NYJetsFan.com Forums: Jets Offense - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

Bring something to the table!
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (14 February 2015 - 02:45 PM) but they picked up the options for Jason Babin and Calvin Pace, I ask why? Pace blows
Chaos Icon : (14 February 2015 - 04:00 PM) no rush to cut them now
Chaos Icon : (14 February 2015 - 04:01 PM) they both cost 125k to keep now and are not guaranteed a roster spot. they can get cap savings by removing them later
Chaos Icon : (14 February 2015 - 04:01 PM) 125k each. 250k total.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (14 February 2015 - 05:19 PM) I think they should keep Babin, he was actually our best pass rusher last season despite 2 sacks. He had a lot of QB pressures in limited snaps.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (14 February 2015 - 05:20 PM) There are some good edge rushers available in FA, I hope we sign one
santana Icon : (15 February 2015 - 11:16 AM) http://i.imgur.com/kVeGR5F.jpg
azjetfan Icon : (15 February 2015 - 01:01 PM) Doug free will be an UFA
ganggreen2003 Icon : (15 February 2015 - 05:48 PM) BREAKING NEWS: GLOBAL WARMING IS A MYTH
ganggreen2003 Icon : (15 February 2015 - 11:23 PM) When the hell will the JETS get it that Pace SUCKS
ganggreen2003 Icon : (15 February 2015 - 11:23 PM) Babin being brought back isn't a big deal but Pace really?
azjetfan Icon : (16 February 2015 - 12:43 AM) There is no guarantee either will be on the roster opening day. This gives the Jets the most options in FA and the draft. For once I would love to see Jet fans not jump before the need
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (16 February 2015 - 12:39 PM) I'd cut Pace, we easily can upgrade over him in FA
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (16 February 2015 - 12:40 PM) Babin I'd keep , he had more QB pressures in way less snaps than Pace. And is cheap.
MikeGangGree... Icon : (17 February 2015 - 11:27 PM) its time to bring this back..........
MikeGangGree... Icon : (17 February 2015 - 11:27 PM) SUCK FOR THE DUCK
santana Icon : (18 February 2015 - 12:32 PM) THE BEETS
santana Icon : (18 February 2015 - 02:38 PM) HALA MADRID
MikeGangGree... Icon : (18 February 2015 - 02:46 PM) TEH MOTHER f***ing BEETS
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (18 February 2015 - 03:32 PM) Jets met with Josh McCown
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (18 February 2015 - 06:25 PM) Please no
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (19 February 2015 - 12:28 PM) Reports say Jets to go hard after CJ Spiller. Bring him aboard, he'll be a good signing. Was a stud in Chan's offense and RBs don't cost much
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (20 February 2015 - 12:09 PM) Saw that the Bills are meeting with Spiller and may sign him before FA.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (20 February 2015 - 12:10 PM) if that happens, I think the Jets should go after Shane Vereen. Nice pass catching option out of the backfield, only 25.
Smedsthejet Icon : (20 February 2015 - 04:06 PM) Think Vereen would be a great option...I thought he was one of their best and most valuable performers during the playoffs and we need a back who can contribute in the passing game as well. Jets have been missing that piece since LT retired
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (21 February 2015 - 01:41 PM) Mariota ran a 4.52
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (21 February 2015 - 01:41 PM) Fastest for a QB since RG3
MikeGangGree... Icon : (21 February 2015 - 03:52 PM) SUCK FOR THE DUCK
ganggreen2003 Icon : (22 February 2015 - 04:46 PM) BREAKING NEWS: The New York JETS will be trading their #6 pick to Tampa Bay's #1 pick for a BAG of Shit and Darrelle Revis after he is signed in FA and sent back to Tampa Bay. - Source is Tom LaCanfora Glazer de la Menefee
santana Icon : (24 February 2015 - 03:18 PM) UEFA TIME
Chaos Icon : (Yesterday, 09:46 AM) http://seattle.sunti...-video-released
2JBallar01 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:54 PM) @RapSheet: The #Packers released LB AJ Hawk, their former first-round pick. It saves them $3.5M this year, which comes off their cap
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 05:13 PM) @AdamSchefter 58s59 seconds ago
Jaguars expected to hire former Jets GM John Idzik as a consultant, per source.
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:04 PM) FIRE IDZIK
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:52 PM) AJ Hawk getting cut means that the Packers are going to try real hard to lock up Cobb
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:52 PM) and the Lions released oft injured Reggie Bush
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 07:29 PM) The Packers had the cap space to lock up Cobb regardless
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 07:30 PM) But Bryan Bulaga is also a FA< so they have 2 important guys to re-sign. I think the OT is more important for Rodgers
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 09:17 PM) 22 days 21 hours 27 min till FIRST DAY OF SPRING!!!!!
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 10:06 PM) If we get rid of Harvin, Kevin White looks like a nice replacement.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 10:06 PM) 6'3 runs a 4.35 and had elite production in college
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 03:38 PM) NOT SO BREAKING NEWS: WINTER SUCKS
santana Icon : (Today, 03:41 PM) Lol Liverpool
santana Icon : (Today, 03:42 PM) epl teams sucking ass this year
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Today, 04:41 PM) The Jills are negotiating with Josh "Tears of" McCown
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1

