NYJetsFan.com Forums: Thoughts - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

Azjetfan is the nyjetsfan #1 pick
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:21 PM) 6'4 330 DL who is very strong
V DidDy 210 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:25 PM) zac stacy for a 7th
V DidDy 210 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:25 PM) well can't complain about that
MikeGangGree... Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:29 PM) So we have 4 rbs now
V DidDy 210 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:31 PM) still would have rather taken a runner on collins but i can't complain with depth
V DidDy 210 Icon : (02 May 2015 - 04:32 PM) i mean they can't expect to carry 4 rb though no?
azjetfan Icon : (02 May 2015 - 05:50 PM) Collins would have been a waste. He would not have signed. At least we have something to show for our pick. Worst case scenario is we trade or release one of our backs.
azjetfan Icon : (02 May 2015 - 05:56 PM) I know it's hard to tell without seeing a win loss record yet but this regime seems really on point.
azjetfan Icon : (02 May 2015 - 05:56 PM) For the first time in my life I can say I feel comfortable with the people making the decisions.
azjetfan Icon : (02 May 2015 - 05:57 PM) I was close with Parcells but he seemed like a short term fixer and didn't care about the long term
MikeGangGree... Icon : (02 May 2015 - 06:57 PM) SUCK FOR THE DUCK
MikeGangGree... Icon : (02 May 2015 - 06:57 PM) .......oh wait
santana Icon : (03 May 2015 - 01:13 AM) Well that was a disappointment
Chadforpresi... Icon : (03 May 2015 - 01:24 AM) I like getting Stacy for our 7th rounder, assuming he can handle the fact he won't be a feature back (yikes)
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:31 AM) I like the trade, hes a quality back and adds more depth to our backfield
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:32 AM) Macc has pretty much killed it this offseason
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:32 AM) He has turned this roster around, he has added talent and competition all over.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:33 AM) We still aren't great at QB, but our overall football team is good. We have a realistic shot at making a playoff run
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:33 AM) We may have the best defense in football. We have a great DL and secondary, that is gonna be tough on offenses when you can stop the run, pressure the QB, and blanket the receivers
ganggreen2003 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:23 PM) ok now it's time for this team to take all this talent and do something anything below a 10-6 season will be a disappointment
ganggreen2003 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:24 PM) the only still glaring issue is QB
ganggreen2003 Icon : (03 May 2015 - 09:25 PM) we got the WR problem solved, we got probably one of the best Defenses in the game and we have addressed the OL but QB will still be the glaring issue
Chaos Icon : (04 May 2015 - 09:34 AM) jets cleaning house
azjetfan Icon : (04 May 2015 - 05:57 PM) I'm excited about this year. Could be a good year for the Jets.
ganggreen2003 Icon : (04 May 2015 - 07:32 PM) weird how they cleaned house in the scouting department after such a successful draft and off-season so far
azjetfan Icon : (04 May 2015 - 07:36 PM) I assume they didn't bring much to the table
santana Icon : (04 May 2015 - 08:41 PM) Have to clean the table
santana Icon : (04 May 2015 - 09:08 PM) Fuck the rangers
santana Icon : (04 May 2015 - 09:08 PM) face off dominated holtby gtfo
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (04 May 2015 - 09:18 PM) La'el Collins is meeting with Rex Ryan tonight
MikeGangGree... Icon : (05 May 2015 - 12:31 AM) FIVE FINGER DEATH PUNCH!
Chaos Icon : (05 May 2015 - 05:41 AM) Damn that'd make up for the Bills not having a first rounder
azjetfan Icon : (05 May 2015 - 10:59 AM) They didn't sign him yet. It's just a visit.
santana Icon : (05 May 2015 - 01:49 PM) Uefa time
ROBJETS Icon : (05 May 2015 - 11:56 PM) Not sure if anyone saw this on the MSN home page but might be something worth looking into for the offensive line
ROBJETS Icon : (05 May 2015 - 11:56 PM) http://www.msn.com/e...d=HPDHP#image=4
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 02:35 PM) They are going to fry Brady.
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 02:36 PM) Not only caught cheating but also did not cooperate with investigators.
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 05:04 PM) Messi goat
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Yesterday, 08:11 PM) LETS GO RANGERS
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Yesterday, 08:11 PM) FIRE RAUL
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 09:29 PM) FUCK THE RANGERS
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 09:30 PM) Holtby messi status
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 10:18 PM) Did you say Raul??
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 10:18 PM) Here is some of Rauls greatest hits https://youtu.be/7_o9zDvYt7g
Resize Shouts Area

