NYJetsFan.com Forums: Jets @ 1-1 On The Season. - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

Lee lee lee lee lee lee lee Lee la la lee le lee leeeee
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 10:02 PM) Lawson is more of a de. We already have too many of those. We only have 1 proven LBer and he's 32 and we run a 3-4. Lee is a day 1 starter
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 10:03 PM) Broncos traded up for lynch
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 10:41 PM) Round 1 is done
2JBallar01 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 12:43 AM) He will play ILB for us.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 11:08 AM) http://nyjetsfan.com...showtopic=38865
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 11:19 AM) jets tried to trade up for tunsil but the price was too high
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 05:10 PM) Tunsil will end up out of the league
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 05:12 PM) Lee isn't a pass rusher, hes a fast athletic LB. Hes probably their future at ILB, someone who can cover in the middle
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 06:16 PM) jets said he's an ILB for us
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 06:17 PM) If we could grab jack he would be an OLB
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 06:17 PM) ttians have 3 picks in the next 13 picks
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 06:33 PM) jack to jax 36th overal
ganggreen2003 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 06:33 PM) Did you hear that the 1st round pick for the Browns RETIRED after getting drafted
SoReALSoJetS Icon : (29 April 2016 - 07:29 PM) Hi guys long time no talk hope everyone is well
Mr_Jet Icon : (29 April 2016 - 07:46 PM) SMH
ganggreen2003 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 07:46 PM) JETS drafted QB Hackenberg PSU
Mr_Jet Icon : (29 April 2016 - 07:47 PM) Should have picked Connor Cook.
MikeGangGree... Icon : (29 April 2016 - 07:56 PM) I guess we are giving up on petty
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 09:02 PM) Or giving up on geno
Jetsfan115 Icon : (29 April 2016 - 09:02 PM) I said the rumor was they liked him more then cook
Mr_Jet Icon : (29 April 2016 - 11:35 PM) I know I'm biased, but I've seen them both play. Cook is just better. Hackenberg had one good year. Cook has won more games, played in big games and won them....whatever, its done now so no sense on dwelling on it I guess. I just don't see the appeal in Hackenberg, nice kid, but I always thought he was really overrated. Oh well. I would have taken Kevin Hogan over Hackenberg.
azjetfan Icon : (30 April 2016 - 03:47 PM) From what I have read so far he had a great freshman year under Obrien in a pro style offense. At that point some considered him the next Andrew luck. Then Obrien left and they shifted to a spread under new HC who did poor job bringing in talent. He was also sacked and hit a million times. Might be shell shocked.
Smedsthejet Icon : (01 May 2016 - 06:17 AM) But Chan Gailey runs a spread system - still, I'm comfortable with the Hackenberg pick seeing as Gailey will develop the system to suit his strength... I'm just glad that we passed on Paxton Lynch in the first...we still desperately need Fitz to re-sign though
azjetfan Icon : (01 May 2016 - 07:14 PM) From my understanding the spread in college and the spread in NFL are not the same principals. I really think it was more of a talent issue and getting sacked 80 times in 2 years that did him in. I have no idea if he will make it. I don't follow college ball enough to to know. Theses are just things I read in articles.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (02 May 2016 - 10:24 AM) I'm stoked about getting peake in the 7th round. that was a steal. he was a projected 3rd rounder. wonder what scared teams away
Jetsfan115 Icon : (02 May 2016 - 06:05 PM) Jets Invite Terron Beckham(Odell's Cousin) to Minicamp
Jetsfan115 Icon : (02 May 2016 - 06:06 PM) Listed as a RB had more bench presses and highest vertical of anyone this year. Hasn't played football since high school and apparently not very smart
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2016 - 05:16 PM) The Jets had Hackenberg as their #2 rated QB
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2016 - 05:16 PM) Apparently, they loved Golf and tried to trade up. When that failed, their #2 QB was Hackenberg, they fell in love with his football IQ
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (03 May 2016 - 05:17 PM) It would be a mistake to start him right away, hes a guy who needs development. He has the talent, and apparently he has good leadership skills and football IQ. His mechanics are off though
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (10 May 2016 - 12:25 PM) Is this street thug Ryan Fitzpatrick ever gonna sign?
SecondHandJets Icon : (11 May 2016 - 02:03 PM) Hey guy
SecondHandJets Icon : (11 May 2016 - 02:03 PM) Is everyone excited for the Geno Smith Era?
SecondHandJets Icon : (11 May 2016 - 02:04 PM) Finally the kid can show us what he can do
SecondHandJets Icon : (11 May 2016 - 02:04 PM) I know Mr Jet is excited
SecondHandJets Icon : (11 May 2016 - 02:04 PM) I know Harlem is too
SecondHandJets Icon : (11 May 2016 - 02:04 PM) GO TEAM!
Jetsfan115 Icon : (18 May 2016 - 10:40 AM) from the looks of it, nobody is excited lol
santana Icon : (18 May 2016 - 10:27 PM) I'm excited for geno smith. His jaw will survive the off season.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (19 May 2016 - 06:26 PM) not true, never know who might punch him
MikeGangGree... Icon : (21 May 2016 - 05:38 PM) f*** Geno smith
MikeGangGree... Icon : (21 May 2016 - 05:39 PM) J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS!!!
mgjetman Icon : (Yesterday, 02:01 PM) Geno really needs to go away. Double f**k Geno.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 02:21 PM) Fitzpatrick said he wants to play for the jets and that he won't retire
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:50 PM) This street thug Darron Lee hasn't signed yet
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1

