Stephen Hill Is Terrible
Posted 19 November 2012 - 03:10 PM
Quote from my wife when I told her I liked Tebow, but that he sucks as a QB
Posted 19 November 2012 - 04:08 PM
Trust me it doesn't take much time or effort.
New York Jets
Super Bowl III Champions
Los Angeles Lakers
16-times NBA World Champions
1949, 1950, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1972, 1980, 1982, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2009, 2010
Posted 19 November 2012 - 04:41 PM
People have to also realize that he was brought in to be a number 2 opposite of holmes who attracted the most attention. Now most of the attention is on him as he is seeing the double teams due to his speed over kerly outside. kerly was supposed to be the slot guy but is starting now. then on 3 WRs either gates or schillens takes teh outside and kerly slides inside which again means that hill is seeing the double teams
Posted 19 November 2012 - 05:12 PM
Posted 19 November 2012 - 05:31 PM
Absolutely not true. Hill is not being doubled. You know why? Because at this point he's a non factor. Everytime he's in the play, he's single covered. When the pass hit him in his GODDAMN FACEMASK he wasn't doubled. He was singled and had his man beat. Hill, flat out, cannot catch. You can quote whatever statistic you want and throw whatever name in there you can find, but if you watch the game, you see that Hill has absolutely no hands. If you find the statistic, I'd like to see the % of Hill's passes dropped to targets.
Posted 19 November 2012 - 05:33 PM
It doesn't matter whether he's a rookie or not. Rookie WRs need time to acclimate to the speed of the NFL. True. Rookie WRs need time to learn the NFL route tree. True. When has a rookie WR needed time to learn how to CATCH? You're a Wide Reciever... operative word is RECIEVER. It's in his damn job description! You want to put him letting the ball go through his hands and hitting him in his facemask on Sanchez? Should Sanchez have wrapped the ball in some duct tape for him?
We drafted Kerley with Ryan here. Kerley is light years ahead of Hill.