NYJetsFan.com Forums: Name Problems - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

Jets get dismantled in KC
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 05:59 PM) No more screens just chuck it down field
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:00 PM) 1st down
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:00 PM) LETS GO
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:00 PM) Jalen!
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:01 PM) Jeeeeeeeez
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:01 PM) wow
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:01 PM) 2nd and 10
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:01 PM) Drop
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:01 PM) 3rd and 10
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:01 PM) CMON O WTF
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:02 PM) THE GUYS IN RED ARE NOT ON OUR TEAM!!!!!!
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:02 PM) 4th and the game
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:03 PM) Terrible throw
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:03 PM) another f***ing pick
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:03 PM) Good job Fitz Right to the DB
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:03 PM) From player of the week to trash
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:03 PM) wtf fitzpatrick
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:03 PM) 6 trunovers
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:05 PM) What a shit game
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:05 PM) absolute trash
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:08 PM) already burned all 3 timeouts too
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:08 PM) AWFUCKINL
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:09 PM) Really had no choice
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:10 PM) WOW
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:10 PM) Life as a jets fan
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:10 PM) ..........................................................
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:10 PM) another f***ing pick 6
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:11 PM) 7 turnovers
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:11 PM) we had 9 days
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:11 PM) and we play like this?
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:11 PM) 9 fuckin days
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:12 PM) 9 NINE NINE FUCKIN DAYS
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:12 PM) Take all the starters out atleast
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:13 PM) Ryan Shitspatrick showed up today
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:14 PM) Good thing I don't drink during JETS games I'd be in an alcohol coma today
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:17 PM) Another pick
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:17 PM) 6 picks
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:17 PM) 6 f***ing INT's
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:18 PM) 8 turnovers. Most since 1975
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:20 PM) we don't deserve to be considered good
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:20 PM) we are a clusterfuck
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:49 PM) This was a horrible effort by the team
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:49 PM) they had 10 days to prepare and still shit themselves on the field
canuckfan Icon : (Today, 06:25 AM) Jets fans finding out what the fans of Fitzy's previous teams already knew. Game manager at best; QB disaster-area at worst. Time to cultivate Bryce Petty or write the season off. We are behind in the conference tie breakers already as it will surely come down to that if we are to make a wild card. Yesterday was one of those games where I didn't even have the slightest feeling they were going to come back.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 04:03 PM) Jets claim TE Austin Seferian-Jenkins on waivers
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Name Problems Redskins Name Battle

#1 User is offline   Chaos Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 3,189
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 April 2005 - 06:50 AM

something interesting i found online...what do u guys think


Legal battle over Redskins name continues

By BRETT ZONGKER, Associated Press Writer
April 8, 2005

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Major American Indian groups went to court Friday trying to revoke the Washington Redskins' trademark name, calling it a disparaging reference to millions of people.

Four national organizations joined a District of Columbia resident who sued in 1992 to pressure the team to drop the Redskins moniker because they consider it offensive. But a team lawyer argued that the appeal should be dismissed because the legal complaints weren't filed until decades after the name was first adopted in 1933.

``This football team has been on actual notice from 1972 that Native Americans found this name offensive,'' attorney Thomas Morrison, representing the American Indian groups, told the U.S. Court of Appeals. ``I don't think we'd be hearing this debate if it were a different ethnic group.''

Suzan Shown Harjo, one of the original plaintiffs, won the first round in 1999 when a U.S. Patent and Trademark Office panel canceled the Redskins' trademarks. But a federal judge reversed that decision last year, ruling the panel relied on flawed data.

``We should not be the only group that the law allows discrimination against,'' said Harjo, president of the Morningstar Institute, an American Indian rights group.

Team lawyer Robert Raskopf said that ``redskin'' wasn't considered offensive when the trademark was first issued to the football franchise in 1967. He said at that time, there was no substantial evidence that the term was offensive.

But Raskopf maintained that it was important to distinguish between how a dictionary defines a word and the way a word is actually used. He said the team has never used its name in a disparaging way.

The Washington Redskins were originally the Boston Braves, but owner George Preston Marshall changed the name to Redskins in 1933 to avoid confusion with the local baseball team. The team moved to Washington four years later.

For 40 years the team operated without a trademark on its name, and it could go on using the name without a trademark, said Judge A. Raymond Randolph. Trademarks allow the team to control distribution of team merchandise, and Randolph said the consequence of revoking the trademark could be a proliferation of Redskins apparel.

``The effect could be to spread the term even further,'' Randolph said.

A ruling could come at any time, but the three judge panel typically issues a decision before the current term ends in July.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users