Jets Offense Sanchez's Performance

#1 User is offline   JSOTF Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,330
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:El Paso

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 22 October 2012 - 12:17 PM

1st Drive: 11 Plays, 75 yards 4:44 TOP. 7-0 JETS
Sanchez was 2 of 5 for passing. Hill Dropped a long pass, The Pats held Keller on what would have been a TD (Penalty was called) and Shillins had a drop too.

2nd Drive: 3 and out 7-7
Sanchez is sacked and completes a pass shorrt of the 1st Down.

3rd Drive: 1 Play Safety
Sanchez kicks fumble out of the endzone. Damn Wilfort blew this play up.

4th Drive: 7 Plays 47 Yards, INT
Sanchez is 2 of 5 and badly underthrows Hill, could have been a TD, this is all on Sanchez. I do think Hill has to learn to adjust his route though. But if Sanchez doesnt pump fake to the left, he has a easier throw to a wide open Hill. Sanchez had a long completion to Kerley on this drice and a nice pass to Keller to convert a 3rd Down.

5th Drive: 12 Plays, 60 Yards, FG
Jets get the ball with 3:43 left and have a nice drive for a FG. But I wish we had better time management here, I know you dont want to give Bradt the ball back, but I think we were very lazy with a chance here to get a TD.
Sanchez is 6 for 9 on this drive.
End of half: NE16-Jets 10

6th Drive: 11 Plays, 66 Yards, FG
Sanchez is 3 of 4 on this drive and another quick slant on 3rd and 2. Pats knew it was coming and Schillins didnt catch the damn ball. This was mind boggling. 3rd and 2 from the 3, and we get an incomplete and kick the FG.....Where was the run game? Or even Tebow here? We left points on the field here, and this one is not on Sanchez.

7th Drive: 3 and out.
BS Holding call on a 15 yard scramble. Greene drops a throw in the flat, may have been a loss if he catches it.

8th Drive: 14 Plays, 91 Yards. TD
Sanchez is 9 of 10. Good drive after starting with a false start penalty. This was where Greene got KO'd. NE 23-Jets 20

9th Drive: 6 Plays, 40 yards, Game Tying FG.
Sanchez is 1 of 2. Drive ends on a drop by Hill. No at all on Sanchez. If Hill makes this catch, we at least have 1st and goal. Hill would have been 1 on 1 with the Safety.

10th Drive: 4 Plays -7 yards.
Sanchez is sacked here after no gainer from Tebow and a 2 yard run by McKnight. We kicked the FG to take a 3 point lead. Why you bring Tebow here, but not on 3rd and 2 from the 3 yard line?
We take the lead here with a FG.

