NYJetsFan.com Forums: Randy Moss Aint Happy - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

Lee lee lee lee lee lee lee Lee la la lee le lee leeeee
ganggreen2003 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:27 PM) A LB from Ohio State
azjetfan Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:27 PM) Defiantly not an inspiring pick
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:28 PM) GHOLSTON 2.0
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:28 PM) Guy has had 12 sacks in 2 years?? how the hell is that a 1st round pass rusher
ganggreen2003 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:29 PM) At least we didn't go QB again
ganggreen2003 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:30 PM) You mean GHOSTon
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:31 PM) Not f***ing happy
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:31 PM) I hope I'm wrong tho
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:31 PM) if I'm wrong I will eat m crow
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:39 PM) Some mocks had him top 10
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:42 PM) this guy is small
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:45 PM) Most mocks had Lee at 17 to the Falcons
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:45 PM) He's a day 1 starter for us. We've needed OLB forever
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:46 PM) Plus we generate a great rush from wilk rich and Williams
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:50 PM) I wanted Lawson bad
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:50 PM) f***ing bills
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:51 PM) Lee fills a need better
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:52 PM) I would have liked tunsil to slide to us though. After east picking great
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:52 PM) Would you take Lee over Lawson?
azjetfan Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:55 PM) I'm not inspire by that pick. Not even a little
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 10:01 PM) Wasn't an option. Lawson was gone
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 10:02 PM) Lawson is more of a de. We already have too many of those. We only have 1 proven LBer and he's 32 and we run a 3-4. Lee is a day 1 starter
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 10:03 PM) Broncos traded up for lynch
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 10:41 PM) Round 1 is done
2JBallar01 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 12:43 AM) He will play ILB for us.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 11:08 AM) http://nyjetsfan.com...showtopic=38865
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 11:19 AM) jets tried to trade up for tunsil but the price was too high
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 05:10 PM) Tunsil will end up out of the league
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 05:12 PM) Lee isn't a pass rusher, hes a fast athletic LB. Hes probably their future at ILB, someone who can cover in the middle
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 06:16 PM) jets said he's an ILB for us
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 06:17 PM) If we could grab jack he would be an OLB
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 06:17 PM) ttians have 3 picks in the next 13 picks
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 06:33 PM) jack to jax 36th overal
ganggreen2003 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 06:33 PM) Did you hear that the 1st round pick for the Browns RETIRED after getting drafted
SoReALSoJetS Icon : (29 April 2016 - 07:29 PM) Hi guys long time no talk hope everyone is well
Mr_Jet Icon : (29 April 2016 - 07:46 PM) SMH
ganggreen2003 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 07:46 PM) JETS drafted QB Hackenberg PSU
Mr_Jet Icon : (29 April 2016 - 07:47 PM) Should have picked Connor Cook.
MikeGangGree... Icon : (29 April 2016 - 07:56 PM) I guess we are giving up on petty
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 09:02 PM) Or giving up on geno
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 09:02 PM) I said the rumor was they liked him more then cook
Mr_Jet Icon : (29 April 2016 - 11:35 PM) I know I'm biased, but I've seen them both play. Cook is just better. Hackenberg had one good year. Cook has won more games, played in big games and won them....whatever, its done now so no sense on dwelling on it I guess. I just don't see the appeal in Hackenberg, nice kid, but I always thought he was really overrated. Oh well. I would have taken Kevin Hogan over Hackenberg.
azjetfan Icon : (30 April 2016 - 03:47 PM) From what I have read so far he had a great freshman year under Obrien in a pro style offense. At that point some considered him the next Andrew luck. Then Obrien left and they shifted to a spread under new HC who did poor job bringing in talent. He was also sacked and hit a million times. Might be shell shocked.
Smedsthejet Icon : (Yesterday, 06:17 AM) But Chan Gailey runs a spread system - still, I'm comfortable with the Hackenberg pick seeing as Gailey will develop the system to suit his strength... I'm just glad that we passed on Paxton Lynch in the first...we still desperately need Fitz to re-sign though
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 07:14 PM) From my understanding the spread in college and the spread in NFL are not the same principals. I really think it was more of a talent issue and getting sacked 80 times in 2 years that did him in. I have no idea if he will make it. I don't follow college ball enough to to know. Theses are just things I read in articles.
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Randy Moss Aint Happy

#1 User is offline   S-Dubb Icon

  • 2008 Best Insider Award
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 31,145
  • Joined: 02-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:---
  • Interests:Hardcore Jets & Knicks fan - Gym rat - health and nutrition - family man and proud father.

