NYJetsFan.com Forums: Jets @ 1-1 On The Season. - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

JETS LACK OF REDZONE OFFENSE STILL CURSING THE DEFENSE
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 10:41 PM) That's flag 101 never looking back and pushing the WR
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 10:41 PM) How is that not PI?
RetireChrebet Icon : (Yesterday, 10:41 PM) Never looked for the ball for a second
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 10:42 PM) Fuck this game fuck the refs fuck this team fuck the season. I'm over this shit
RetireChrebet Icon : (Yesterday, 10:42 PM) That's bullshit
RetireChrebet Icon : (Yesterday, 10:43 PM) On the bright side we get to play Detroit, San Diego, NE and denver in our next 4 games
Mr_Jet Icon : (Yesterday, 10:44 PM) Oh look the refs gave the Jets another timeout. A timeout the Jets didn't even have. SMDH
RetireChrebet Icon : (Yesterday, 10:45 PM) Until we get rid of geno smith we are going nowhere. Bottom line. Dude is more erratic than romo
Mr_Jet Icon : (Yesterday, 10:45 PM) I'm really not feeling Geno Smith.
RetireChrebet Icon : (Yesterday, 10:45 PM) Or any other QB in the league. Trade for Sanchez Now!
RetireChrebet Icon : (Yesterday, 10:45 PM) We'd be 3-0 with Sanchez
SokeSleezy Icon : (Yesterday, 10:46 PM) Geno's needs to work on his accuracy,Stafford gonna kill us next week smh
XvNukemHighvX Icon : (Yesterday, 10:46 PM) Yeah gonna go with a good old f*** Geno this week. He is still playing better than last year though
RetireChrebet Icon : (Yesterday, 10:46 PM) People saying Sanchez sucks keep in mind he never had a chance to play in morningwegs system. He was held back by shottenheimer
Mr_Jet Icon : (Yesterday, 10:47 PM) This team will never have a franchise QB. We can't draft them and when we sign or trade for them, they're past their primes.
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 10:48 PM) well
XvNukemHighvX Icon : (Yesterday, 10:48 PM) Because we destoy any promise in our young QBs with our elite offensive support talent.
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 10:48 PM) TIME TO CHANGE THE DIAPER
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 10:48 PM) another game next week
Chaos Icon : (Yesterday, 10:48 PM) 3-0 with Sanchez? Oh god...we've gone there already?
Chaos Icon : (Yesterday, 10:49 PM) jets need more talent on O
Chaos Icon : (Yesterday, 10:49 PM) and some god damn DBs
Mr_Jet Icon : (Yesterday, 10:49 PM) Morninweg's system is get the offense going then throw a monkey wrench into things by putting the backup QB in there and f***ing up the offense's rhythm.
RetireChrebet Icon : (Yesterday, 10:50 PM) Yes I went there. Geno spots these teams 7-10 points weekly and has turned the ball in the redzone 3 games in a row. If not for 2 dropped ints geno would have 4 picks. Dude sucks at best
RetireChrebet Icon : (Yesterday, 10:51 PM) Then we got Chris ivory running like marshawn lynch out there and they sit him on the bench the whole fourth quarter
XvNukemHighvX Icon : (Yesterday, 10:52 PM) I'd like to use the same excuse I used for Sanchez. QB can't really do shit when your best WR would be a #3 if he was lucky on any other team
Chaos Icon : (Yesterday, 10:52 PM) yeah but sanchez was shell shcoked
Chaos Icon : (Yesterday, 10:52 PM) jets werent fixing him
XvNukemHighvX Icon : (Yesterday, 10:53 PM) Geno will be to after another year or two of this shit.
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 10:53 PM) What's kerleys contract like
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 10:53 PM) because if he's underpaid I don't see him sticking around
XvNukemHighvX Icon : (Yesterday, 10:54 PM) he only looks good because our O is so bad.
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 10:54 PM) I bet a lot of teams have their eye on him
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 10:56 PM) Decker doesn't need to play until he is completely healthy
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Yesterday, 10:58 PM) FIRE IDZIK
RetireChrebet Icon : (Yesterday, 11:08 PM) How big was the Sheldon Richardson fumble recovery not being a TD. We quickly went three and out after that
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 11:43 PM) Idzik better not be stingy this offseason and address the biggest issues we have WR and Secondary
RetireChrebet Icon : (Yesterday, 11:47 PM) King mo says he's ok, injury is minor
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 09:21 AM) As a guy who has been on this site since its inception and is still not a moderator which I guess is cause I'm not part of the rat pack who runs this joint I think GENO should still be the starter.
mgjetman Icon : (Today, 10:19 AM) We still could have won this game with the bad calls. Geno just sucks. All the pick six's, missing wide open receivers, bad throws when they are fought. Stupid trick plays because they don't trust him.
santana Icon : (Today, 10:31 AM) I don't get his decision making
santana Icon : (Today, 10:32 AM) There were another 2-3 ints the bears were gifted but were dropped
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Today, 11:22 AM) f***
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Today, 11:22 AM) I had a blast at the game... just sucks we lost
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Today, 11:22 AM) 1-3 when I go se them
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1

Jets @ 1-1 On The Season. Everyone is hating on us already.