11th Drive (OT): 5 Plays, 26 yards.
Sanchez obviously fumbles on 2nd down. I am going to check this one, but on 3rd and 5, we threw a deep route here to Hill, he was held at the LOS, and that was a 5 yard penalty. But I think it was a great call to get away from the slants here. But a great hold if you are a Pats fan.


Overall, I give Sanchez a B- on his performance. I think it was one of his better games. The INT is completely on him. The fumble in OT is on him to an extent, he is trying to make a play there and lost the ball.
0

#2 User is offline   JSOTF Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,330
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:El Paso

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 24 October 2012 - 01:18 PM

:sterb041: I completely disagree with this asshole!!!
0

#3 User is offline   extmenace Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,644
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tallahassee / Sarasota, FL

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 24 October 2012 - 03:50 PM

See the problem here is that I was talking to a buddy of mine about the game the other day and said that sanchez "actually had a pretty decent game." I did not blame him for the loss but after talking about it more...it hit me. We are so used to mediocre QB play that when sanchez plays an average game, some of us jets fans consider it a good game. The expectations for sanchez is so low at this point, if he doesn't down right suck, everyone gives sanchez some credit. For a back up QB coming in after a starter goes down, or a first or 2nd year QB playing a really tough opponent...that's an an ok mentality. For a 4th year QB who was drafted 5th overall...not ok.

"I'm glad that the Gillette field was soft and messy
since I spent so much time down on it."-Tom Brady


17 POINTS!
0

#4 User is offline   JSOTF Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,330
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:El Paso

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 25 October 2012 - 02:47 PM

View Postextmenace, on 24 October 2012 - 02:50 PM, said:

See the problem here is that I was talking to a buddy of mine about the game the other day and said that sanchez "actually had a pretty decent game." I did not blame him for the loss but after talking about it more...it hit me. We are so used to mediocre QB play that when sanchez plays an average game, some of us jets fans consider it a good game. The expectations for sanchez is so low at this point, if he doesn't down right suck, everyone gives sanchez some credit. For a back up QB coming in after a starter goes down, or a first or 2nd year QB playing a really tough opponent...that's an an ok mentality. For a 4th year QB who was drafted 5th overall...not ok.


Interesting point. But lets look at something here.

For the first 3 years of Sanchezs carear, his offensive coordinator was Brian Shottenhiemer. A OC that has a very complex offense, and the more I saw it, I was not impressed from QB view of it. I recall when Sanchez was taking us to the playoffs and Rex had taken over the offensive playcalling, Rex had a set of plays that he had that would limit Sanchezs mistakes as a young QB going into the playoffs. I really think that when we had a recievers like Edwards, Cothcery (it think Coles too) we were a run first team. We also were lucky to have one of the better offensive lines too. But with such a complex offense, Sanchez really struggled.

Now that OC is gone, and we have a new OC. I believe it takes time for these two to sinc up. Sporanno needs to develop on some of Sanchezs strenghts, but now we are not a run team, and we dont have quality recievers and we are asking a guy to learn a new system and do it without any continuity (minus Keller). During the game against the Pats, I saw Sanchez mis 2 wide open WRs on critical 2nd and 3rd down plays. He almost never looked to his left (where McKnight was standing alon) or to the right (where #87 was running also wide open). We have got to give this guy at least 2 season IMO, because he was drafted for the long haul. In this past game against the Pats, The INT was all on Sanchez. He recognized the coverage and then through the ball late. (I also think with some Chemistry with a WR, this may not happen, Sanchez may not realize the speed of Hill, and Hill doesnt recognize he needs to be able to make a play in that senareo based on the defense). If his sits down there instead of continueing, Sanchez probably has a completion. (If Hill doesnt deop the ball). I still think there is hope for Sanchez.
0

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users