NYJetsFan.com Forums: The Perception Of The Ravens After Last Night - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

JSOTF Icon : (26 March 2015 - 06:47 AM) hahahaha, it isnt European Football!
ROBJETS Icon : (26 March 2015 - 07:04 AM) Ive seen a lot of videos. Most countries go psycho over their soccer teams. Ive seen some serious very bloody beat downs. Fans stabbing the players and refs,etc. And they say we are bad in the U.S. not even close to that.
ROBJETS Icon : (26 March 2015 - 07:06 AM) I think one was in Africa....a fan stormed the field and was knifing everyone in sight after his team lost
ROBJETS Icon : (26 March 2015 - 07:08 AM) Hell even in mma when the Brits come over they are all cocky as hell. Big time cocky like they are going to easily destroy everyone they face cocky.
JSOTF Icon : (26 March 2015 - 07:36 AM) hahahaha
JSOTF Icon : (26 March 2015 - 07:36 AM) damn Europeans!
JSOTF Icon : (26 March 2015 - 07:37 AM) They havent fucked with a disgruntled, lifelong Jets fan!!!
Smedsthejet Icon : (26 March 2015 - 02:49 PM) Got my tickets from Ticketmaster the day they went on general sale
ROBJETS Icon : (27 March 2015 - 02:33 AM) You guys get Bellator in London? http://www.bellator.com/schedule its on Spike tv free regular cable channel. in the U.S. and the prelims are free on http://www.spike.com/
ROBJETS Icon : (27 March 2015 - 02:37 AM) London is 4 hours ahead of east coast U.S. Bellator prelims are 7pm Friday night U.S. East Coast time and the main card is 9pm So just add 4 hours to that if you can catch either. Im sure you can catch a stream or use a U.S. VPN if you dont have access to Spike.com. You guys might get Bellator on another channel their just like with the UFC.
ROBJETS Icon : (27 March 2015 - 02:47 AM) Anyway only reason I mentioned it was because of your sense of humor. The last Bellator 134 was called the British Invasion. If you watch mma Might want to add this site to your favorites http://www.mmauk.net...y/bellatornews/
ROBJETS Icon : (27 March 2015 - 02:55 AM) There was one of those hour long shows about the upcoming event featuring the fighters the prior week to Bellator 134 and all 4 of the Brits were cocky as hell. Yelling "The British are coming!!!!"
ROBJETS Icon : (27 March 2015 - 02:57 AM) By the way 135 is tonight if you are interested. I used to watch pretty much all the televised mma now I stick with Bellator and UFC only
ROBJETS Icon : (27 March 2015 - 03:07 AM) that last link is a UK mma site. Only reason i added it. http://www.sherdog.com/ is pretty much the best mma site on the net for everything mma
JSOTF Icon : (27 March 2015 - 07:08 AM) I actually live in Germany
azjetfan Icon : (27 March 2015 - 09:08 PM) Just got done sitting in traffic for 3 hours in Louisville KY.
azjetfan Icon : (27 March 2015 - 09:09 PM) Unbelievably poor planning by the DOT.
santana Icon : (28 March 2015 - 05:48 PM) Favre on my TV selling shaving razors so I bought a years supply
azjetfan Icon : (30 March 2015 - 02:12 PM) Soooo has anyone had any experience with the new Sling Tv?
azjetfan Icon : (30 March 2015 - 02:13 PM) $20 a month gets you ESPN and 15 other channels.
azjetfan Icon : (30 March 2015 - 02:18 PM) All streamed.
santana Icon : (30 March 2015 - 02:57 PM) negative
santana Icon : (30 March 2015 - 02:58 PM) I'm a fan of the apple tv though. I just use a clients fios tv account to access the different services like watch espn
santana Icon : (30 March 2015 - 02:59 PM) i also have hbo go netflix amazon prime. with hd antennas i get the local channels as well.
azjetfan Icon : (30 March 2015 - 03:00 PM) I tried the watch ESPN ap but since I cancelled my DTV it said I needed a provider.
santana Icon : (30 March 2015 - 03:10 PM) yep need an account
santana Icon : (30 March 2015 - 03:11 PM) nbc sports app also works really well I airplay that to the appletv
azjetfan Icon : (30 March 2015 - 09:01 PM) Alright signed up for the sling TV bit.
azjetfan Icon : (30 March 2015 - 09:01 PM) Pretty cool so far.
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 12:56 AM) mock drafts have mariota going to the jets and the rest seem to have no clue
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 09:25 AM) I think he will be gone before that
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 09:25 AM) Either someone will trade up or he will be taken by Titans or Redskins
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 12:58 PM) JEts are going to remain at florham park for training camp
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 12:58 PM) no cortland or hofstra
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 06:12 PM) Unless you guys are looking for internet tv alternatives to cable or satellite tv You are better off just buying a slingbox http://www.slingbox.com/
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 06:15 PM) I like Directv better but ine thing Dishnetwork has is an integrated slinbox into the Genie so it is far better receiver than Directv`s
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 06:18 PM) With a slingbox you can just login to Slingbox and you can watch every single channel you have at home with the same guide and remote. A Slingbox basically makes it as if you have a receiver anywhere in the world you have internet access. So you get every single channel that you get at home with all the functions. setting recordings, watch recorded shows,etc.
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 06:27 PM) Its not the same thing as Directv ans cable companies giving you access to certain channels by logging in our going to websites by logging in. You literally get every single channel from home anywhere as long as you have wifi or wired net. My cousin has a Slingbox hooked to his Directv receiver. Actually I mean hopper.....duhhhh Directv has the Genie. The Hopper has the integrated Slingbox...and thats hats the one cool thing about the Hopper not having to shell out the extra cash for a seaparate slingbox since its integrated with the Hopper
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 06:28 PM) Slingboxes are nice just not cheap
Mr_Jet Icon : (Yesterday, 08:50 PM) :thud:
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 09:08 PM) I did away with paying over a hundred bucks a month. My DTV bill was crazy and even after I lowered my package to the minimum I was still paying way too much for something we really didn't use much
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 09:09 PM) i do NetFlix and Sling TV.
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 09:09 PM) i was doing Hulu too but cancelled it
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 09:10 PM) I have $30 a month into my tv now. Locals with an HD antenna
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 11:46 PM) Word Hd antenna is real nice when you live close to a city. Here in nola everything comes in crisp and clear for a $6 antenna
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1