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2

Thoughts

#1 User is offline   J-E-T-S 4417 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 622
  • Joined: 12-January 07
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 13 September 2010 - 09:44 PM

can we really look at this as a disappointment? sure we can. the O was terrible and the D was solid. we held a super bowl contending team to 10 points. this was a game we def should have won if our O showed up to play. All we can do now is just get ready for Sunday. People dont freak we'll be fine. One game wont kill the season.
0

#2 User is offline   NCtexasjets Icon

  • Free Agent
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 47
  • Joined: 21-September 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Home of Crazy Water- Texas

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 13 September 2010 - 11:17 PM

get used to this type of game. they are gonna be like this week in and week out. only we will be on the good end more times then not. We should have won this game 9-6 and i'll take that any day of the week!
0

#3 User is offline   ROBJETS Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,468
  • Joined: 29-September 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 02:02 AM

Well if we cant score a single td on offense I cant see this team coming out on top more often than not. If it goes this way each week all a team has to do is get a td and we lose
0

#4 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,489
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 02:33 AM

Our offense looked as bad as it did all of August. Those who said "Relax, it's just preseason" were wrong, this is our offense... and it's horrible.
0

#5 User is offline   reg83ny Icon

  • TMZ Correspondent
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 4,581
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beantown...I missed NY

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:51 AM

WE got robbed. The only way the ravens could move the ball was thru B.S penalties. The offense didn't help with Greene fumbling twice and Keller who had brain freeze and forgot where the marker was. The offense needs to get it together next week. The refs did a horrible job last night
0

#6 User is offline   C l u t c H 385 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 712
  • Joined: 21-February 07

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 07:09 AM

LOL. If the Jets hadn't committed the penalties they wouldn't have been called. You're grasping at straws.
Posted Image
0

#7 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,489
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 07:55 AM

View PostC l u t c H 385, on 14 September 2010 - 08:09 AM, said:

LOL. If the Jets hadn't committed the penalties they wouldn't have been called. You're grasping at straws.


The K steps on Edwards and he gets flagged? That's just as dumb as the Calvin Johnson no-catch rule. Score should've been 9-6.
0

#8 User is offline   NCtexasjets Icon

  • Free Agent
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 47
  • Joined: 21-September 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Home of Crazy Water- Texas

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 12:22 PM

View PostROBJETS, on 14 September 2010 - 02:02 AM, said:

Well if we cant score a single td on offense I cant see this team coming out on top more often than not. If it goes this way each week all a team has to do is get a td and we lose


I'm pretty sure we will score a offensive TD at some point during the season. (although after last night's performance it doesn't look likely) My point being, most of our games will be low scoring. That will give us a shot at some point late in the game to either go head or hold our opponent when we have a lead.

The Defense will carry this team no doubt, but this is nothing new. Last year very few games were won by the offense and even more were LOST by the offense.

The O needs to stop with all the BS line of scrimmage tomfoolery. They ain't fooling anyone with the multiple formations, shifts and hard counts. Get to the line, snap the fu#*en' ball, control the line of scrimmage, believe in the run and use the pass as the dagger.
And when the D gives you a short field put points on the fu@#en' board!
0

#9 User is offline   C l u t c H 385 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 712
  • Joined: 21-February 07

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 01:21 PM

View PostSecondHandJets, on 14 September 2010 - 08:55 AM, said:

The K steps on Edwards and he gets flagged? That's just as dumb as the Calvin Johnson no-catch rule. Score should've been 9-6.