Jets @ 1-1 On The Season. Everyone is hating on us already.

#1 User is offline   JSOTF Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,332
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:El Paso

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 19 September 2012 - 03:34 PM

I have been out of the loop all week and kind of wanted to put all my thoughts togther in one post. So here goes, hope I dont bore the f*** out of all of you.

Jets, week 1. Defense looked really good when it mattered. Obviously I would have liked to see some better tackling in the second half, but overall, 3 takeaways that lead to scores is always a positive. I thought Sanchez looked SHARP. He made a brain fart (actually 2) on his flip off the shoulder pad that was picked. But he looked comfortable with the offense. He was desisive with the ball, and made good reads of the defense. I was not particularly happy about the excessive ammount of Tebow snaps, but all in all, I thought it was a good gameplan that was executed well. On to the Steelers.....

I thought the Jets didnt play all that poorly. Yes, there was some bad tackling of Ben, but overall not bad considering Revis was out. I gotta say this though, we couldnt get our defense off the field in the second half. Our D made 2 stops and forced Pit to go 3 and out, but otherwise, that last 14 play drive, was horrnedous. The Jets defense was holding and holding and then 1st down. all the way through the drive. If we could have tackled Ben on our 5 or 6 shots at him, we may have had a better chance. Also, there was the run, where Landry I believe ripped the ball out of the RB, was challenged and not reversed (actually thought he did rip it out, but his knee was down for a 3 yard loss prior to that play. I thought the refs missed both calls there)

I was a little pissed off though at our lack of confidence of our offense at the end of the half. We had a decent kick return, to the Jets 32, 2 timeouts, and we ran once, and then we took a knee to run out the half. I am not going to say that caused us the game, but I do believe that was an opportunity to at least even bring in Tebow, maybe try a type of run/pass to see if we can catch Pit sleeping. It almost seems like in the first game, the use of Tebow was somewhat of a hinderence to Sanchez good play, but in the second game, where it may have been helpfull (I believe there were 2 plays with Tebow at QB) one was that long run and the other was a 9 yard run I believe. (I am not calling for Tebow to come in and play in place of Sanchez, and I understand that hindsite is always easier than real time)

Now on Sanchez's behalf, I thought the recievers dropped about 4 or 5 balls. I believe the deep pass to Hill, should have been caught, I think as Hill gets his feeling for the NFL defenders better, he can realize he could outjump the cb or safety that came over and caused him to drop it. (There was contact before the catch, Hills hand was smacked by the defender) Point being, it could have easily been a score. Holmes dropped a few, and the TE (Cumberland I think) didnt pick up on Sanchezs autible an a 3rd down, where maybe Keller does and we get a first down. But he did not make those bonehead throws that he did very frequently under Shitty.

So, all in all, I think we are a better team than all these 'analysts' are giving us credit for. You add Revis to the mix, he probably takes 100 passing yards away from the Steelers alone. The interior D held the Steelers Run game to a 2.4 YPC, not bad at all, and a huge improvement from the run D in week 1.

So, fire away!
0

#2 User is offline   extmenace Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,647
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tallahassee / Sarasota, FL

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 19 September 2012 - 04:49 PM

I know its early in the week and betting line movements aren't nearly as accurate this early in the season, put already 72% of public on jets. Jets started at -3 and the line has already fallen to -1. Prepare your self, with that kind of line movement this early...not looking good. And if thats the case, prepare for more of these analysts to crap on the jets. Dammit dammit....week 3 loss to the dolphins for first place would be terrible.

"I'm glad that the Gillette field was soft and messy
since I spent so much time down on it."-Tom Brady


17 POINTS!
0

#3 User is offline   A1elbow Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,892
  • Joined: 07-October 09

  • NFL Team:

Posted 20 September 2012 - 12:26 AM

View PostJSOTF, on 19 September 2012 - 03:34 PM, said:

I have been out of the loop all week and kind of wanted to put all my thoughts togther in one post. So here goes, hope I dont bore the f*** out of all of you.

