Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Great Article On The Defense Agree in part, dissent in part
#3
Posted 07 September 2012 - 03:35 AM
HurricaneJet32, on 06 September 2012 - 03:07 PM, said:
You're so intelligent...thank you for enlightening me!
Not that there is any validity to the author's points... Keep your head buried in the sand, moron.
#4
Posted 09 September 2012 - 06:12 PM
So how about you enlighten us like you were asked to do rather than just calling people moron or do you not have the intellectual capabilities to do so? Oh. That's right. We won today so we won't see you. Dickhead.
When someone annoys u, it takes 42 muscles in ur face 2 frown. BUT, it only takes 4 muscles 2 extend ur arm & b!tch-slap that mother@*?!&! upside the head!!
#5
Posted 09 September 2012 - 06:20 PM
Quote
Nope.

New York Jets
Super Bowl III Champions

Los Angeles Lakers
16-times NBA World Champions
1949, 1950, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1972, 1980, 1982, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2009, 2010
#6
Posted 10 September 2012 - 11:04 AM
FlyHiJets, on 09 September 2012 - 07:12 PM, said:
So how about you enlighten us like you were asked to do rather than just calling people moron or do you not have the intellectual capabilities to do so? Oh. That's right. We won today so we won't see you. Dickhead.
I'd be happy to ya big dummy. First of all gentlemen, let's not start sucking each other's dicks just yet. It was the Bills. I have never been afraid of Fitzpatrick. Our secondary, when it mattered, played very well. Yet I did notice a few things. Not much of a push up front from our defensive line. I didn't see much of a pass rush. Even Maybin didn't do much from the edge. I will watch the game again to reassess. Just as Ray Lucas pointed out in the post game, "Great defenses step on the neck of other teams and break them when a team is up big."
Bart Scott was horrible yesterday. The first Spiller ridiculous video game run was partially his fault and he recognized that on the sideline. Sloppiness and laziness. The Jets D got lazy when they were up 41-14. They were flat footed and slow. After watching that game, are you any less concerned about covering Brady's tight ends when New England comes to town?
I am very happy about the win and very pleased with Sanchez, the offensive line and Steven Hill. Santonio Holmes acted like a little baby in the locker room with reporters. He makes me sick. Nonetheless, this article, and your childish attempt to provoke me, was about the defense. And unless you watched the game through rose colored lenses, you'll recognize that my concerns are valid. Talk to me after the Pittsburgh game. I do hope I am very wrong.
#8
Posted 10 September 2012 - 12:11 PM
HarlemHxC814, on 10 September 2012 - 12:12 PM, said:
It is not an analogy. It is called an expression and one I will continue to use if so inclined. Focus on the points I evinced rather than misnomerizing my sentences. How's that for "considerably awkward."
#9
Posted 10 September 2012 - 12:57 PM
Also, Pouha didn't play. We have a rookie in Quinton Coples and a 2nd year guy really getting his 1st real crack with the starters. So thankfully it's week 1, the Jets will correct their issues defending the run (a staple of a Rex Ryan defense) and this defense will only get better.
Same can be said for an offense that has new parts and a new O.C. Whats scary is we should be better in both phazes towards the end of the year when it matters.
#10
Posted 10 September 2012 - 01:16 PM
Camenzind, on 10 September 2012 - 01:11 PM, said:
I actually don't focus on anything you post, nor does the vast majority of the board. Yay I'm glad you know big words though.
#11
Posted 10 September 2012 - 04:09 PM
HarlemHxC814, on 10 September 2012 - 02:16 PM, said:
"Big" is a subjective term. I understand any word with more than two syllables might cause you some difficulties so I will work on that.
You don't focus on what I write because your maturity level rivals that of a 12-year old. You want to read only what you simply want to believe. The truth might get in the way.
#13
Posted 10 September 2012 - 05:53 PM
#14
Posted 12 September 2012 - 05:27 PM
When someone annoys u, it takes 42 muscles in ur face 2 frown. BUT, it only takes 4 muscles 2 extend ur arm & b!tch-slap that mother@*?!&! upside the head!!
#15
Posted 12 September 2012 - 07:16 PM
Camenzind, on 10 September 2012 - 01:11 PM, said:
HOLY SHIT you're such a douche bag. Overcompensating much? One of the best pieces of advice you can give anyone is to keep things simple; the shortest and simplest way of saying something is almost always the best.
Plus, I'm pretty sure misnomerizing isn't a word...genius.
#16
Posted 12 September 2012 - 07:26 PM
HurricaneJet32, on 12 September 2012 - 08:16 PM, said:
You're correct. It's not a word. Then again I could just be misnomerizing myself.

New York Jets
Super Bowl III Champions

Los Angeles Lakers
16-times NBA World Champions
1949, 1950, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1972, 1980, 1982, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2009, 2010
#18
Posted 13 September 2012 - 12:06 PM
Camenzind, on 07 September 2012 - 04:35 AM, said:
The article does point out some issues that will either have been as a result of a lopsided score or a problem. I was at the game and was a bit surprised that Spiller ran all over us. I was also surprised that we couldn't really pressure Fitzpatrick when it was obvious he had to throw. And I didn't see our offensive line opening big holes for our running game.
Having said that, I was blown away by Sanchez, Hill, Kerley and our defensive backs. So I would say if Parcells was our coach he would feast on the things we didn't do well in order to keep the team focused. But we have every reason to be ecstatic with the way the game went - especially as we really didn't blitz or give too much away.
I would venture a guess that 98% of Jet fans feel a lot better about the team now then they did last week at this time.
So trying to take everyone's enthusiasm away and then calling them morons for not wanting to focus on the negative is a sure way to deflect whatever point you were trying to make in favor of a release of your obvious frustrations.
#19
Posted 14 September 2012 - 08:27 AM
Dissent is, by definition, to differ in sentiment or opinion, especially from the majority.
The majority here would be that the Jets defense is going to be a great unit, yet you are "dissenting" from the guy who is saying the Jets defense will not be great...which is certainly not the majority.
Look, I just helped out with your SAT's kid!

Sign In
Register
Help

Add Reply


MultiQuote









