NYJetsFan.com Forums: Calvin Johnson - Catch Rule - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

Chris Johnson signs 2 year deal - http://nyjetsfan.com...showtopic=38339
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 11:34 AM) He was at the Knicks/Nets game yesterday
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 11:36 AM) Idk about the numbers, I read an article that said that the Jets offered a "attractive" deal to Johnson and that it was always a longshot that he would sign yesterday, but the Jets believe the deal is market value for him
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 11:36 AM)

Quote

The Jets put together a convincing package on Tuesday to him, on and off the field. Now it is up to him. - See more at: http://m.metro.us/ne...h.cFze6cx8.dpuf
Chaos Icon : (Today, 12:30 PM) when did we start using "quote" in the shoutbox?
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 12:33 PM) yesterday at 9:24 PM
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 01:09 PM) If the JETS get Chris Johnson he better not wear #28
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 01:09 PM) all I'm sayin
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 01:09 PM) carry on numbnuts
santana Icon : (Today, 01:11 PM)

Quote

nyjetsfan setting new quote trends
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:17 PM) Signed to a two year deal
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:18 PM) Per Shefter
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:18 PM) CJ1K that is
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:20 PM) http://i.imgur.com/RWFWUYi.gif From Santana
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:32 PM) he better not wear 28 though
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:32 PM) all I'm sayin
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:32 PM) that is C-Mart's #
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:32 PM) PERIOD
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 02:33 PM) Hes wearing #28
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 02:34 PM) He ain't wearing 28
Mr_Jet Icon : (Today, 02:34 PM) Well considering they already retired #28 in honor of Curtis Martin, I don't see Johnson wearing #28.
Mr_Jet Icon : (Today, 02:35 PM) Kind of defeats the purpose of retiring a number.
Mr_Jet Icon : (Today, 02:39 PM) But I know he better not wear LaMont Jordan's number. Or I'll be pissed.
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 02:40 PM) Snell
santana Icon : (Today, 02:41 PM) The title race is real
Chaos Icon : (Today, 02:42 PM) Jordan...what number was he? it was 30sometihng
Chaos Icon : (Today, 02:43 PM) tanaka had a great game today. gave up 2 hits due to bunts. 10K
Mr_Jet Icon : (Today, 02:48 PM) Jordan was #34 with the Jets.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 03:03 PM) Tanaka is looking like a stud
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 03:04 PM) Jets added Vick, Chris Johnson, and Eric Decker to the offense.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 03:04 PM) FIRE IDZIK
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 03:04 PM) And this draft is loaded at the offensive skill positions
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 03:04 PM) Hopefully we can get anohter starting WR and starting TE in the draft
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 03:05 PM) Our offense could be much better than last year
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 03:05 PM) can't get much worse than what it's been the last 2 years
santana Icon : (Today, 03:22 PM) Very cool
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Today, 03:24 PM) FIRE IDZIK
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 03:32 PM) still need another WR
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 03:33 PM) so i bet powell barely gets any touches this year and goodson gets cut
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 03:34 PM) Goodson is as good as gone.
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 03:34 PM) With all his legal issues and coming off injury he is done. Possibly even in the NFL
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 03:39 PM) Powell is average anyways.
Chaos Icon : (Today, 03:39 PM) @ProFootballTalk 5m

Per source, Chris Johnson's two-year deal has a base value of $8 million, with another $1 million available in incentives based on yardage.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 03:40 PM) He does a lot of things well, but isn't talented enough. Johnson has breakaway ability still and Ivory is man beast running the football
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 03:41 PM) We will get another WR in the draft. Even in round 2 you can get a starting WR
azjetfan Icon : (Today, 04:09 PM) I am still standing by my CB in the first round and WR in the second prediction
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1

Calvin Johnson - Catch Rule One of the worst rules ever.

