NYJetsFan.com Forums: Thoughts - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

2014 NYJetsFan Fantasy League sign up: http://nyjetsfan.com...showtopic=38425
azjetfan Icon : (18 August 2014 - 09:36 PM) He wants to build through the draft. Not blow the bank on FA. I get what your saying but there is a balance and right now we are not one or two pieces away.
Mr_Jet Icon : (18 August 2014 - 11:00 PM) It's not about being one or two pieces away. It's about keeping the good pieces you have and building upon that.
Mr_Jet Icon : (18 August 2014 - 11:04 PM) But there is no sense in trying to build through the draft if he's only going to end up letting the good players he picks up go in FA after a few years. All because he wants to do things on the cheap.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (19 August 2014 - 07:02 AM) FIRE IDZIK
azjetfan Icon : (19 August 2014 - 08:33 AM) out side of Revis who left we should have kept?
azjetfan Icon : (19 August 2014 - 08:34 AM) The Revis deal sucks but $16 million was too much for a CB and once he was gone he was not coming back.
Mr_Jet Icon : (19 August 2014 - 11:00 AM) Matt Slauson
azjetfan Icon : (19 August 2014 - 01:00 PM) Eh. I think with our current cap situation we will be able to retain guys like Wilkerson and whomever we want to keep. We are in a good position right now.
Mr_Jet Icon : (19 August 2014 - 01:49 PM) Time will tell.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (19 August 2014 - 02:00 PM) landed revis abck. got DRC, nope we take patterson who got owned and always hurt. milner always hurt. 3rd round CB done for season. were gonna get passed on all day
azjetfan Icon : (19 August 2014 - 02:44 PM) Yea the DRC bit makes me iffy
Jetsfan115 Icon : (19 August 2014 - 03:35 PM) better then patterson
azjetfan Icon : (19 August 2014 - 05:45 PM) No I mean the fact that he whiffed on him.
azjetfan Icon : (19 August 2014 - 05:46 PM) I'm not saying Idzik is perfect. I just like the direction we are heading. It's going to take some patience.
RetireChrebet Icon : (19 August 2014 - 06:27 PM) I like how our lack of secondary is the hot topic right now. The bigger issue is we still will not be able to throw the ball. We are not going to do much of anything regardless until we get a QB. Sorry for being so negative just my honest opinion.
RetireChrebet Icon : (19 August 2014 - 06:29 PM) With that said I think our running game with CJ and Powell will be top 10 or somewhere around there
Jetsfan115 Icon : (19 August 2014 - 06:35 PM) i have faith that if geno messes up that vick can come in and do well. but i have 0 faith in our secondary right now which has been our strong point for the past 4 years or so
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2014 - 07:35 PM) I agree 115. but the one thing is Rex has done some good things in the past with shitty DBs and still had a solid D going back to his years in BAL
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2014 - 07:37 PM) Corey Ivy CB
36 Jim Leonhard SS/PR
43 Haruki Nakamura FS
25 Evan Oglesby CB
20 Ed Reed FS
22 Samari Rolle CB
39 Daren Stone FS
41 Frank Walker CB
31 Fabian Washington in 2008
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2014 - 07:39 PM) Reed is a HOF but Rolle was way past his prime
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2014 - 07:41 PM) SNOOPY BOWL FRIDAY!!!
MikeGangGree... Icon : (19 August 2014 - 07:41 PM) WOOOOOOOOOOOOO
azjetfan Icon : (19 August 2014 - 08:26 PM) I assume we will pick up a guy after the cuts happen.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (19 August 2014 - 10:14 PM) we'll see but I think we see better QB play than we have in a while.
518-JeTS-FaN Icon : (20 August 2014 - 08:54 AM) disgusted with my local programming, instead of jets and giants they are airing the raiders vs packers..wtf
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (20 August 2014 - 09:23 AM) Glad I don't live up there anymore haha
ganggreen2003 Icon : (20 August 2014 - 06:59 PM) The JETS are #6 in the Forbes List for most franchise value
ganggreen2003 Icon : (20 August 2014 - 06:59 PM) The Buffalo Jills are #31 and the Miami Dolphags are #16 respectively
ganggreen2003 Icon : (20 August 2014 - 07:00 PM) The JETS are worth $1.8 billion
jet-man Icon : (20 August 2014 - 10:03 PM) that's less than the clippers
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (21 August 2014 - 01:07 PM) I'm very excited with the amount of preseason touchdowns the Jets have
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (21 August 2014 - 03:21 PM) FIRE IDZIK
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (21 August 2014 - 07:22 PM) Calvin Pryor and Darrin Walls will start tomorrow
ganggreen2003 Icon : (21 August 2014 - 08:52 PM) The SIMPSONS MARATHON has been on for almost 12 hours...
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (21 August 2014 - 08:57 PM) Sanchez looks so much more confident and better in Chip's offense than he did with us
ganggreen2003 Icon : (21 August 2014 - 09:50 PM) EVERY SIMPSONS EVER!!!!!
2JBallar01 Icon : (Yesterday, 07:10 AM) Sanchez is looking good for the eagles. Crazy how a good offense and the right system can make you look so much better. When you're put into a situatuon to succeed, magic happens. Happy for Sanchez, i think he needed a change just as much as the Jets did.
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Yesterday, 08:02 AM) Preseason doesn't matter at all
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 11:10 AM) anyone have a stream for the preseaosn agme by chance?
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 09:06 PM) Don't read to much into Mark in the preseason. He usually looked good in the preseason even in a Jets uniform.. Big difference from regular season where the 1st string defense is playing 100%.
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 09:09 PM) A lot of 1st stringers are just getting reps in and trying not to get injured. Its only the backups trying to keep or get a job playing hard every down. If preseason qb play meant anything then Matt Simms would be the starting qb of the Jets.
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Today, 12:00 AM) In Geno we trust
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 07:23 AM) preseason or not, our offense hasn't looked competent in a while like it does this year. our rushing attack should be very good. Chris Johnson and Chris Ivory could be a dynamic duo
santana Icon : (Today, 10:14 AM) http://youtu.be/2X0H709cJkA
santana Icon : (Today, 01:28 PM) 2-0 lead most dangerous kind of lead
Resize Shouts Area

