Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plaxico Burress Has Little Praise For Sanchez, Tebow
#1
Posted 21 June 2012 - 05:31 PM
According to Pro Football Talk, Burress refused to offer any compliments of Sanchez despite repeated softballs lobbed his way. When asked if Sanchez could lead the Jets to the Super Bowl, Burress replied, "They just paid him, so I think they believe he is."
Obviously, that wasn't the question. Burress again was asked if Sanchez could lead the Jets to a title, not if the Jets thought he could.
"Um, I think the defense will," Burress said. "I think they definitely have a Super Bowl defense."
OK then. Burress is similarly unimpressed with the Jets' new backup quarterback, Tim Tebow.
"As a starting wide receiver in the NFL, you walk out there on Sunday and line up," Burress said. "It's not Peyton Manning back there."
It's times like this when you wonder if Burress has any level of self-awareness. The guy is desperately searching for a job, but he doesn't realize it might not come off well if you go on national television and slyly disparage your former quarterback.
We're not saying a five-minute spot on some morning show will keep Burress out of the NFL. But it doesn't help.

#2
Posted 21 June 2012 - 05:36 PM
#5
Posted 24 June 2012 - 01:23 PM
#7
Posted 25 June 2012 - 01:08 AM
SecondHandJets, on 21 June 2012 - 08:29 PM, said:
Terrible signing? He may have not been the fastest, and he may have dogged routes, but in one year the Jets went from one of the worst teams in red zone efficency to one of the better ones. What happened between those two years? Oh yea Plax was signed and scored tds in the redzone, thats right.
You can hate the guy, you can say he is one dimmensional, but to say he was a terrible signing when had a huge impact in drastically improving our redzone offense is just asinine.
#8
Posted 25 June 2012 - 04:50 PM
Clemens11, on 25 June 2012 - 12:08 AM, said:
You can hate the guy, you can say he is one dimmensional, but to say he was a terrible signing when had a huge impact in drastically improving our redzone offense is just asinine.
I gotta agree with this, he at the very least attracted coverage in the redzone and made some huge catches for us. I definitely don't think he's the classiest guy in the world, but it wasn't a bad signing at all - and he was not even close to the worst element in the locker room last year.
#9
Posted 25 June 2012 - 05:20 PM
NYJETSFAN1, on 25 June 2012 - 02:50 PM, said:
the fact we relied on him to be a starter right out of prison was stupid. he had a nice niche in the red zone and made some nice catches but it was management fault for miscasting him. had we had a real #2 and used plax as a number 3 we would have done better
#10
Posted 25 June 2012 - 08:19 PM
Jetsfan115, on 25 June 2012 - 06:20 PM, said:
Agreed
#11
Posted 26 June 2012 - 01:01 AM
Jetsfan115, on 25 June 2012 - 06:20 PM, said:
no arguements here with that statement.
#12
Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:08 PM
Jetsfan115, on 25 June 2012 - 06:20 PM, said:
When I was ranting and raving last June, I was the asshole. Now we all agree. Letting BE walk out for pennies and paying Plax more was retarded.
#13
Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:31 PM
SecondHandJets, on 26 June 2012 - 01:08 PM, said:
I think everyone here was in agreement that we should have kept braylon. I'd even take him right now for a vet minimum 1 year in case hill has toruble adjusting. schiillens and kerly aren't starting material so were relying on a rookie who came from a triple option offense
#15
Posted 27 June 2012 - 11:17 AM
santana, on 26 June 2012 - 05:49 PM, said:
True but this season he would be more of a role player/ comfort level player with the offense. What if hill doesn't catch on quickly? what if holmes gets hurt?
#16
Posted 27 June 2012 - 12:23 PM
Jetsfan115, on 26 June 2012 - 04:31 PM, said:
Not everyone
#17
Posted 27 June 2012 - 04:50 PM
Jetsfan115, on 27 June 2012 - 05:17 PM, said:
But I thought Hill was bound to be the real deal from day one?! ;)
With Burress, there's a reason why he hasn't caught on anywhere else. A solid red zone threat, but he offers little else outside of that part of the field. If anybody is considering signing him, they'll face the tough question of whether they'll be willing to have a #3 receiver who won't be a threat on every down and who can't offer anything special teams wise as a returner.
#18
Posted 28 June 2012 - 09:42 AM
Smedsthejet, on 27 June 2012 - 02:50 PM, said:
With Burress, there's a reason why he hasn't caught on anywhere else. A solid red zone threat, but he offers little else outside of that part of the field. If anybody is considering signing him, they'll face the tough question of whether they'll be willing to have a #3 receiver who won't be a threat on every down and who can't offer anything special teams wise as a returner.
Lol he is but shit happens. what if he blows out his ACL in a freak injury in preseason?
#20
Posted 29 June 2012 - 12:52 PM
Smedsthejet, on 28 June 2012 - 12:39 PM, said:
That is exactly what came to mind as I read that comment myself. The jets have more than their share of bad luck. Have you ever noticed when guys like Phil Simms says something like "Folk hasn't missed from inside 40 yards in 12 kicks"?
What is the next thing that happens? You got it; wide right!

Sign In
Register
Help

Add Reply


MultiQuote



















