NYJetsFan.com Forums: Lateral Not Fumble - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

SECRETS AND LIES NOTHING BUT SECRETS AND LIES!!
2JBallar01 Icon : (Today, 11:36 AM) 5th rounder going to Bears
2JBallar01 Icon : (Today, 11:37 AM) Probably means no Cooper or White now. Hopefully that trade with Eagles happens and we trade down
santana Icon : (Today, 11:51 AM) Cooper is pooper
santana Icon : (Today, 11:51 AM) need cutler
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Today, 11:51 AM) Raiders are taking cooper
santana Icon : (Today, 11:51 AM) 2010 me is so excited
santana Icon : (Today, 11:53 AM) http://i.imgur.com/ZD7ljLV.gif
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 01:39 PM) So with the legal tampering period starting tomorrow who are we targeting?
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 01:40 PM) I am sure Maxwell, Cro McCourtney will be rumored but who else?
Chaos Icon : (Today, 01:49 PM) revis?
Chaos Icon : (Today, 01:49 PM) hopefully some linemen
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Today, 01:50 PM) FIRE MACCAGNAN
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:10 PM) FIRE BOWLES!
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:12 PM) Mike Iupati?
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:13 PM) Bryan Bulaga?
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:13 PM) Orlando Franklin had a great year at Guard last year
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Today, 02:20 PM) TRADE MARSHALL
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Today, 02:21 PM) CUT WILKERSON
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Today, 02:21 PM) MOVE TO LA
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Today, 02:21 PM) Would love any of those 3
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Today, 02:22 PM) Iupati for sure though
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:25 PM) From my understanding Snacks is a RFA? So we can match whatever deal he is offered?
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:26 PM) So we need to Address the O-line and HB depth on Offense.
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:26 PM) The secondary and OLB on D
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:27 PM) We have a shit pot of Money and 5 picks.
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:27 PM) I hope Gailey can fix this Offense.
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:28 PM) I feel like I am ranting like GG2003
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:29 PM) FIRE HARRIS!
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:46 PM) We can get all the weapons we can get to load the weapon but until the JETS have a QB
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:46 PM) we will be wasting talent
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:46 PM) and the worst thing in life is WASTED TALENT!!! - A BRONX TALE
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 04:08 PM) One of the most positive things that this Marshall signing brings is Amaro getting more balls thrown to him
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 04:08 PM) and we'll finally have legitimate size at WR in the redzone
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 04:08 PM) but still the biggest issue is QB
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 04:09 PM) we can get monsters at WR but without a QB to throw them the ball, it's a waste of talent
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 04:30 PM) Or maybe its a waste of a QB with no WRs to throw to.
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Today, 04:53 PM) Or anyone to block for him
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 05:17 PM) fire em all
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 05:37 PM) Get pumped that we have actual wr talent now
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 06:25 PM) being that the JETS haven't had a WR go over 1,000 yards since 2007 when J-CO did it, is pretty indicative how bad our WR corps and subsequently our QB play has been
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 06:27 PM) and that was Chad's last year as a NEW YORK JET
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 06:35 PM) and as far as Harris getting re-signed the only good thing is he is not going to end up with the bills other than that...he's not worth 15 mil guaranteed
santana Icon : (Today, 08:30 PM) FIRE MARSHALL
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Today, 08:46 PM) TRADE RAUL
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Today, 08:46 PM) DIRTY STREET THUG
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Lateral Not Fumble

#1 User is offline   TheGreenCoachesClub Icon

  • Pro Bowl
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 525
  • Joined: 25-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Westfield NJ

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 04:35 PM

since that play never came infront of the line of scrimmage, and it was initself a backwards pass, wouldn't that be considered a lateral? then wouldn't that then be challangeable?
0

#2 User is offline   socaljetsfan Icon

  • Pro Bowl
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 519
  • Joined: 01-August 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 04:37 PM

Ya that play makes no sense, but good teams answer back like that.

"No sugar? Damn. Y'all ain't never got two things that match. Either y'all got Kool-aid, no sugar. Peanut butter, no jelly. Ham, no burger. Daaamn." -Smokey
0

#3 User is offline   jetfan4life12 Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,139
  • Joined: 04-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boca Raton, FL

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 04:46 PM

QUOTE (FroNTROw50yRdLyNe @ Nov 30 2008, 04:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
since that play never came infront of the line of scrimmage, and it was initself a backwards pass, wouldn't that be considered a lateral? then wouldn't that then be challangeable?

who in their right mind calls that play with 89 who has not ran that play in the rain in your own territory. Also. what is up with 27, all he had to do was push him OB
0

#4 User is offline   socaljetsfan Icon

  • Pro Bowl
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 519
  • Joined: 01-August 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 04:55 PM

Wat the hell is up with the defense?

"No sugar? Damn. Y'all ain't never got two things that match. Either y'all got Kool-aid, no sugar. Peanut butter, no jelly. Ham, no burger. Daaamn." -Smokey
0

#5 User is offline   ganggreen2003 Icon

  • NO FAT CHICKS
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,319
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Warwick, RI
  • Interests:J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS
    NY YANKEES
    SYRACUSE ORANGE
    AND ANYTHING NEW YORK

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 08:04 PM

The one question I have is why was the play when Denver scored on the "Fumble" when it was obvious Jerricho was down by contact I didn't have volume at the bar cause well I live in f*cking Petriots country but what was the ruling on that play and why was the play not overturned when it was obvious that JC was down...
Posted Image
Posted Image

Well YOU BETTER BLEED GREEN & WHITE!!!!

https://twitter.com/#!/NYJ_Rob3136

http://www.facebook....47353176?v=wall

http://www.nyjetsfan.../gg03on1050.mp3

S-Dubb: like if she was giving me a handjob and I saw that thumb I don't know how I'd react
0

#6 User is offline   titmouse Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 263
  • Joined: 20-August 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Long island

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 30 November 2008 - 08:15 PM

QUOTE (ganggreen2003 @ Nov 30 2008, 08:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The one question I have is why was the play when Denver scored on the "Fumble" when it was obvious Jerricho was down by contact I didn't have volume at the bar cause well I live in f*cking Petriots country but what was the ruling on that play and why was the play not overturned when it was obvious that JC was down...



They said the play was not reviewable. To me, it looked like he was down and had control of the ball, the instant the guy touches him the play should be called dead. I guess the refs on the field felt the ball was still loose.
0

#7 User is offline   gmany3k Icon

  • Old Timer
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,301
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:AUSTIN,TX MALE member 2000-01

  • NFL Team:

Posted 01 December 2008 - 08:43 AM

Can't wait to hear this one explained to me .down by contact just like when they fumbled in the last qtr did we throw fists in there ? no a tap on the back because the ball was already recovered and the man was not advancing the ball.
that was the sign right there that anything goes.......full time refs?
21ST CENTURY NEW YORK STATE OF MIND ."REST IN PEACE NIGHT OWL TOM"Use Caution when reading my comments>.Posted Image
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users