    Twitter: @NYJETSFANCOM

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 07:29 AM

[img]http://www.rotoworld.com/images/left_corner_player_news.gif[/img] [img]http://www.rotoworld.com/images/teamlogos/NFL_sm/NE.gif[/img] [url="http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=1655"]Randy Moss[/url]-WR- [url="http://www.rotoworld.com/content/clubhouse_news.aspx?sport=NFL&majteam=NE"]Patriots[/url] Sep. 6 - 7:19 pm et [img]http://www.rotoworld.com/images/right_corner_player_news.gif[/img] [img]http://www.rotoworld.com/images/pixel.gif[/img] [img]http://www.rotoworld.com/images/pixel.gif[/img] [img]http://www.rotoworld.com/images/pixel.gif[/img] [img]http://www.rotoworld.com/images/pixel.gif[/img]
Randy Moss expressed frustration Monday that the Patriots have failed to extend his contract.
"When you have done so much and put so much work in, it kind of feels like I am not wanted," he said. "I am taking that in stride and playing my final year out ... but it is kind of a bad feeling -- feeling not wanted. It is not like my production has gone down." Moss admitted that it's "the nature of the business." The 33-year-old will earn $6.4 million this season.[b]Source:[/b] [url="http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/13894020/patriots-moss-feels-not-wanted-without-contract-offer"]CBS Sports [/url]
0

#2 User is offline   CoachasaurusREX Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 890
  • Joined: 03-February 07

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 08:33 AM

Tee hee. And we all thought hte Jets were low balling their players. The Pats just don't even consider it- Mankins being out will hurt them considerably, and Randy Moss is chirping about a contract now? Never good. How can anyone pick them for anything? It's just lazy to not pay attention to how bad things are there.
Evolution:
Ihatehataz->HermIsMyHero->ManginiIsMyFather->CoachasaurusREX

0

#3 User is offline   TheFuture Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,998
  • Joined: 14-November 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:binghamton new york

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 09:17 AM

[quote name='CoachasaurusREX' date='07 September 2010 - 09:33 AM' timestamp='1283866386' post='309150']
Tee hee. And we all thought hte Jets were low balling their players. The Pats just don't even consider it- Mankins being out will hurt them considerably, and Randy Moss is chirping about a contract now? Never good. How can anyone pick them for anything? It's just lazy to not pay attention to how bad things are there.
[/quote]

Mankins will be a bigger loss than an un-happy Moss, he is at the point where he makes one or two big plays a game. As it stands I'd rather have Revis on Welker instead of Moss.
"If you take a swipe at one of ours, we'll take a swipe at two of yours" -Rex Ryan
0

#4 User is offline   Goodfellaz Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 348
  • Joined: 28-September 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NJ

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 09:23 AM

[quote name='TheFuture' date='07 September 2010 - 10:17 AM' timestamp='1283869065' post='309151']
Mankins will be a bigger loss than an un-happy Moss, he is at the point where he makes one or two big plays a game. As it stands I'd rather have Revis on Welker instead of Moss.
[/quote]

Cro's height and athleticism would match up well against Moss. Revis on Welker would be better because you can't really stop Welker from getting some catches over the middle - but Revis is a hell of a tackler.
Posted Image
0

#5 User is offline   gmany3k Icon

  • Old Timer
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,303
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:AUSTIN,TX MALE member 2000-01

  • NFL Team:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 10:32 AM

Wrong we beat the Pats because we made them throw to welker exclusively and all we had to do is tackle him at that point of reception and it worked like a charm.
21ST CENTURY NEW YORK STATE OF MIND ."REST IN PEACE NIGHT OWL TOM"Use Caution when reading my comments>.Posted Image
0

#6 User is offline   TheFuture Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,998
  • Joined: 14-November 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:binghamton new york

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 10:58 AM

[quote name='gmany3k' date='07 September 2010 - 11:32 AM' timestamp='1283873576' post='309168']
Wrong we beat the Pats because we made them throw to welker exclusively and all we had to do is tackle him at that point of reception and it worked like a charm.
[/quote]

Yea except the second time Welker put up 150+ yrds receiving. Even though he had no TD's he was making our D look silly. Yes Sanchez had 4 picks but only 1 was returned for a score.
"If you take a swipe at one of ours, we'll take a swipe at two of yours" -Rex Ryan
0

#7 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,838
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 11:09 AM

[quote name='TheFuture' date='07 September 2010 - 08:58 AM' timestamp='1283875105' post='309172']
Yea except the second time Welker put up 150+ yrds receiving. Even though he had no TD's he was making our D look silly. Yes Sanchez had 4 picks but only 1 was returned for a score.
[/quote]

he destroyed lito and lowery. now with cromartie and wilson we shold be better off. and cro cna play him tight and sue his size cause he knows welker can't burn him
0

#8 User is offline   CoachasaurusREX Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 890
  • Joined: 03-February 07

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 11:41 AM

[quote name='Jetsfan115' date='07 September 2010 - 11:09 AM' timestamp='1283875774' post='309174']
he destroyed lito and lowery. now with cromartie and wilson we shold be better off. and cro cna play him tight and sue his size cause he knows welker can't burn him
[/quote]