The Perception Of The Ravens After Last Night

#1 User is offline   A1elbow Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,890
  • Joined: 07-October 09

  • NFL Team:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 01:44 PM

Anyone else find it funny that the logic after last night coming out of the media is that:

a)The Jets were exposed and the offense is bad
b)The Ravens dominated the game
c)The Ravens are a great team by beating a team that everyone is slamming

The Ravens are getting blown up everywhere, while the Jets are getting killed (and mostly deservedly so). What I can't figure out is how the Ravens, who barely scored and needed a team committing over a dozen penalties for over a hundred yards to win, are that much a better team. I mean, we are a great defense, but they controlled the ball almost the entire game and still only had an averagely productive game.

I'm sick of the Ravens. They're hyped every season as being one step away and they always finish like that, just shy of the playoffs or falling short of the Super Bowl. They're like a less hyped version of the Chargers.

Also, for the record, the story that sparked me on this is Don Banks' story for SI. http://sportsillustr...ings/index.html

He also says in there that losing Jenkins is a huge loss for us. I guess he didn't notice that we played as well without him as we did in that game and went to the AFC championship without him last season.
Posted Image


Exterminate all rational thought, that is the conclusion I have come to
0

#2 User is offline   Jetsfan0099 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 17,110
  • Joined: 30-July 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Jersey

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 02:05 PM

I thought the Jets looked way better on defense, they were out there for most of the game and were dominating the Ravens, the penalties hurt and bailed the Ravens out. Hopefully this was just one of those games, I know the refs were known for calling a lot of penalties last year. Rex said it perfectly, there are aggressive penalties and there are stupid penalties, you got to eliminate the stupid ones.