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2

Thoughts

#1 User is offline   J-E-T-S 4417 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 622
  • Joined: 12-January 07
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 13 September 2010 - 09:44 PM

can we really look at this as a disappointment? sure we can. the O was terrible and the D was solid. we held a super bowl contending team to 10 points. this was a game we def should have won if our O showed up to play. All we can do now is just get ready for Sunday. People dont freak we'll be fine. One game wont kill the season.
0

#2 User is offline   NCtexasjets Icon

  • Free Agent
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 47
  • Joined: 21-September 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Home of Crazy Water- Texas

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 13 September 2010 - 11:17 PM

get used to this type of game. they are gonna be like this week in and week out. only we will be on the good end more times then not. We should have won this game 9-6 and i'll take that any day of the week!
0

#3 User is offline   ROBJETS Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,383
  • Joined: 29-September 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 02:02 AM

Well if we cant score a single td on offense I cant see this team coming out on top more often than not. If it goes this way each week all a team has to do is get a td and we lose
0

#4 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,488
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 02:33 AM

Our offense looked as bad as it did all of August. Those who said "Relax, it's just preseason" were wrong, this is our offense... and it's horrible.
0

#5 User is online   reg83ny Icon

  • TMZ Correspondent
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 4,552
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beantown...I missed NY

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:51 AM

WE got robbed. The only way the ravens could move the ball was thru B.S penalties. The offense didn't help with Greene fumbling twice and Keller who had brain freeze and forgot where the marker was. The offense needs to get it together next week. The refs did a horrible job last night
0

#6 User is offline   C l u t c H 385 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 712
  • Joined: 21-February 07

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 07:09 AM

LOL. If the Jets hadn't committed the penalties they wouldn't have been called. You're grasping at straws.
Posted Image
0

#7 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,488
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 07:55 AM

View PostC l u t c H 385, on 14 September 2010 - 08:09 AM, said:

LOL. If the Jets hadn't committed the penalties they wouldn't have been called. You're grasping at straws.


The K steps on Edwards and he gets flagged? That's just as dumb as the Calvin Johnson no-catch rule. Score should've been 9-6.
0

#8 User is offline   NCtexasjets Icon

  • Free Agent
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 47
  • Joined: 21-September 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Home of Crazy Water- Texas

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 12:22 PM

View PostROBJETS, on 14 September 2010 - 02:02 AM, said:

Well if we cant score a single td on offense I cant see this team coming out on top more often than not. If it goes this way each week all a team has to do is get a td and we lose


I'm pretty sure we will score a offensive TD at some point during the season. (although after last night's performance it doesn't look likely) My point being, most of our games will be low scoring. That will give us a shot at some point late in the game to either go head or hold our opponent when we have a lead.

The Defense will carry this team no doubt, but this is nothing new. Last year very few games were won by the offense and even more were LOST by the offense.