Its the rule. He committed the penalty, so it should have been called. If it was the other way around you would say the same thing. Control your body and don't end up where the kicker is bringing down his foot if you don't get to the kick.
Posted Image
0

#10 User is offline   A1elbow Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,890
  • Joined: 07-October 09

  • NFL Team:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 01:26 PM

View PostC l u t c H 385, on 14 September 2010 - 01:21 PM, said:

Its the rule. He committed the penalty, so it should have been called. If it was the other way around you would say the same thing. Control your body and don't end up where the kicker is bringing down his foot if you don't get to the kick.


It's not the intention of the rule to penalize a player laying on the ground to be called for it. The rule is to stop players from bumping the kicker while he is vulnerable. By strict interpretation of that rule there is literally nothing to stop the kicker from intentionally moving out of his way to get his leg bumped. As always with the kicker-protecting rules, too strict of an interpretation will cause teams to give up trying to block kicks. Really, any good block attempt will cause contact that could be ruled as a penalty.
Posted Image


Exterminate all rational thought, that is the conclusion I have come to
0

#11 User is offline   cat50 Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 273
  • Joined: 25-October 08

  • NFL Team:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 01:29 PM

a ll the holding calls and the dpi calls were correct....kicker looked like he just fell over. Motion flag cost us 6

Mostly our fault... Cro and Wilson panicked due to being isolated ...if you're gonna blitz 7 you must stop the throw....Rex took the gambles...he failed...outcoached beacuse the Ravens handled the blitz and we didn't adjust.

Our team is schizophrenic...play like wild men on D - AT TIMES TOO RISKY LAST NIGHT. ...play like girls on O failing to even pass 15 yards down the middle
0

#12 User is offline   HurricaneJet32 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,703
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Location:New York

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 04:32 PM

View PostA1elbow, on 14 September 2010 - 02:26 PM, said:

It's not the intention of the rule to penalize a player laying on the ground to be called for it. The rule is to stop players from bumping the kicker while he is vulnerable. By strict interpretation of that rule there is literally nothing to stop the kicker from intentionally moving out of his way to get his leg bumped. As always with the kicker-protecting rules, too strict of an interpretation will cause teams to give up trying to block kicks. Really, any good block attempt will cause contact that could be ruled as a penalty.


Agreed completely...not only that...but if you do actually block the kick you can bend the kicker's leg in half, not a problem.

That's another rule that needs fixing.
Posted Image
0

#13 User is offline   C l u t c H 385 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 712
  • Joined: 21-February 07

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 04:33 PM

View PostA1elbow, on 14 September 2010 - 02:26 PM, said:

It's not the intention of the rule to penalize a player laying on the ground to be called for it. The rule is to stop players from bumping the kicker while he is vulnerable. By strict interpretation of that rule there is literally nothing to stop the kicker from intentionally moving out of his way to get his leg bumped. As always with the kicker-protecting rules, too strict of an interpretation will cause teams to give up trying to block kicks. Really, any good block attempt will cause contact that could be ruled as a penalty.


Part of the running into the kicker rule is not occupying the area on the ground where the kicker is trying to land (if you don't block the kick). Edwards failed to do so. He took a risk and it backfired, can't put it on the refs.
Posted Image
0

#14 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,489
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 04:54 PM

View PostC l u t c H 385, on 14 September 2010 - 05:33 PM, said:

Part of the running into the kicker rule is not occupying the area on the ground where the kicker is trying to land (if you don't block the kick). Edwards failed to do so. He took a risk and it backfired, can't put it on the refs.


That call was bullshit and you know it. If the teams were reversed, you'd be singing a different tune. How is a player who is air born suppose to pick a spot he lands at? Wouldn't that be going against gravity? Rules are designed for two reasons: to ensure fair play and to prevent injuries. If anyone, the K has a choice to either step on the player or not. That should've been an a flag on him for unnecessary roughness and the Ravens should have lost 15 yards.
0

#15 User is offline   C l u t c H 385 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 712
  • Joined: 21-February 07

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:14 PM

View PostSecondHandJets, on 14 September 2010 - 05:54 PM, said:

That call was bullshit and you know it. If the teams were reversed, you'd be singing a different tune. How is a player who is air born suppose to pick a spot he lands at? Wouldn't that be going against gravity? Rules are designed for two reasons: to ensure fair play and to prevent injuries. If anyone, the K has a choice to either step on the player or not. That should've been an a flag on him for unnecessary roughness and the Ravens should have lost 15 yards.