I thought the Braylon Edwards "running into the kicker" penalty was absolute BULLSHIT. Edwards almost had the block, he was diving for it, he didn't run into the kicker, the kicker as soon as his kicking leg was coming down and touched Edwards dropped down, it was so phony and complete bullshit. That rule is so dumb, I can see actually running into the kicker which is dangerous, but what Edwards did really? That is just not allowing them to play football and just dictating the game by penalties.. That penalty was huge since we lost 10-9, would of been a 9-6 win. Kickers are so f***ing annoying, biggest pansies on the field.
Posted Image
0

#3 User is offline   gmany3k Icon

  • Old Timer
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,301
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:AUSTIN,TX MALE member 2000-01

  • NFL Team:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 04:35 PM

you guys covered just about everything.
21ST CENTURY NEW YORK STATE OF MIND ."REST IN PEACE NIGHT OWL TOM"Use Caution when reading my comments>.Posted Image
0

#4 User is offline   ROBJETS Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,466
  • Joined: 29-September 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 04:52 PM

The Ravens are what I thought they were. They had the 3rd best defense last year and it showed. Jets nuumber one defense was better.
Penalties killed us but Ravens have a great qb under center Jets didnt.So their offense is better
0

#5 User is offline   C l u t c H 385 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 712
  • Joined: 21-February 07

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:22 PM

The Ravens also have 3 solid vet WRs that knew what to do against single coverage. There's not many other WR corps in the league like that.

As a Dolphins fan, of course its great to get a laugh at the Jets. But more than anything its just because of all the talking they did. If they had kept quiet and played the same way, they wouldn't be getting killed as bad as they are now.

Of course its any given Sunday, but I don't like the chances of the Dolphins playing the Ravens so tight.
Posted Image
0

#6 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,489
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:23 PM

What did the Ravens do well last night? Our offensive gameplan was non existant, but LT still managed something like 5 YPC. We targeted our WR a whopping 3 times the entire night! The one turnover the Ravens got, was when Greene ran into Slaughson and fumbled. On the other side of the ball, the Ravens needed the refs to move the ball. If it wasn't for the penalties, we'd have given up 6 points... at most.
0

#7 User is offline   C l u t c H 385 Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 712
  • Joined: 21-February 07

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:26 PM

View PostSecondHandJets, on 14 September 2010 - 06:23 PM, said:

What did the Ravens do well last night?

They did a decent job of picking up the blitz, making a decent throw and giving the Jets DBs the choice of PI or completed passes.


Quote

Ravens needed the refs to move the ball. If it wasn't for the penalties, we'd have given up 6 points... at most.


No, the Ravens needed your guys in single coverage because of the blitzes to commit PI to move the ball, or make nice throws and catches against that single coverage to move the ball.
Posted Image
0

#8 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,489
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 14 September 2010 - 05:31 PM

View PostC l u t c H 385, on 14 September 2010 - 06:26 PM, said:

They did a decent job of picking up the blitz, making a decent throw and giving the Jets DBs the choice of PI or completed passes.

No, the Ravens needed your guys in single coverage because of the blitzes to commit PI to move the ball, or make nice throws and catches against that single coverage to move the ball.


I agree. The one area where they didn't completely suck was not giving up a lot of sacks. Point taken, considering we didn't have our best pass rusher and our defense was on the field for 3/4 of the game, I doubt that the Ravens should take turns giving each other Gatorade sponge baths. As far as those PI calls, a couple were legit but there were a few that could've gone either way. That PI call on Wilson to move the ball to the 1 was complete BS. Even Gruden thought so.
0

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users