NYJetsFan.com Forums: Super Disadvantage In The Super Bowl For The Jets? - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

ganggreen2003 Icon : (21 April 2015 - 07:52 PM) Week 5 Bye after the London Game against the Dolphags
NJAzrael71 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 09:17 AM) Rivers is likely going to Tennessee. Would LOVE to have him here but we likely won't make the trade. I'd easily give this year and next year
NJAzrael71 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 09:17 AM) 's first rounder for him
azjetfan Icon : (22 April 2015 - 11:03 AM) IMO that's a steep price. I would swap this years first and a conditional 1st next year. Assuming we make the AFC Championship. That would be a 28-32nd pick. Otherwise a second.
MikeGangGree... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 01:07 PM) Yes 2 1st is a lot
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 01:10 PM) draft is next week, pumped
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 03:02 PM) What are thoughts on getting a RB in round 1? McShay's newest mock has us taking Gurley at 6. I don't think we should take him that high, but if we trade down and he's available I'd love to snag him, ACL and all. He's got an unreal skill set that, once healthy, will translate readily to the NFL. We're not getting a QB this year without paying a king's ransom, and unless we pay a ransom for a top guy I say ignore QB. I don't want us to take a Hundley or Petty type in the 2nd or 3rd round when we need other pieces (edge rush, OL)
azjetfan Icon : (22 April 2015 - 03:09 PM) We can probably get Gordon in the second. I would pass at 6. If QB is not available a pass rusher will be. Our biggest needs are QB Pass rusher and Oline.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 03:34 PM) any thourghts on shane ray? i see a lot of mocks have us drafting him
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 04:35 PM) last one i seen had us taking cooper, a RB, and hundley for our 1st 3 picks. not thrilled about that
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 04:38 PM) I don't like Gordon much. Not much of a receiver or blocker, ball security issues, tries to bounce outside too much, stuffed frequently. Gurley is in a league of his own
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 04:39 PM) Ray is pretty highly regarded. I'm betting he, Dupree, and Gregory will be our best options as well as edge rushers at 6, but I think that's too high for any of them
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 04:43 PM) Personally love Cooper, I know WR isn't our biggest need but he may be the most NFL ready guy in the Draft. If we stick to the 6th pick and Fowler, Beasley, and Mariota are gone, Cooper is the guy to get. I'd even take him over Beasley
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 05:45 PM) i don't mind cooper. decker isn't number 1 IMO and marshall is expensive and getting old
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 05:45 PM) and we never draft a WR high
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 05:45 PM) but o-line and QB are huge needs. i wouldn't take o-line 6th overall, but i think our 2nd or 3rd should be o-line
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 05:46 PM) we need an OLB as well. if we don't land a QB i'd like to see OLB adn O-line with 2 of our top 3 picks
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 08:16 PM) I agree on Deck, not a true #1 and he's had a checkered history with injuries. Marshall has 2, maybe 3 productive years left, which is why Cooper is an option
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 08:17 PM) And I agree with you on edge rusher & OL being bigger needs, but there really isn't a lineman I'd take at 6
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 08:19 PM) So the way I see it, assuming Winston and Mariota are taken when we're at 6, that Fowler and Cooper are our best choices, and I'd be stunned if Fowler drops. I wouldn't be surprised (or upset) if we land Cooper
NJAzrael71 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 08:47 PM) Apparently Tennessee wanted both of Cleveland's #1's and their 2nd rounder to move up to the #2 spot to get Mariota. Still think two 1st rounders are too much for Rivers? He makes us instant contenders and if we make a deep playoff run, it would really be this year's 1st and what equates to basically a 2nd rounder next year.
If not, get Cooper in the 1st and then grab Hundley in the 2nd and O-line in the 3rd.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:05 PM) I wouldn't be upset with Cooper, hes a stud
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:06 PM) Not sure about Ray. Dupree is rising on the draft boards, ridiculously athletic for his size
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:07 PM) Dupree is 6'4 270 and has a amazing get off and runs a 4.5
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:09 PM) Problem is he doesn't have big sack numbers in college, I rather draft a productive guy high
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:09 PM) Vic Beasley is insanely athletic as well and was hugely productive in college, good bet is that Beasley will be a 10+ sack guy in the NFL
NJAzrael71 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:12 PM) Beasley should be a stud but he gets caught up hand fighting if he doesn't beat his guy quickly. He'll likely end up as an OLB but we'll see
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:15 PM) He'd be a good fit in our defense, because we could use that speed guy on the outside
Chadforpresi... Icon : (23 April 2015 - 06:27 AM) I'd love Rivers, but we should be able to get him without paying 2 first rounders
Chadforpresi... Icon : (23 April 2015 - 06:29 AM) Lot of buzz about Dupree going top 10, most mocks I see have us getting either Ray or Dupree at 6. I prefer Dupree, like you said insane athlete for his size
Chadforpresi... Icon : (23 April 2015 - 06:30 AM) I like Beasley as well but I have a strong feeling Washington will snag him. But he is a small dude, it'd be nice if he'd add some bulk (in Clemson reportedly played around 230)
Chaos Icon : (23 April 2015 - 10:11 AM) @ArifHasanNFL