#1 User is offline   JSOTF Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,326
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:El Paso

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 19 September 2012 - 03:34 PM

I have been out of the loop all week and kind of wanted to put all my thoughts togther in one post. So here goes, hope I dont bore the f*** out of all of you.

Jets, week 1. Defense looked really good when it mattered. Obviously I would have liked to see some better tackling in the second half, but overall, 3 takeaways that lead to scores is always a positive. I thought Sanchez looked SHARP. He made a brain fart (actually 2) on his flip off the shoulder pad that was picked. But he looked comfortable with the offense. He was desisive with the ball, and made good reads of the defense. I was not particularly happy about the excessive ammount of Tebow snaps, but all in all, I thought it was a good gameplan that was executed well. On to the Steelers.....

I thought the Jets didnt play all that poorly. Yes, there was some bad tackling of Ben, but overall not bad considering Revis was out. I gotta say this though, we couldnt get our defense off the field in the second half. Our D made 2 stops and forced Pit to go 3 and out, but otherwise, that last 14 play drive, was horrnedous. The Jets defense was holding and holding and then 1st down. all the way through the drive. If we could have tackled Ben on our 5 or 6 shots at him, we may have had a better chance. Also, there was the run, where Landry I believe ripped the ball out of the RB, was challenged and not reversed (actually thought he did rip it out, but his knee was down for a 3 yard loss prior to that play. I thought the refs missed both calls there)

I was a little pissed off though at our lack of confidence of our offense at the end of the half. We had a decent kick return, to the Jets 32, 2 timeouts, and we ran once, and then we took a knee to run out the half. I am not going to say that caused us the game, but I do believe that was an opportunity to at least even bring in Tebow, maybe try a type of run/pass to see if we can catch Pit sleeping. It almost seems like in the first game, the use of Tebow was somewhat of a hinderence to Sanchez good play, but in the second game, where it may have been helpfull (I believe there were 2 plays with Tebow at QB) one was that long run and the other was a 9 yard run I believe. (I am not calling for Tebow to come in and play in place of Sanchez, and I understand that hindsite is always easier than real time)

Now on Sanchez's behalf, I thought the recievers dropped about 4 or 5 balls. I believe the deep pass to Hill, should have been caught, I think as Hill gets his feeling for the NFL defenders better, he can realize he could outjump the cb or safety that came over and caused him to drop it. (There was contact before the catch, Hills hand was smacked by the defender) Point being, it could have easily been a score. Holmes dropped a few, and the TE (Cumberland I think) didnt pick up on Sanchezs autible an a 3rd down, where maybe Keller does and we get a first down. But he did not make those bonehead throws that he did very frequently under Shitty.

So, all in all, I think we are a better team than all these 'analysts' are giving us credit for. You add Revis to the mix, he probably takes 100 passing yards away from the Steelers alone. The interior D held the Steelers Run game to a 2.4 YPC, not bad at all, and a huge improvement from the run D in week 1.

So, fire away!
0

#2 User is offline   extmenace Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,640
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tallahassee / Sarasota, FL

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 19 September 2012 - 04:49 PM

I know its early in the week and betting line movements aren't nearly as accurate this early in the season, put already 72% of public on jets. Jets started at -3 and the line has already fallen to -1. Prepare your self, with that kind of line movement this early...not looking good. And if thats the case, prepare for more of these analysts to crap on the jets. Dammit dammit....week 3 loss to the dolphins for first place would be terrible.

"I'm glad that the Gillette field was soft and messy
since I spent so much time down on it."-Tom Brady


17 POINTS!
0

#3 User is offline   A1elbow Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,890
  • Joined: 07-October 09

  • NFL Team:

Posted 20 September 2012 - 12:26 AM

View PostJSOTF, on 19 September 2012 - 03:34 PM, said:

I have been out of the loop all week and kind of wanted to put all my thoughts togther in one post. So here goes, hope I dont bore the f*** out of all of you.

Jets, week 1. Defense looked really good when it mattered. Obviously I would have liked to see some better tackling in the second half, but overall, 3 takeaways that lead to scores is always a positive. I thought Sanchez looked SHARP. He made a brain fart (actually 2) on his flip off the shoulder pad that was picked. But he looked comfortable with the offense. He was desisive with the ball, and made good reads of the defense. I was not particularly happy about the excessive ammount of Tebow snaps, but all in all, I thought it was a good gameplan that was executed well. On to the Steelers.....

