NYJetsFan.com Forums: Name Problems - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

RIP Joe McKnight
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:05 PM) 2nd and 3
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:06 PM) f***
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:06 PM) grounding
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:07 PM) 3rd and 11
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:07 PM) Nice job guys
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:07 PM) Really
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:10 PM) LETS GO D!!!
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:11 PM) 2nd and 10
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:11 PM) Yep
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:11 PM) here we go
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:12 PM) COME ON D
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:12 PM) PLEASE
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:12 PM) We arent going to keep them out of FG range'
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:12 PM) we have to keep them out of the end zone
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:13 PM) 2nd and 10
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:13 PM) 3rd and 10
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:13 PM) LETS GO D!!!
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:14 PM) 3RD AND 4
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:14 PM) I bet they go for it
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:14 PM) COME ON D!!!
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:15 PM) SHIT!!!!
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:15 PM) THAT WAS THE PLAY
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:15 PM) WE SUCK
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:15 PM) WIDE OPEN
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:18 PM) FIRE THE WHOLE DEFENSE
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:19 PM) Bubba from forest gump has that blank dumb stare
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:20 PM) COME ON FITZ
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:21 PM) THAT SHOULDNT STAND
ganggreen2003 Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:21 PM) his foot was out of bounds
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:21 PM) WELL THATS A BREAK
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:22 PM) 75 yards away
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:23 PM) Thats not gonna do it'
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:23 PM) 2nd and 4
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:24 PM) f*** YOU RYAN FITZPATRICK
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:25 PM) YOU SORRY SON OF A BITCH
ganggreen2003 Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:26 PM) it keeps us in the hunt for a top 5 pick
ganggreen2003 Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:26 PM) I'm glad we lost
ganggreen2003 Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:26 PM) we need to get a top 5 pick in the draft
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:26 PM) COME ON D!!!
Jetsfan115 Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:28 PM) Good job fitz. Way to keep us at the fifth overall pick
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:28 PM) AND DO WHAT WITH IT?????
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:29 PM) What the f*** are we going to take
at 5?????
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:30 PM) They will just take another f***ing D player
MikeGangGree... Icon : (27 November 2016 - 07:31 PM) Like Peppers
ganggreen2003 Icon : (28 November 2016 - 08:21 AM) We better NOT bring MEvis back next season he's clearly past his prime
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Name Problems Redskins Name Battle

#1 User is offline   Chaos Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 3,189
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 April 2005 - 06:50 AM

something interesting i found online...what do u guys think


Legal battle over Redskins name continues

By BRETT ZONGKER, Associated Press Writer
April 8, 2005

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Major American Indian groups went to court Friday trying to revoke the Washington Redskins' trademark name, calling it a disparaging reference to millions of people.

Four national organizations joined a District of Columbia resident who sued in 1992 to pressure the team to drop the Redskins moniker because they consider it offensive. But a team lawyer argued that the appeal should be dismissed because the legal complaints weren't filed until decades after the name was first adopted in 1933.

``This football team has been on actual notice from 1972 that Native Americans found this name offensive,'' attorney Thomas Morrison, representing the American Indian groups, told the U.S. Court of Appeals. ``I don't think we'd be hearing this debate if it were a different ethnic group.''

Suzan Shown Harjo, one of the original plaintiffs, won the first round in 1999 when a U.S. Patent and Trademark Office panel canceled the Redskins' trademarks. But a federal judge reversed that decision last year, ruling the panel relied on flawed data.

``We should not be the only group that the law allows discrimination against,'' said Harjo, president of the Morningstar Institute, an American Indian rights group.

Team lawyer Robert Raskopf said that ``redskin'' wasn't considered offensive when the trademark was first issued to the football franchise in 1967. He said at that time, there was no substantial evidence that the term was offensive.

But Raskopf maintained that it was important to distinguish between how a dictionary defines a word and the way a word is actually used. He said the team has never used its name in a disparaging way.

The Washington Redskins were originally the Boston Braves, but owner George Preston Marshall changed the name to Redskins in 1933 to avoid confusion with the local baseball team. The team moved to Washington four years later.

For 40 years the team operated without a trademark on its name, and it could go on using the name without a trademark, said Judge A. Raymond Randolph. Trademarks allow the team to control distribution of team merchandise, and Randolph said the consequence of revoking the trademark could be a proliferation of Redskins apparel.

``The effect could be to spread the term even further,'' Randolph said.

A ruling could come at any time, but the three judge panel typically issues a decision before the current term ends in July.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users