NYJetsFan.com Forums: Why Are Jets Overthinking This? - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

azjetfan Icon : (21 April 2015 - 09:52 AM) He is a good QB and I would love to have him. However IMO our 6 is not good value for us. Not to mention if he hates the idea of LA what is he going to think of NY? Contract situation would have to be worked out prior to trade as well. Extreme long shot to land Rivers. My money says we are more likely to land Brees.
azjetfan Icon : (21 April 2015 - 09:53 AM) which is still a very long shot
Chaos Icon : (21 April 2015 - 10:46 AM) he may just hate ownership. LT's comments yesterday was interesting.
Chaos Icon : (21 April 2015 - 10:47 AM) “I personally don’t think so,” Tomlinson said. “I really think this is a situation where Philip Rivers wants to move on. The reason why I think that and the reason why I feel like that is the Chargers have already approached Philip about doing another contract and he declined it. He doesn’t want anything to do with it; he didn’t even want to talk about another contract with the San Diego Chargers. That tells me that he’s thinking about moving on.”

“You never want to trade your franchise quarterback,” Tomlinson said, “that’s never the case. However, in this situation they might have no choice but to do so because I don’t know if Philip [Rivers] wants to be there anymore. I think he’s lost confidence in the organization. He’s seeing a lot of changes going on and the L.A. thing is valid; him not wanting to go to L.A., that is very valid, I can see that. So no, it doesn’t make sense to move on from Philip because he’s a franchise quarterback and he still has three to four very good years left.”
Chaos Icon : (21 April 2015 - 10:47 AM) missed the LA line. nvm. guess that is a legit concern.
Mr_Jet Icon : (21 April 2015 - 03:57 PM) He doesn't want to play for a franchise based in Los Angeles, but he'd be okay with playing for one based in New York City?
azjetfan Icon : (21 April 2015 - 04:28 PM) That's the point we have all been making.
MikeGangGree... Icon : (21 April 2015 - 07:05 PM) Jets vs colts Monday night week2
MikeGangGree... Icon : (21 April 2015 - 07:09 PM) Jets open at home against the browns
ganggreen2003 Icon : (21 April 2015 - 07:52 PM) Week 5 Bye after the London Game against the Dolphags
NJAzrael71 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 09:17 AM) Rivers is likely going to Tennessee. Would LOVE to have him here but we likely won't make the trade. I'd easily give this year and next year
NJAzrael71 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 09:17 AM) 's first rounder for him
azjetfan Icon : (22 April 2015 - 11:03 AM) IMO that's a steep price. I would swap this years first and a conditional 1st next year. Assuming we make the AFC Championship. That would be a 28-32nd pick. Otherwise a second.
MikeGangGree... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 01:07 PM) Yes 2 1st is a lot
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 01:10 PM) draft is next week, pumped
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 03:02 PM) What are thoughts on getting a RB in round 1? McShay's newest mock has us taking Gurley at 6. I don't think we should take him that high, but if we trade down and he's available I'd love to snag him, ACL and all. He's got an unreal skill set that, once healthy, will translate readily to the NFL. We're not getting a QB this year without paying a king's ransom, and unless we pay a ransom for a top guy I say ignore QB. I don't want us to take a Hundley or Petty type in the 2nd or 3rd round when we need other pieces (edge rush, OL)
azjetfan Icon : (22 April 2015 - 03:09 PM) We can probably get Gordon in the second. I would pass at 6. If QB is not available a pass rusher will be. Our biggest needs are QB Pass rusher and Oline.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 03:34 PM) any thourghts on shane ray? i see a lot of mocks have us drafting him
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 04:35 PM) last one i seen had us taking cooper, a RB, and hundley for our 1st 3 picks. not thrilled about that
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 04:38 PM) I don't like Gordon much. Not much of a receiver or blocker, ball security issues, tries to bounce outside too much, stuffed frequently. Gurley is in a league of his own
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 04:39 PM) Ray is pretty highly regarded. I'm betting he, Dupree, and Gregory will be our best options as well as edge rushers at 6, but I think that's too high for any of them
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 04:43 PM) Personally love Cooper, I know WR isn't our biggest need but he may be the most NFL ready guy in the Draft. If we stick to the 6th pick and Fowler, Beasley, and Mariota are gone, Cooper is the guy to get. I'd even take him over Beasley
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 05:45 PM) i don't mind cooper. decker isn't number 1 IMO and marshall is expensive and getting old
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 05:45 PM) and we never draft a WR high
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 05:45 PM) but o-line and QB are huge needs. i wouldn't take o-line 6th overall, but i think our 2nd or 3rd should be o-line
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 05:46 PM) we need an OLB as well. if we don't land a QB i'd like to see OLB adn O-line with 2 of our top 3 picks
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 08:16 PM) I agree on Deck, not a true #1 and he's had a checkered history with injuries. Marshall has 2, maybe 3 productive years left, which is why Cooper is an option
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 08:17 PM) And I agree with you on edge rusher & OL being bigger needs, but there really isn't a lineman I'd take at 6
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 08:19 PM) So the way I see it, assuming Winston and Mariota are taken when we're at 6, that Fowler and Cooper are our best choices, and I'd be stunned if Fowler drops. I wouldn't be surprised (or upset) if we land Cooper
NJAzrael71 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 08:47 PM) Apparently Tennessee wanted both of Cleveland's #1's and their 2nd rounder to move up to the #2 spot to get Mariota. Still think two 1st rounders are too much for Rivers? He makes us instant contenders and if we make a deep playoff run, it would really be this year's 1st and what equates to basically a 2nd rounder next year.
If not, get Cooper in the 1st and then grab Hundley in the 2nd and O-line in the 3rd.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:05 PM) I wouldn't be upset with Cooper, hes a stud
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:06 PM) Not sure about Ray. Dupree is rising on the draft boards, ridiculously athletic for his size
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:07 PM) Dupree is 6'4 270 and has a amazing get off and runs a 4.5
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:09 PM) Problem is he doesn't have big sack numbers in college, I rather draft a productive guy high
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:09 PM) Vic Beasley is insanely athletic as well and was hugely productive in college, good bet is that Beasley will be a 10+ sack guy in the NFL
NJAzrael71 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:12 PM) Beasley should be a stud but he gets caught up hand fighting if he doesn't beat his guy quickly. He'll likely end up as an OLB but we'll see
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:15 PM) He'd be a good fit in our defense, because we could use that speed guy on the outside
Chadforpresi... Icon : (23 April 2015 - 06:27 AM) I'd love Rivers, but we should be able to get him without paying 2 first rounders
Chadforpresi... Icon : (23 April 2015 - 06:29 AM) Lot of buzz about Dupree going top 10, most mocks I see have us getting either Ray or Dupree at 6. I prefer Dupree, like you said insane athlete for his size
Chadforpresi... Icon : (23 April 2015 - 06:30 AM) I like Beasley as well but I have a strong feeling Washington will snag him. But he is a small dude, it'd be nice if he'd add some bulk (in Clemson reportedly played around 230)
Chaos Icon : (23 April 2015 - 10:11 AM) @ArifHasanNFL