I thought the Jets didnt play all that poorly. Yes, there was some bad tackling of Ben, but overall not bad considering Revis was out. I gotta say this though, we couldnt get our defense off the field in the second half. Our D made 2 stops and forced Pit to go 3 and out, but otherwise, that last 14 play drive, was horrnedous. The Jets defense was holding and holding and then 1st down. all the way through the drive. If we could have tackled Ben on our 5 or 6 shots at him, we may have had a better chance. Also, there was the run, where Landry I believe ripped the ball out of the RB, was challenged and not reversed (actually thought he did rip it out, but his knee was down for a 3 yard loss prior to that play. I thought the refs missed both calls there)

I was a little pissed off though at our lack of confidence of our offense at the end of the half. We had a decent kick return, to the Jets 32, 2 timeouts, and we ran once, and then we took a knee to run out the half. I am not going to say that caused us the game, but I do believe that was an opportunity to at least even bring in Tebow, maybe try a type of run/pass to see if we can catch Pit sleeping. It almost seems like in the first game, the use of Tebow was somewhat of a hinderence to Sanchez good play, but in the second game, where it may have been helpfull (I believe there were 2 plays with Tebow at QB) one was that long run and the other was a 9 yard run I believe. (I am not calling for Tebow to come in and play in place of Sanchez, and I understand that hindsite is always easier than real time)

Now on Sanchez's behalf, I thought the recievers dropped about 4 or 5 balls. I believe the deep pass to Hill, should have been caught, I think as Hill gets his feeling for the NFL defenders better, he can realize he could outjump the cb or safety that came over and caused him to drop it. (There was contact before the catch, Hills hand was smacked by the defender) Point being, it could have easily been a score. Holmes dropped a few, and the TE (Cumberland I think) didnt pick up on Sanchezs autible an a 3rd down, where maybe Keller does and we get a first down. But he did not make those bonehead throws that he did very frequently under Shitty.

So, all in all, I think we are a better team than all these 'analysts' are giving us credit for. You add Revis to the mix, he probably takes 100 passing yards away from the Steelers alone. The interior D held the Steelers Run game to a 2.4 YPC, not bad at all, and a huge improvement from the run D in week 1.

So, fire away!


I haven't heard a lot of talk about that, but it was something that upset me at the time. We have receivers capable of hitting some big gains, but we don't even take a shot or two at midfield to see if we can get into position? I was disappointed.
Posted Image


Exterminate all rational thought, that is the conclusion I have come to
0

#4 User is offline   JSOTF Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,326
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:El Paso

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 September 2012 - 09:57 AM

@ A1ELBOW.

I agree. I like the chances we have with Hill. I think we should have at least taken a deep shot on 1st down. I understand the call because you dont want to turn the ball over there and give Pit a chance to add a quick score. But this year we have thrown the ball deep more than we did last year with Shitty. I also think we could have at least tried for a FG, maybe help get Sanchez into rythem.
0

#5 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,488
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 September 2012 - 10:05 AM

Yes sitting with basically 2 min and 2 TOs, we packed it in for no good reason. The analysts praised it reminding the viewer that Sanchez fumbled right before the half against Pittsburgh in 2010... like that shit matters. When we run our no huddle, our offense clicks as good as any offense. We have 2 slot recievers (Tone and Kerley) as well as a guy that can go deep. Why we packed it in at the half and wasted that 1:48 (and ate the 2 TOs) is beyond me.
0

#6 User is offline   JSOTF Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,326
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:El Paso

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 September 2012 - 10:50 AM

View PostSecondHandJets, on 20 September 2012 - 09:05 AM, said:

Yes sitting with basically 2 min and 2 TOs, we packed it in for no good reason. The analysts praised it reminding the viewer that Sanchez fumbled right before the half against Pittsburgh in 2010... like that shit matters. When we run our no huddle, our offense clicks as good as any offense. We have 2 slot recievers (Tone and Kerley) as well as a guy that can go deep. Why we packed it in at the half and wasted that 1:48 (and ate the 2 TOs) is beyond me.


Didnt the comentator say after the return, the Jets got good field position off that return? Remind you, Sanchez started the game hot, and really just needed to be able to find that rythem again. I really think Sanchez is playing much better than he has in the previous years. His QBR is up and he looks to have a better feel of the gameplan. I wish we would have at least tried a deep pass. to see if we could get downfield into fieldgoal range.
0

#7 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,488
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 September 2012 - 10:58 AM

Sanchez is playing noticeably better and he should have had a much better game on Sunday had our WRs actually held on to the ball. Once Keller comes back, I expect Sanchez to take off.
0

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users