.@LanceZierlein says on http://sports790.com that Shane Ray will need surgery on foot, 5 months recovery. "Could drop out of first"
Chaos Icon : (23 April 2015 - 10:14 AM) this should change up the top 10
Chadforpresi... Icon : (23 April 2015 - 12:16 PM) Damn that's big. If he drops out of round 1 that could be a massive bargain for whoever gets him round 2. Dupree now looks more like the edge rusher we'd get at 6
MikeGangGree... Icon : (24 April 2015 - 09:40 PM) TEH RANGERS
santana Icon : (24 April 2015 - 11:32 PM) TEH WIZ
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:57 AM) Teh Suarez
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:58 AM) Vic Beasley is all speed. No moves, no power. Straight up the field. Could have some big games, then nothing in the next
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:59 AM) If we don't get Mariota, we should be looking at Schreff or trading down, IMO.
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:59 AM) A lot of good edge rushers in this draft... I wouldn't want to take Dupree that high.
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 07:00 AM) Until next time fellas!
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 01:19 PM) Helloooooooooo
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 01:19 PM) Bueller
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 01:33 PM) Manish says the Jets should trade down and draft Andrus Peat round 1
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 04:39 PM) Even an idiot can say something that's right every now and then
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Super Disadvantage In The Super Bowl For The Jets? The game format is not suited for smash mouth football

#1 User is offline   NCtexasjets Icon

  • Free Agent
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 47
  • Joined: 21-September 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Home of Crazy Water- Texas

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 18 January 2010 - 05:14 PM

Let me just say the brand of football the Jets have played this year is the type of football i love most. Give me a good low scoring game with defensive drama with key offensive plays peppered though out. I thought he 4th and 1 drama at the end of yesterdays game is a great example of what I'm speaking of.

Games like the Packer/Card's game in the WC round bore me in comparison. Unfortunately the NFL as well as the majority of fans think otherwise.

The Super Bowl is one event that will not allow Jet football to thrive because of the number of breaks and length of time it takes to play that game compared to normal game. Our strength is based on controlling both lines of scrimmage, especially on the offensive side and my fear is it will be harder to wear out either the of the NFC lines no mater if it's the Vikings or the Saints like we have seen the Jets do so far in the playoffs.

I just hope if we get to play the game some adjustments can be made on our part offensively. The breaks the other teams defenses will get leave our style of football at a disadvantage.

What do you guys think, am i just paranoid or what? :Cool:
0

#2 User is offline   TimmyLamJones Icon

  • "06 Top 10 Donator"/06 Best Insider Award
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,641
  • Joined: 07-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Orange County, CA

  • NFL Team:

Posted 18 January 2010 - 06:38 PM

I think it can work both ways.

It could also take a potent offense out of their rhythm.

See : Rams 2002, Raiders 2003, Seahawks 2006, Patriots 2008

Those were all high flying teams....that good defenses held in check!
0

#3 User is offline   SoReALSoJetS Icon

  • Drafted Rookie
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 116
  • Joined: 03-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:los angeles
  • Interests:THE JETS

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 18 January 2010 - 06:58 PM

dude we will win
"SO REAL SO JETS"
Posted Image
0

#4 User is offline   gmany3k Icon

  • Old Timer
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,302
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:AUSTIN,TX MALE member 2000-01

  • NFL Team:

Posted 19 January 2010 - 12:35 AM

The breaks the other teams defenses will get leave our style of football at a disadvantage.
please elaborate .