Good point about Cro's speed. He might not be as good a tackler as Revis, but he is definitely faster. If Cro can keep Welker close and keep Welker from easy catches, and thus more defenders to take him down, then he might be effectively neutralized. We already know what Revis can do against Moss, keep it that way.
Evolution:
Ihatehataz->HermIsMyHero->ManginiIsMyFather->CoachasaurusREX

0

#9 User is offline   A1elbow Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,892
  • Joined: 07-October 09

  • NFL Team:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 11:52 AM

I'd rather see Revis start off on Welker since he is better at jamming receivers at the line and Welker is near impossible recover after a release. On the other hand, Moss usually struggles with physical corners, so I gues I'd like to see Revis on both of them.

I'm glad Revis is back.
Posted Image


Exterminate all rational thought, that is the conclusion I have come to
0

#10 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,838
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 12:14 PM

[quote name='A1elbow' date='07 September 2010 - 09:52 AM' timestamp='1283878347' post='309178']
I'd rather see Revis start off on Welker since he is better at jamming receivers at the line and Welker is near impossible recover after a release. On the other hand, Moss usually struggles with physical corners, so I gues I'd like to see Revis on both of them.

I'm glad Revis is back.
[/quote]

We need to find a way to clone revis
0

#11 User is offline   ken Icon

  • Free Agent
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 13
  • Joined: 29-August 10

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 01:13 PM

[quote name='Goodfellaz' date='07 September 2010 - 09:23 AM' timestamp='1283869435' post='309154']
Cro's height and athleticism would match up well against Moss. Revis on Welker would be better because you can't really stop Welker from getting some catches over the middle - but Revis is a hell of a tackler.
[/quote]


to be honest man, i think welker is probably the ONLY reciever out there that i am afraid of even if revis was on him, he is small, extremely quick and most of all a SLOT. i know he took out steve smith but that's outside not slot, i prefer wilson to be on him.. that is a much better match
0

#12 User is offline   matt x Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,137
  • Joined: 22-July 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:upstate ny (work in L.I, NJ,&CT.
  • Interests:family, jets, mets, grateful dead.

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 04:32 PM

This is THE year we finally smack the pats around!!! :banana019:
Posted Image
0

#13 User is offline   Smedsthejet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 8,292
  • Joined: 10-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 04:35 PM

[quote name='Jetsfan115' date='07 September 2010 - 05:09 PM' timestamp='1283875774' post='309174']
he destroyed lito and lowery. now with cromartie and wilson we shold be better off. and cro cna play him tight and sue his size cause he knows welker can't burn him
[/quote]

I'd rather have Revis covering Welker and Cromartie on Moss. Cro doesn't have that same discipline as Revis does to stay with a guy, whereas with his height, speed and athleticism - in my opinion at least - he is better spent locking down Moss, who isn't really used on option or underneath routes that much.
0

#14 User is offline   ROBJETS Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,522
  • Joined: 29-September 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 05:24 PM

[quote name='TheFuture' date='07 September 2010 - 11:58 AM' timestamp='1283875105' post='309172']
Yea except the second time Welker put up 150+ yrds receiving. Even though he had no TD's he was making our D look silly. Yes Sanchez had 4 picks but only 1 was returned for a score.
[/quote]
I think we are good with the coverage this year....Lets just hope Sanchez doesnt throw two picks in a game let alone four.
0

#15 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,838
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 05:38 PM

[quote name='ROBJETS' date='07 September 2010 - 03:24 PM' timestamp='1283898243' post='309209']
I think we are good with the coverage this year....Lets just hope Sanchez doesnt throw two picks in a game let alone four.
[/quote]

Sanchez doens't need gaudy numbers. if he can cut down to like 10 INTs we can be great. even if he throws for less then 3000 yards and only 10 TDs. I'm not worry about yards or TDs. i'm worried about % and INTs. if he can be around 60% and throw 10 INTs we'll be good. he's got to use his check down in LT and keller alot more often though
0

#16 User is offline   gmany3k Icon

  • Old Timer
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,303
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:AUSTIN,TX MALE member 2000-01

  • NFL Team:

Posted 07 September 2010 - 06:01 PM

[quote name='TheFuture' date='07 September 2010 - 10:58 AM' timestamp='1283875105' post='309172']
Yea except the second time Welker put up 150+ yrds receiving. Even though he had no TD's he was making our D look silly. Yes Sanchez had 4 picks but only 1 was returned for a score.
[/quote]

Zero points wins games while yds between the 20's does not loose games.
21ST CENTURY NEW YORK STATE OF MIND ."REST IN PEACE NIGHT OWL TOM"Use Caution when reading my comments>.Posted Image
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users