NYJetsFan.com Forums: Team-By-Team Strength Of Schedule For 2013 - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

Lee lee lee lee lee lee lee Lee la la lee le lee leeeee
azjetfan Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:26 PM) Who?
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:27 PM) WTF
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:27 PM) BULLSHIT PICK
ganggreen2003 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:27 PM) A LB from Ohio State
azjetfan Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:27 PM) Defiantly not an inspiring pick
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:28 PM) GHOLSTON 2.0
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:28 PM) Guy has had 12 sacks in 2 years?? how the hell is that a 1st round pass rusher
ganggreen2003 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:29 PM) At least we didn't go QB again
ganggreen2003 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:30 PM) You mean GHOSTon
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:31 PM) Not f***ing happy
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:31 PM) I hope I'm wrong tho
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:31 PM) if I'm wrong I will eat m crow
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:39 PM) Some mocks had him top 10
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:42 PM) this guy is small
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:45 PM) Most mocks had Lee at 17 to the Falcons
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:45 PM) He's a day 1 starter for us. We've needed OLB forever
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:46 PM) Plus we generate a great rush from wilk rich and Williams
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:50 PM) I wanted Lawson bad
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:50 PM) f***ing bills
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:51 PM) Lee fills a need better
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:52 PM) I would have liked tunsil to slide to us though. After east picking great
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:52 PM) Would you take Lee over Lawson?
azjetfan Icon : (28 April 2016 - 09:55 PM) I'm not inspire by that pick. Not even a little
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 10:01 PM) Wasn't an option. Lawson was gone
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 10:02 PM) Lawson is more of a de. We already have too many of those. We only have 1 proven LBer and he's 32 and we run a 3-4. Lee is a day 1 starter
Jetsfan115 Icon : (28 April 2016 - 10:03 PM) Broncos traded up for lynch
MikeGangGree... Icon : (28 April 2016 - 10:41 PM) Round 1 is done
2JBallar01 Icon : (Yesterday, 12:43 AM) He will play ILB for us.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 11:08 AM) http://nyjetsfan.com...showtopic=38865
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 11:19 AM) jets tried to trade up for tunsil but the price was too high
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 05:10 PM) Tunsil will end up out of the league
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 05:12 PM) Lee isn't a pass rusher, hes a fast athletic LB. Hes probably their future at ILB, someone who can cover in the middle
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:16 PM) jets said he's an ILB for us
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:17 PM) If we could grab jack he would be an OLB
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:17 PM) ttians have 3 picks in the next 13 picks
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:33 PM) jack to jax 36th overal
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:33 PM) Did you hear that the 1st round pick for the Browns RETIRED after getting drafted
SoReALSoJetS Icon : (Yesterday, 07:29 PM) Hi guys long time no talk hope everyone is well
Mr_Jet Icon : (Yesterday, 07:46 PM) SMH
ganggreen2003 Icon : (Yesterday, 07:46 PM) JETS drafted QB Hackenberg PSU
Mr_Jet Icon : (Yesterday, 07:47 PM) Should have picked Connor Cook.
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 07:56 PM) I guess we are giving up on petty
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 09:02 PM) Or giving up on geno
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 09:02 PM) I said the rumor was they liked him more then cook
Mr_Jet Icon : (Yesterday, 11:35 PM) I know I'm biased, but I've seen them both play. Cook is just better. Hackenberg had one good year. Cook has won more games, played in big games and won them....whatever, its done now so no sense on dwelling on it I guess. I just don't see the appeal in Hackenberg, nice kid, but I always thought he was really overrated. Oh well. I would have taken Kevin Hogan over Hackenberg.
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1

Team-By-Team Strength Of Schedule For 2013

#1 User is offline   HarlemHxC814 Icon

  • 06 Best Avatar Award / N.O.P. GUARD
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 5,173
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 09 February 2013 - 06:58 PM

Quote

Team-by-team strength of schedule for 2013
NFL.com
Published: Feb. 7, 2013 at 05:10 p.m. Updated: Feb. 7, 2013 at 08:34 p.m. 0 Likes | 0 Comments
Email Print
Read Discuss
The Carolina Panthers have the toughest road to the Super Bowl based on the strength of their 2013 schedule.

The Panthers will play teams in 2013 with a combined 138-116-2 record from last season as they look to improve on their 7-9 mark in 2012.

See where your team ranks below:

2013 Strength of schedule
Team
SOS
Opponent record
Carolina Panthers
.543
138-116-2
Detroit Lions
.539
138-118-0
New Orleans Saints
.539
137-117-2
St. Louis Rams
.539
137-117-2
Baltimore Ravens
.535
137-119-0
Green Bay Packers
.533
136-119-1
Arizona Cardinals
.520
131-121-4
Miami Dolphins
.520
133-123-0
San Francisco 49ers
.520
132-122-2
Minnesota Vikings
.516
132-124-0
Seattle Seahawks
.516
130-122-4
Cincinnati Bengals
.508
130-126-0
Jacksonville Jaguars
.508
129-125-2
New England Patriots
.508
130-126-0
Atlanta Falcons
.504
128-126-0
Chicago Bears
.502
128-127-1
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
.500
127-127-2
Washington Redskins
.498
127-128-1
New York Jets
.496
127-129-0
Philadelphia Eagles
.496
127-129-0
Cleveland Browns
.492
126-130-0
Pittsburgh Steelers
.496
126-130-0
Tennessee Titans
.488
124-130-2
New York Giants
.480
123-133-0
Dallas Cowboys
.480
121-134-1
Buffalo Bills
.473
121-135-0
Houston Texans
.473
120-134-2
Kansas City Chiefs
.473
121-135-0
Oakland Raiders
.469
120-136-0
Indianapolis Colts
.461
117-137-2
San Diego Chargers
.457
117-139-0
Denver Broncos
.430
110-146-0

Posted Image
0

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users