Really? There are dozens of rules in many pro sports that penalize you for not being in control of your body, even while airborne.

This rule fit in one of your purposes. kickers and Punters are given a space to set their leg back down to avoid injury. If you don't block the kick, you can't be in that space.
Posted Image
0

#16 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,489
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:27 PM

View PostC l u t c H 385, on 14 September 2010 - 06:14 PM, said:

Really? There are dozens of rules in many pro sports that penalize you for not being in control of your body, even while airborne.

This rule fit in one of your purposes. kickers and Punters are given a space to set their leg back down to avoid injury. If you don't block the kick, you can't be in that space.


What rules are you talking about? What rule in what sport demands that an airborn player defy the laws of physics?
0

#17 User is offline   C l u t c H 385 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 712
  • Joined: 21-February 07

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:34 PM

View PostSecondHandJets, on 14 September 2010 - 06:27 PM, said:

What rules are you talking about? What rule in what sport demands that an airborn player defy the laws of physics?


*airborne

If a DB leaps in the air and lands on a WR before that WR touches the ball - Pass Interference.
If a a basketball player drives and leaps towards the hoop on a drive for a dunk/lay up and he collides with a defender who had established position - Charging.

Shall I continue?

You choose to leave the ground. Once your up there you have to take the consequences.
Posted Image
0

#18 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,489
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 08:44 PM

View PostC l u t c H 385, on 14 September 2010 - 06:34 PM, said:

*airborne

If a DB leaps in the air and lands on a WR before that WR touches the ball - Pass Interference.
If a a basketball player drives and leaps towards the hoop on a drive for a dunk/lay up and he collides with a defender who had established position - Charging.

Shall I continue?

You choose to leave the ground. Once your up there you have to take the consequences.


Both of those situations are fouls based on the fact that the leaper is initiating contact with a player. Edwards landed on the ground and was stepped on. Quit trying to split hairs.
0

#19 User is offline   Mr_Jet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,314
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

  • NFL Team:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 09:08 PM

View PostC l u t c H 385, on 14 September 2010 - 06:34 PM, said:

*airborne

If a DB leaps in the air and lands on a WR before that WR touches the ball - Pass Interference.
If a a basketball player drives and leaps towards the hoop on a drive for a dunk/lay up and he collides with a defender who had established position - Charging.

Shall I continue?

You choose to leave the ground. Once your up there you have to take the consequences.



It's only charging if your name is not LeBron James.

Oh well when Brandon "Ike Turner" Marshall does the same thing Edwards did you'll be singing a different tune.

View PostFlyHiJets, on 01 June 2013 - 08:35 PM, said:

You're the scumbag that thinks everyone should kiss the as$es of a bunch of criminals but I'm a dumbass. Yeah okay douchebag. Go give some illegal wetback or Revis another blowjob. But then again.....don't you live in an entirely different country but yet think you can tell us how to live? Go fvck yourself little boy. You're likely still living with mommy & daddy. Pu$$y.


View Postazjetfan, on 02 July 2014 - 03:36 PM, said:

There are a few things I have realized about Mr. Jet over a few topics.

1) He is a racist. By constantly using race as a battling tool.
2) He is an extreme Liberal. If you are on either extreme you are probabaly more wrong than right.
3) He is one of those people who will never admit fault, error or defeat.
4)His life sucks and he takes it out on people who don't share in his views.
0

#20 User is offline   C l u t c H 385 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 712
  • Joined: 21-February 07

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 09:14 PM

View PostSecondHandJets, on 14 September 2010 - 09:44 PM, said:

Both of those situations are fouls based on the fact that the leaper is initiating contact with a player. Edwards landed on the ground and was stepped on. Quit trying to split hairs.


By ending up in the area where the kicker is supposed to be able to land, he initiated contact. All the situation involve being out of control. No hairs need to be split.

It would be the right call no matter what team it was against. I wouldn't be happy if it happened to the Dolphins, but it would still be the right call.
Posted Image
0

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users