Icon : (17 August 2014 - 02:26 PM) Concerned about the right side of the OLine too - too many penalties and Giacomini wasn't that much better than against the Colts when he was poor
SackExchange71 Icon : (17 August 2014 - 02:31 PM) Imo i still think howard is better then giacomini..Wish they never let him walk.Giacomini had alot of flags in seattle also
azjetfan Icon : (18 August 2014 - 09:33 AM) Howard recieved a huge contract in Oakland. Way over his actual value.
azjetfan Icon : (18 August 2014 - 10:08 AM) So did we make a trade for a CB yet?
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (18 August 2014 - 03:51 PM) Milliner did suffer a high ankle sprain, that sucks. could linger all year
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (18 August 2014 - 03:52 PM) I think Patterson sucked vs the Colts because he was injured, which he always is.
Mr_Jet Icon : (18 August 2014 - 06:49 PM) As much as people criticized Tannanbaum for spending too much. It's starting to look like Idzik is going to be too cheap.
Mr_Jet Icon : (18 August 2014 - 06:52 PM) You get what you pay for and when you let quality players go because you don't want to pay them, this is what happens. You're left with scrub players.
azjetfan Icon : (18 August 2014 - 07:55 PM) I'm still on board with the Idzik plan. Even with Revis and Revis we still are not going to the SB this year. But the down time sucks. If Milliner comes back healthy by week 3 or so we should be fine.
Mr_Jet Icon : (18 August 2014 - 08:18 PM) Regardless of our SB chances this year or next year. If Idzik keeps acting like a cheapskate and continues to let quality players go, we won't have to worry about winning much of anything this decade.
azjetfan Icon : (18 August 2014 - 09:36 PM) He wants to build through the draft. Not blow the bank on FA. I get what your saying but there is a balance and right now we are not one or two pieces away.
Mr_Jet Icon : (18 August 2014 - 11:00 PM) It's not about being one or two pieces away. It's about keeping the good pieces you have and building upon that.
Mr_Jet Icon : (18 August 2014 - 11:04 PM) But there is no sense in trying to build through the draft if he's only going to end up letting the good players he picks up go in FA after a few years. All because he wants to do things on the cheap.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (19 August 2014 - 07:02 AM) FIRE IDZIK
azjetfan Icon : (19 August 2014 - 08:33 AM) out side of Revis who left we should have kept?
azjetfan Icon : (19 August 2014 - 08:34 AM) The Revis deal sucks but $16 million was too much for a CB and once he was gone he was not coming back.
Mr_Jet Icon : (19 August 2014 - 11:00 AM) Matt Slauson
azjetfan Icon : (19 August 2014 - 01:00 PM) Eh. I think with our current cap situation we will be able to retain guys like Wilkerson and whomever we want to keep. We are in a good position right now.
Mr_Jet Icon : (19 August 2014 - 01:49 PM) Time will tell.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (19 August 2014 - 02:00 PM) landed revis abck. got DRC, nope we take patterson who got owned and always hurt. milner always hurt. 3rd round CB done for season. were gonna get passed on all day
azjetfan Icon : (19 August 2014 - 02:44 PM) Yea the DRC bit makes me iffy
Jetsfan115 Icon : (19 August 2014 - 03:35 PM) better then patterson
azjetfan Icon : (19 August 2014 - 05:45 PM) No I mean the fact that he whiffed on him.
azjetfan Icon : (19 August 2014 - 05:46 PM) I'm not saying Idzik is perfect. I just like the direction we are heading. It's going to take some patience.
RetireChrebet Icon : (19 August 2014 - 06:27 PM) I like how our lack of secondary is the hot topic right now. The bigger issue is we still will not be able to throw the ball. We are not going to do much of anything regardless until we get a QB. Sorry for being so negative just my honest opinion.
RetireChrebet Icon : (19 August 2014 - 06:29 PM) With that said I think our running game with CJ and Powell will be top 10 or somewhere around there
Jetsfan115 Icon : (19 August 2014 - 06:35 PM) i have faith that if geno messes up that vick can come in and do well. but i have 0 faith in our secondary right now which has been our strong point for the past 4 years or so
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2014 - 07:35 PM) I agree 115. but the one thing is Rex has done some good things in the past with shitty DBs and still had a solid D going back to his years in BAL
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2014 - 07:37 PM) Corey Ivy CB
36 Jim Leonhard SS/PR
43 Haruki Nakamura FS
25 Evan Oglesby CB
20 Ed Reed FS
22 Samari Rolle CB
39 Daren Stone FS
41 Frank Walker CB
31 Fabian Washington in 2008
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2014 - 07:39 PM) Reed is a HOF but Rolle was way past his prime
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2014 - 07:41 PM) SNOOPY BOWL FRIDAY!!!
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2014 - 07:41 PM) WOOOOOOOOOOOOO
azjetfan Icon : (19 August 2014 - 08:26 PM) I assume we will pick up a guy after the cuts happen.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (19 August 2014 - 10:14 PM) we'll see but I think we see better QB play than we have in a while.
518-JeTS-FaN Icon : (Yesterday, 08:54 AM) disgusted with my local programming, instead of jets and giants they are airing the raiders vs packers..wtf
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Yesterday, 09:23 AM) Glad I don't live up there anymore haha
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:59 PM) The JETS are #6 in the Forbes List for most franchise value
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:59 PM) The Buffalo Jills are #31 and the Miami Dolphags are #16 respectively
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 07:00 PM) The JETS are worth $1.8 billion
jet-man Icon : (Yesterday, 10:03 PM) that's less than the clippers
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Today, 01:07 PM) I'm very excited with the amount of preseason touchdowns the Jets have
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