The O needs to stop with all the BS line of scrimmage tomfoolery. They ain't fooling anyone with the multiple formations, shifts and hard counts. Get to the line, snap the fu#*en' ball, control the line of scrimmage, believe in the run and use the pass as the dagger.
And when the D gives you a short field put points on the fu@#en' board!
0

#9 User is offline   C l u t c H 385 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 712
  • Joined: 21-February 07

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 01:21 PM

View PostSecondHandJets, on 14 September 2010 - 08:55 AM, said:

The K steps on Edwards and he gets flagged? That's just as dumb as the Calvin Johnson no-catch rule. Score should've been 9-6.

Its the rule. He committed the penalty, so it should have been called. If it was the other way around you would say the same thing. Control your body and don't end up where the kicker is bringing down his foot if you don't get to the kick.
Posted Image
0

#10 User is offline   A1elbow Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,890
  • Joined: 07-October 09

  • NFL Team:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 01:26 PM

View PostC l u t c H 385, on 14 September 2010 - 01:21 PM, said:

Its the rule. He committed the penalty, so it should have been called. If it was the other way around you would say the same thing. Control your body and don't end up where the kicker is bringing down his foot if you don't get to the kick.


It's not the intention of the rule to penalize a player laying on the ground to be called for it. The rule is to stop players from bumping the kicker while he is vulnerable. By strict interpretation of that rule there is literally nothing to stop the kicker from intentionally moving out of his way to get his leg bumped. As always with the kicker-protecting rules, too strict of an interpretation will cause teams to give up trying to block kicks. Really, any good block attempt will cause contact that could be ruled as a penalty.
Posted Image


Exterminate all rational thought, that is the conclusion I have come to
0

#11 User is offline   cat50 Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 273
  • Joined: 25-October 08

  • NFL Team:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 01:29 PM

a ll the holding calls and the dpi calls were correct....kicker looked like he just fell over. Motion flag cost us 6

Mostly our fault... Cro and Wilson panicked due to being isolated ...if you're gonna blitz 7 you must stop the throw....Rex took the gambles...he failed...outcoached beacuse the Ravens handled the blitz and we didn't adjust.

Our team is schizophrenic...play like wild men on D - AT TIMES TOO RISKY LAST NIGHT. ...play like girls on O failing to even pass 15 yards down the middle
0

#12 User is offline   HurricaneJet32 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,693
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Location:New York

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 04:32 PM

View PostA1elbow, on 14 September 2010 - 02:26 PM, said:

It's not the intention of the rule to penalize a player laying on the ground to be called for it. The rule is to stop players from bumping the kicker while he is vulnerable. By strict interpretation of that rule there is literally nothing to stop the kicker from intentionally moving out of his way to get his leg bumped. As always with the kicker-protecting rules, too strict of an interpretation will cause teams to give up trying to block kicks. Really, any good block attempt will cause contact that could be ruled as a penalty.


Agreed completely...not only that...but if you do actually block the kick you can bend the kicker's leg in half, not a problem.

That's another rule that needs fixing.
Posted Image
0

#13 User is offline   C l u t c H 385 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 712
  • Joined: 21-February 07

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 04:33 PM

View PostA1elbow, on 14 September 2010 - 02:26 PM, said:

It's not the intention of the rule to penalize a player laying on the ground to be called for it. The rule is to stop players from bumping the kicker while he is vulnerable. By strict interpretation of that rule there is literally nothing to stop the kicker from intentionally moving out of his way to get his leg bumped. As always with the kicker-protecting rules, too strict of an interpretation will cause teams to give up trying to block kicks. Really, any good block attempt will cause contact that could be ruled as a penalty.


Part of the running into the kicker rule is not occupying the area on the ground where the kicker is trying to land (if you don't block the kick). Edwards failed to do so. He took a risk and it backfired, can't put it on the refs.
Posted Image
0

#14 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,488
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 04:54 PM

View PostC l u t c H 385, on 14 September 2010 - 05:33 PM, said:

Part of the running into the kicker rule is not occupying the area on the ground where the kicker is trying to land (if you don't block the kick). Edwards failed to do so. He took a risk and it backfired, can't put it on the refs.


That call was bullshit and you know it. If the teams were reversed, you'd be singing a different tune. How is a player who is air born suppose to pick a spot he lands at? Wouldn't that be going against gravity? Rules are designed for two reasons: to ensure fair play and to prevent injuries. If anyone, the K has a choice to either step on the player or not. That should've been an a flag on him for unnecessary roughness and the Ravens should have lost 15 yards.
0

#15 User is offline   C l u t c H 385 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 712
  • Joined: 21-February 07

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:14 PM

View PostSecondHandJets, on 14 September 2010 - 05:54 PM, said:

That call was bullshit and you know it. If the teams were reversed, you'd be singing a different tune. How is a player who is air born suppose to pick a spot he lands at? Wouldn't that be going against gravity? Rules are designed for two reasons: to ensure fair play and to prevent injuries. If anyone, the K has a choice to either step on the player or not. That should've been an a flag on him for unnecessary roughness and the Ravens should have lost 15 yards.


