Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Would You Want Peyton Manning?
#1
Posted 24 January 2012 - 04:13 PM
Thoughts?
Seems is if Peyton and Colts are going part ways. If he plays do you want him?
Seems is if Peyton and Colts are going part ways. If he plays do you want him?
#2
Posted 24 January 2012 - 04:22 PM
If hes healthy, HELL YES. Hes an elite QB and would make everyone better, it would put us in great position to get to a SB within the next few seasons. Rex Ryan with Peyton Manning would be insane. Hes really the only QB I would want to start over Sanchez next year.
The NFL would love seeing Brady vs Manning 2 times a year, would make the Jets/Patriots rivalry huge.
The NFL would love seeing Brady vs Manning 2 times a year, would make the Jets/Patriots rivalry huge.
#5
Posted 24 January 2012 - 04:30 PM
I gotta go with 05 here. As critical as I've been on Sanchez he still should be the starter.
- we invested to much in him already
- we've been to 2 AFC champ games with him
- the downside to not winning with Peyton would round house kick this franchise
- The neck injury is big deal even if he's cleared to play
- in 2-3 years were back a square 1 all over again
- We wouldn't keep Sanchez if we get Peyton
Just a few reasons.
- we invested to much in him already
- we've been to 2 AFC champ games with him
- the downside to not winning with Peyton would round house kick this franchise
- The neck injury is big deal even if he's cleared to play
- in 2-3 years were back a square 1 all over again
- We wouldn't keep Sanchez if we get Peyton
Just a few reasons.
#6
#7
Posted 24 January 2012 - 04:32 PM
Few would turn down a healthy Peyton Manning playing at his previous level.
But it all depends on a.) his health and b.) the cost. We don't know how durable he's going to be after so long out, and he's bound to come at a huge cost as 05 already said. Also, paying what the Colts will no doubt want for him and taking on his contract would be a massive gamble given his injury status. So I don't think there's much chance of it happening.
But it all depends on a.) his health and b.) the cost. We don't know how durable he's going to be after so long out, and he's bound to come at a huge cost as 05 already said. Also, paying what the Colts will no doubt want for him and taking on his contract would be a massive gamble given his injury status. So I don't think there's much chance of it happening.
#8
Posted 24 January 2012 - 04:49 PM
If hes healthy then you take him every single day.
Lunatics, would stick by sanchez with manning available. Yeah yeah yeah theres some honor in producing your own qb that leads you to the promise land. yeah i get the team is not well rounded and has more weaknesses then just at qb.
but simply qb is not the jets strength. with manning it would become a strength and give the team an identity. strike any time offense.
by this point its been so long the jets have been in a SB that you just have to say screw honor. every team builds through free agency in some way. if manning is released and comes out saying hes healthy and motivated to play for the jets.. you take him every day.
Lunatics, would stick by sanchez with manning available. Yeah yeah yeah theres some honor in producing your own qb that leads you to the promise land. yeah i get the team is not well rounded and has more weaknesses then just at qb.
but simply qb is not the jets strength. with manning it would become a strength and give the team an identity. strike any time offense.
by this point its been so long the jets have been in a SB that you just have to say screw honor. every team builds through free agency in some way. if manning is released and comes out saying hes healthy and motivated to play for the jets.. you take him every day.

woo woooo
#12
Posted 24 January 2012 - 07:12 PM
If he is 100%.
If the cost did not mean we had to release the core players of this team.
If he would play here.
If we can protect him
Then yes. There is a whole lot of if in there. We would be foolish not to. If he is the difference for the Colts to be 11-5 one year and 3-13 the next, what would he do to an 8-8 team? He would be a 14 point a game advantage getting off the bus.
If the cost did not mean we had to release the core players of this team.
If he would play here.
If we can protect him
Then yes. There is a whole lot of if in there. We would be foolish not to. If he is the difference for the Colts to be 11-5 one year and 3-13 the next, what would he do to an 8-8 team? He would be a 14 point a game advantage getting off the bus.
#15
#16
Posted 25 January 2012 - 06:22 AM
S-Dubb, on 25 January 2012 - 12:37 AM, said:
Most posters should take this advice. 
Bunch of negative Nancy's around here.
Bunch of negative Nancy's around here.
Yeah, the only negative things you are allowed to say are about Sanchez (and anyone else that held Holmes and Ryan back)!

Exterminate all rational thought, that is the conclusion I have come to
#18
#19
#20
Posted 25 January 2012 - 09:23 AM
Haven't we been down this road before? We went through this with Favre so I''m gonna say no. Let's look at the big picture he would not come cheap, there's no guarantee that would be healthly next year, and I'd rather us not pull the trigger and then have to start all over again in 3 years. The sensible thing would be if Houston let's Mario walk, go hard after him get us the pass rusher we so desperately need. and bring back BE. There are much better ways to spend our money than going after yet another aging superstar to sell tickets.

Sign In
Register
Help

Add Reply




MultiQuote