Just Curious who do you think would win

#1 User is offline   kenxnice Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 946
  • Joined: 22-September 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 18 January 2007 - 01:25 PM

who do you think would win let say if the worst team in the NFL play 1 of the top 5 team in college or the top team in college, i know it'll never happen but just a curious thought what happen if USC or ohio state was to play the raiders or another very low ranking team in the NFL
"can you feel whats about to happen on this field, can ya'll feel thay?"
0

#2 User is offline   DewayneDontSign Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,979
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Location:Long Island

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 18 January 2007 - 01:33 PM

the NFL team would win by 7 or more TD's
0

#3 User is offline   HurricaneJet32 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,693
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Location:New York

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 18 January 2007 - 02:04 PM

QUOTE (DewayneDontSign @ Jan 18 2007, 02:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
the NFL team would win by 7 or more TD's


Yeah...it isn't even close...it would be total domination...
Posted Image
0

#4 User is offline   kenxnice Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 946
  • Joined: 22-September 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 18 January 2007 - 02:11 PM

but why?? isn't the best team in college just as fast?? i'm pretty sure they could stand a chance
"can you feel whats about to happen on this field, can ya'll feel thay?"
0

#5 User is offline   JetsOhFive Icon

  • Free Agent
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 667
  • Joined: 10-July 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NJ/Las Vegas

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 18 January 2007 - 02:39 PM

I posed this question a year ago about whether or not USC could beat the Jets. But I think about it now, and you have to realize that really any NFL team has the best players from college. Except they've gotten stronger and a bit faster. So I'd say an NFL team would win by 2 scores.
Posted Image
0

#6 User is offline   Maynard13 Icon

  • 2005 Best Signature
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,142
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 18 January 2007 - 02:46 PM

I say that 96 times out of 100 the NFL would win..and by over 28


0

#7 User is offline   NYJBlueHen Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 693
  • Joined: 25-April 05
  • Location:Jersey

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 18 January 2007 - 02:52 PM

I'd say the worst NFL team would destroy the best college team, it would be unfair and dangerous for the college players.
0

#8 User is offline   VaNDelaYInDusTrIEs Icon

  • 06 R.O.Y. Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 12-September 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Back in the Jerz

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 18 January 2007 - 03:02 PM

Yeah, I'd have to agree. Even the worst team in the pros (raiders) is still much better than any college team could ever be. That's not to minimize how bad the raiders actually are though. They really suck.
0

#9 User is offline   felner Icon

  • Free Agent
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 35
  • Joined: 05-April 05
  • Location:NEW JERSEY
  • Interests:football,sports in general,bowling,

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 18 January 2007 - 04:10 PM

QUOTE (VaNDelaYInDusTrIEs @ Jan 18 2007, 04:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yeah, I'd have to agree. Even the worst team in the pros (raiders) is still much better than any college team could ever be. That's not to minimize how bad the raiders actually are though. They really suck.

I have to agree with everybody, but add this wrinkle say the college's elite( like the proball in the nfl) are put together it may cause a few headaches.
0

#10 User is offline   kobeskool Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,925
  • Joined: 13-November 06
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 18 January 2007 - 04:29 PM

the nfl team would win their players on much stronger and faster then the college player
0

#11 User is offline   ManginiIsMyHero Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 831
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Location:Brewster, NY. Currently PSU
  • Interests:Jets Football, Mets Baseball, parties, gaming, and programming.

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 18 January 2007 - 06:01 PM

Perfect example is Reggie Bush. He ran over the best of the best in College in his senior year. And yet in his first few games in the NFL he not only did jack he really got overmatched. He eventually got better as he and his team adjusted and got stronger. I think my point is clear.
I changed my name, but I dont remember what it was... if anyone remembers please let me know.
0

#12 User is offline   JetsOhFive Icon

  • Free Agent
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 667
  • Joined: 10-July 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NJ/Las Vegas

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 18 January 2007 - 06:10 PM

QUOTE (felner @ Jan 18 2007, 04:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I have to agree with everybody, but add this wrinkle say the college's elite( like the proball in the nfl) are put together it may cause a few headaches.

Actually that would make it worse. The chemistry would be non existent and we know how bad a lack of chemistry can be from recent USA basketball teams.
Posted Image
0

#13 User is offline   LocoJet Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,651
  • Joined: 30-March 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 18 January 2007 - 06:24 PM

i was wondering this when USC was dominating a few years ago. it would have been USC vs. the 49ers. i think USC would have won.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users