Really? There are dozens of rules in many pro sports that penalize you for not being in control of your body, even while airborne.

This rule fit in one of your purposes. kickers and Punters are given a space to set their leg back down to avoid injury. If you don't block the kick, you can't be in that space.
Posted Image
0

#16 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,488
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:27 PM

View PostC l u t c H 385, on 14 September 2010 - 06:14 PM, said:

Really? There are dozens of rules in many pro sports that penalize you for not being in control of your body, even while airborne.

This rule fit in one of your purposes. kickers and Punters are given a space to set their leg back down to avoid injury. If you don't block the kick, you can't be in that space.


What rules are you talking about? What rule in what sport demands that an airborn player defy the laws of physics?
0

#17 User is offline   C l u t c H 385 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 712
  • Joined: 21-February 07

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:34 PM

View PostSecondHandJets, on 14 September 2010 - 06:27 PM, said:

What rules are you talking about? What rule in what sport demands that an airborn player defy the laws of physics?


*airborne

If a DB leaps in the air and lands on a WR before that WR touches the ball - Pass Interference.
If a a basketball player drives and leaps towards the hoop on a drive for a dunk/lay up and he collides with a defender who had established position - Charging.

Shall I continue?

You choose to leave the ground. Once your up there you have to take the consequences.
Posted Image
0

#18 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,488
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 08:44 PM

View PostC l u t c H 385, on 14 September 2010 - 06:34 PM, said:

*airborne

If a DB leaps in the air and lands on a WR before that WR touches the ball - Pass Interference.
If a a basketball player drives and leaps towards the hoop on a drive for a dunk/lay up and he collides with a defender who had established position - Charging.

Shall I continue?

You choose to leave the ground. Once your up there you have to take the consequences.


Both of those situations are fouls based on the fact that the leaper is initiating contact with a player. Edwards landed on the ground and was stepped on. Quit trying to split hairs.
0

#19 User is offline   Mr_Jet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,232
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

  • NFL Team:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 09:08 PM

View PostC l u t c H 385, on 14 September 2010 - 06:34 PM, said:

*airborne

If a DB leaps in the air and lands on a WR before that WR touches the ball - Pass Interference.
If a a basketball player drives and leaps towards the hoop on a drive for a dunk/lay up and he collides with a defender who had established position - Charging.

Shall I continue?

You choose to leave the ground. Once your up there you have to take the consequences.



It's only charging if your name is not LeBron James.

Oh well when Brandon "Ike Turner" Marshall does the same thing Edwards did you'll be singing a different tune.
New York Jets
Super Bowl III Champions


Los Angeles Lakers
16-times NBA World Champions

1949, 1950, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1972, 1980, 1982, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2009, 2010

View PostFlyHiJets, on 01 June 2013 - 08:35 PM, said:

You're the scumbag that thinks everyone should kiss the as$es of a bunch of criminals but I'm a dumbass. Yeah okay douchebag. Go give some illegal wetback or Revis another blowjob. But then again.....don't you live in an entirely different country but yet think you can tell us how to live? Go fvck yourself little boy. You're likely still living with mommy & daddy. Pu$$y.


View Postazjetfan, on 02 July 2014 - 03:36 PM, said:

There are a few things I have realized about Mr. Jet over a few topics.

1) He is a racist. By constantly using race as a battling tool.
2) He is an extreme Liberal. If you are on either extreme you are probabaly more wrong than right.
3) He is one of those people who will never admit fault, error or defeat.
4)His life sucks and he takes it out on people who don't share in his views.
0

#20 User is offline   C l u t c H 385 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 712
  • Joined: 21-February 07

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 09:14 PM

View PostSecondHandJets, on 14 September 2010 - 09:44 PM, said:

Both of those situations are fouls based on the fact that the leaper is initiating contact with a player. Edwards landed on the ground and was stepped on. Quit trying to split hairs.


By ending up in the area where the kicker is supposed to be able to land, he initiated contact. All the situation involve being out of control. No hairs need to be split.

It would be the right call no matter what team it was against. I wouldn't be happy if it happened to the Dolphins, but it would still be the right call.
Posted Image
0

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users