#1 User is offline   Goodfellaz Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 348
  • Joined: 28-September 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NJ

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 13 September 2010 - 01:15 PM

Anyone else feel that the rule regarding catches is HORRENDOUS? CJ made the catch and got bumped by the DB. He got both feet down. He fell backwards and his knee was down. Then his ass was down. Then he rolls over and puts the ball on the carpet and it's ruled incomplete. This is unreal considering a RB can poke the ball over the plane for a micron of a second and then fumble and its still a TD. Lions were all but guaranteed to win considering they didn't even need the extra point to have the lead. This is the Tuck Rule Part II.




Posted Image
0

#2 User is offline   cat50 Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 273
  • Joined: 25-October 08

  • NFL Team:

Posted 13 September 2010 - 03:14 PM

View PostGoodfellaz, on 13 September 2010 - 02:15 PM, said:

Anyone else feel that the rule regarding catches is HORRENDOUS? CJ made the catch and got bumped by the DB. He got both feet down. He fell backwards and his knee was down. Then his ass was down. Then he rolls over and puts the ball on the carpet and it's ruled incomplete. This is unreal considering a RB can poke the ball over the plane for a micron of a second and then fumble and its still a TD. Lions were all but guaranteed to win considering they didn't even need the extra point to have the lead. This is the Tuck Rule Part II.






it is horrendous...he clearly has that under control...horrible rule
0

#3 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,538
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 13 September 2010 - 03:23 PM

teh rule was amde a long time ago ebfore HD and all the angles os it made sense back then, however the wording doesn't leave much to the officials to make a judgement call and nowadays with all the cameras and the quality of them the officials should have some sort of judgement to make. and anyone who watches that would say he had possession
Get it done MT
Posted Image
0

#4 User is offline   S-Dubb Icon

  • 2008 Best Insider Award
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 31,128
  • Joined: 02-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:---
  • Interests:Hardcore Jets & Knicks fan - Gym rat - health and nutrition - family man and proud father.

    Twitter: @NYJETSFANCOM

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 13 September 2010 - 03:36 PM

The refs got the rule right but the rule is broken no question about it. The Lions got f*ckin hosed!

0

#5 User is offline   nejets2820 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 841
  • Joined: 16-March 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toms River,NJ

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 13 September 2010 - 03:51 PM

first of all this is almost as bad as the fuckin tuck rule. I mean that was easily a TD and was robbed. Wat makes it worse its that after probably one of the most hard fought games I've ever seen the Lions play. To have it all taken away because of that? unfuckinreal. that's a fuckin joke.


Posted Image
0

#6 User is offline   Smedsthejet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 8,247
  • Joined: 10-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 13 September 2010 - 04:52 PM

They certainly got shafted in my eyes. I remember a couple years back the Giants were playing the Seahawks and Jeremy Shockey caught a pass in the endzone. After getting both his feet down he was immediately hit and the ball came loose, but the score still stood. In this situation, Johnson had both feet down as well as an arm and he fell on his rear with the ball under control before placing the ball on the floor. It was certainly more of a TD than the Shockey situation I remember.
0

#7 User is offline   A1elbow Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,890
  • Joined: 07-October 09

  • NFL Team:

Posted 13 September 2010 - 07:59 PM

No, the worst NFL rule is that a guy laying on the ground getting ax kicked by the kicker can get called for a roughing the kicker penalty. If I was a kicker I'd start hoping around the field after every kick since that dumbass ref apparently thinks you have to have an exaggerated-literal interpretation of the rules.
Posted Image


Exterminate all rational thought, that is the conclusion I have come to
0

#8 User is online   santana Icon

  • I'm batman
  • Icon
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 7,725
  • Joined: 03-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington DC
  • Interests:Keeping this place from breaking... and titties.

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 13 September 2010 - 10:10 PM

View PostA1elbow, on 13 September 2010 - 08:59 PM, said:

No, the worst NFL rule is that a guy laying on the ground getting ax kicked by the kicker can get called for a roughing the kicker penalty. If I was a kicker I'd start hoping around the field after every kick since that dumbass ref apparently thinks you have to have an exaggerated-literal interpretation of the rules.


Kickers hoping around looking to axe kick someone
And qbs constantly pump faking

Ha
Posted Image
Damn it huevos rancheros move out the way!
0

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users