If you are saying that the NFL wants to get all games won inside the 2 minutes and high scoring than yes you are correct.
21ST CENTURY NEW YORK STATE OF MIND ."REST IN PEACE NIGHT OWL TOM"Use Caution when reading my comments>.Posted Image
0

#5 User is offline   S-Dubb Icon

  • 2008 Best Insider Award
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 31,145
  • Joined: 02-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:---
  • Interests:Hardcore Jets & Knicks fan - Gym rat - health and nutrition - family man and proud father.

    Twitter: @NYJETSFANCOM

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 19 January 2010 - 12:43 AM

The Charger game was a disadvantage, the Patsy game in week 3 was a disadvantage for us. We the Saints offense scored 10 points of us. We can win this game!

0

#6 User is offline   gmany3k Icon

  • Old Timer
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,302
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:AUSTIN,TX MALE member 2000-01

  • NFL Team:

Posted 19 January 2010 - 01:01 AM

well said shane . sure we will do exactly as we have done in the past 4 games except we must get Peyton off his perch.
the chargers was a joke . we had control of the game with the exception that the refs provided with some weird calls all with some obvious attempts to cheat . like the catch that was ruled an incomplete because the defender got there to fast. if a computer was to search all receptions in the yr of the same BS how many receptions would have been over turned ? I was not convinced of the VJ reception and his right foot touching the turf .I wanted it to be good but the evidence was not good enough for me I hate cheating.
21ST CENTURY NEW YORK STATE OF MIND ."REST IN PEACE NIGHT OWL TOM"Use Caution when reading my comments>.Posted Image
0

#7 User is offline   santana Icon

  • I'm batman
  • Icon
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 7,928
  • Joined: 03-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington DC
  • Interests:Keeping this place from breaking... and titties.

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 19 January 2010 - 02:09 AM

wordd very interesting discussion

i was begging for it to rain out in san diego

i really feel the jets get a clear advantage when some elements are involved
stupid domes...
Nyjetsfan.com Jets Fan Forum and Chat
0

#8 User is offline   NCtexasjets Icon

  • Free Agent
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 47
  • Joined: 21-September 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Home of Crazy Water- Texas

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 19 January 2010 - 09:56 AM

[quote name='gmany3k' date='18 January 2010 - 11:35 PM' timestamp='1263879303' post='293258']
The breaks the other teams defenses will get leave our style of football at a disadvantage.
please elaborate .

If you are saying that the NFL wants to get all games won inside the 2 minutes and high scoring than yes you are correct.
[/quote]


My thought is our O-line seems to get a advantage as the game wears on. I realize the SB still plays with a 60 min game clock, but it also has more stoppages of plays and a much longer half time. In theory that extra time should offer much more rest for our opponents. It obviously gives us more rest too. But i think it gives a advantage to the D-line's. Our offensive strength is running the ball. If we can't run the ball like we have all year i fear the worst.

Then again there is the Sanchez factor... If he plays like he did on opening day in Houston were there was not a third down that was too long for him to convert. Sanchez's third-down passing was unconscious: 12-for-15 for 191 yards, the Stuckey TD and no interceptions, picking up nine first downs in all four to Jerricho Cotchery, three to Stuckey and two to Keller. It wont matter if we run or not. But i like our ground game and i would hate to have that pressure on Mark to win this game.

I love our chances in the AFC title game and the SB no matter who the opponent. I'm just saying the format of the SB favors the passing game and high scoring. But there are a few recent exceptions.

BTW anyone know the last team to get to the SB as the #1 rushing team and also have the #1 D. The '86 Bears maybe? i cant find that stat...
0

#9 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,489
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 19 January 2010 - 12:59 PM

We are in the mold of the 2000 Ravens. They played a SB of a similar format. There is ample time for rest, but the way our guys hit, those stingers don't go away in the time it takes for the The Who to sing their 3 songs.
0

#10 User is offline   SokeSleezy Icon

  • Pro Bowl
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 363
  • Joined: 22-September 08

  • NFL Team:

Posted 19 January 2010 - 01:13 PM

the way i see it,if we make it to the big game,theirs no way we losin that shit,i just cant see it happenin....
0

#11 User is offline   A1elbow Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,890
  • Joined: 07-October 09

  • NFL Team:

Posted 19 January 2010 - 02:23 PM

I'd like to see us against the Saints again. First time we played pretty well, but they just got out on top because of a couple mistakes and at that point in the season we haddn't really hunkered down and started just pounding it like we have.
Posted Image


Exterminate all rational thought, that is the conclusion I have come to
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users