Jets, week 1. Defense looked really good when it mattered. Obviously I would have liked to see some better tackling in the second half, but overall, 3 takeaways that lead to scores is always a positive. I thought Sanchez looked SHARP. He made a brain fart (actually 2) on his flip off the shoulder pad that was picked. But he looked comfortable with the offense. He was desisive with the ball, and made good reads of the defense. I was not particularly happy about the excessive ammount of Tebow snaps, but all in all, I thought it was a good gameplan that was executed well. On to the Steelers.....

I thought the Jets didnt play all that poorly. Yes, there was some bad tackling of Ben, but overall not bad considering Revis was out. I gotta say this though, we couldnt get our defense off the field in the second half. Our D made 2 stops and forced Pit to go 3 and out, but otherwise, that last 14 play drive, was horrnedous. The Jets defense was holding and holding and then 1st down. all the way through the drive. If we could have tackled Ben on our 5 or 6 shots at him, we may have had a better chance. Also, there was the run, where Landry I believe ripped the ball out of the RB, was challenged and not reversed (actually thought he did rip it out, but his knee was down for a 3 yard loss prior to that play. I thought the refs missed both calls there)

I was a little pissed off though at our lack of confidence of our offense at the end of the half. We had a decent kick return, to the Jets 32, 2 timeouts, and we ran once, and then we took a knee to run out the half. I am not going to say that caused us the game, but I do believe that was an opportunity to at least even bring in Tebow, maybe try a type of run/pass to see if we can catch Pit sleeping. It almost seems like in the first game, the use of Tebow was somewhat of a hinderence to Sanchez good play, but in the second game, where it may have been helpfull (I believe there were 2 plays with Tebow at QB) one was that long run and the other was a 9 yard run I believe. (I am not calling for Tebow to come in and play in place of Sanchez, and I understand that hindsite is always easier than real time)

Now on Sanchez's behalf, I thought the recievers dropped about 4 or 5 balls. I believe the deep pass to Hill, should have been caught, I think as Hill gets his feeling for the NFL defenders better, he can realize he could outjump the cb or safety that came over and caused him to drop it. (There was contact before the catch, Hills hand was smacked by the defender) Point being, it could have easily been a score. Holmes dropped a few, and the TE (Cumberland I think) didnt pick up on Sanchezs autible an a 3rd down, where maybe Keller does and we get a first down. But he did not make those bonehead throws that he did very frequently under Shitty.

So, all in all, I think we are a better team than all these 'analysts' are giving us credit for. You add Revis to the mix, he probably takes 100 passing yards away from the Steelers alone. The interior D held the Steelers Run game to a 2.4 YPC, not bad at all, and a huge improvement from the run D in week 1.

So, fire away!


I haven't heard a lot of talk about that, but it was something that upset me at the time. We have receivers capable of hitting some big gains, but we don't even take a shot or two at midfield to see if we can get into position? I was disappointed.
Posted Image


Exterminate all rational thought, that is the conclusion I have come to
0

#4 User is offline   JSOTF Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,332
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:El Paso

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 September 2012 - 09:57 AM

@ A1ELBOW.

I agree. I like the chances we have with Hill. I think we should have at least taken a deep shot on 1st down. I understand the call because you dont want to turn the ball over there and give Pit a chance to add a quick score. But this year we have thrown the ball deep more than we did last year with Shitty. I also think we could have at least tried for a FG, maybe help get Sanchez into rythem.
0

#5 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,493
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 September 2012 - 10:05 AM

Yes sitting with basically 2 min and 2 TOs, we packed it in for no good reason. The analysts praised it reminding the viewer that Sanchez fumbled right before the half against Pittsburgh in 2010... like that shit matters. When we run our no huddle, our offense clicks as good as any offense. We have 2 slot recievers (Tone and Kerley) as well as a guy that can go deep. Why we packed it in at the half and wasted that 1:48 (and ate the 2 TOs) is beyond me.
0

#6 User is offline   JSOTF Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,332
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:El Paso

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 September 2012 - 10:50 AM

View PostSecondHandJets, on 20 September 2012 - 09:05 AM, said:

Yes sitting with basically 2 min and 2 TOs, we packed it in for no good reason. The analysts praised it reminding the viewer that Sanchez fumbled right before the half against Pittsburgh in 2010... like that shit matters. When we run our no huddle, our offense clicks as good as any offense. We have 2 slot recievers (Tone and Kerley) as well as a guy that can go deep. Why we packed it in at the half and wasted that 1:48 (and ate the 2 TOs) is beyond me.


Didnt the comentator say after the return, the Jets got good field position off that return? Remind you, Sanchez started the game hot, and really just needed to be able to find that rythem again. I really think Sanchez is playing much better than he has in the previous years. His QBR is up and he looks to have a better feel of the gameplan. I wish we would have at least tried a deep pass. to see if we could get downfield into fieldgoal range.
0

#7 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,493
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 20 September 2012 - 10:58 AM

Sanchez is playing noticeably better and he should have had a much better game on Sunday had our WRs actually held on to the ball. Once Keller comes back, I expect Sanchez to take off.
0

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users