.@LanceZierlein says on http://sports790.com that Shane Ray will need surgery on foot, 5 months recovery. "Could drop out of first"
Chaos Icon : (23 April 2015 - 10:14 AM) this should change up the top 10
Chadforpresi... Icon : (23 April 2015 - 12:16 PM) Damn that's big. If he drops out of round 1 that could be a massive bargain for whoever gets him round 2. Dupree now looks more like the edge rusher we'd get at 6
MikeGangGree... Icon : (24 April 2015 - 09:40 PM) TEH RANGERS
santana Icon : (24 April 2015 - 11:32 PM) TEH WIZ
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1

Why Are Jets Overthinking This?

#1 User is offline   RetireChrebet Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 596
  • Joined: 30-March 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NV
  • Interests:Football, mma, yanks, basketball

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 26 March 2013 - 04:08 PM

It's obvious both parties (jets and Revis) want to part ways. No QB is worth trading up for this season so trade Revis for a second rounder this year to the buc's and 2014's first rounder. This way we have presumably a top 10 pick next year (ours) and an additional top 20 pick(bucs). Package those two picks together for the first or second overall and scoop up Teddy Bridgewater and get this team moving in the right direction. We will have ridiculous money to spend for additional weapons in 2014 for the rookie and this years draft(13') should be focused on stockpiling starters not necessarily stars. Best case scenario is we go 1-15 have the first pick overall anyway plus an additional first rounder.
0

#2 User is offline   Jetsfan0099 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 17,113
  • Joined: 30-July 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Jersey

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 26 March 2013 - 04:22 PM

We have no idea what teams are really offering. And there is a good chance that the Bucs 1st rounder this year will be higher than next years.


I have no problem with the Jets waiting it out, try to get the best deal possible. The Bucs are backing off of the other CBs on the market, we are still like 4 weeks away from the draft.
Posted Image
0

#3 User is online   HarlemHxC814 Icon

  • 06 Best Avatar Award / N.O.P. GUARD
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 5,160
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 26 March 2013 - 06:29 PM

Honestly, a first and second (regardless of the year) in my opinion isn't really good enough. Whoever wants him is going to have to come off of more than that, I feel.
Posted Image
0

#4 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,489
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 26 March 2013 - 10:24 PM

View PostRetireChrebet, on 26 March 2013 - 05:08 PM, said:

It's obvious both parties (jets and Revis) want to part ways. No QB is worth trading up for this season so trade Revis for a second rounder this year to the buc's and 2014's first rounder. This way we have presumably a top 10 pick next year (ours) and an additional top 20 pick(bucs). Package those two picks together for the first or second overall and scoop up Teddy Bridgewater and get this team moving in the right direction. We will have ridiculous money to spend for additional weapons in 2014 for the rookie and this years draft(13') should be focused on stockpiling starters not necessarily stars. Best case scenario is we go 1-15 have the first pick overall anyway plus an additional first rounder.


What if Teddy Bridgewater breaks his arm in seven places and never plays football again?

Anyway, first off, we don't know what Revis wants and we don't know what the Jets want. I can tell you that Rex Ryan wants Revis here and since Rex Ryan is either a lame duck coach who will be fired or Woody's Rasputin who is making all the personnel decisions, we don't know wtf is going on in Florham Park. We do know one thing: Revis wants to be paid. We also know that the Jets are going to have a shit ton of money in 2014, 2015 and 2016. The "leaked" numbers from Revis' deal is about $13.5M per year, which is basically what we paid him on his last deal. I'm less certain the Jets are going to trade him than I was a month ago.

The Bucs offer is bullshit. I hate that people are even taking it seriously. Yea, next year's draft is projected to be better, but who cares? I guarantee you that there will be players who aren't even mocked today who will go in the Top 15 in 2014 and vice versa. The standard for discountieng draft picks is one round per future year. The Bucs are essentially giving us a 2nd and 3rd in 2013. I think that that's cheap as hell and the Jets can get that type of offer anytime. If we're dead set on trading Revis, which no one know for sure we are since we have no idea who's making personnel decisions, we'd be wise to hold out for a better package.
0

#5 User is offline   NJAzrael71 Icon

  • Formerly FlyHi
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,648
  • Joined: 06-August 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NJ

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 27 March 2013 - 11:12 AM

The sad thing is that this looking like it's going to be a 18 million dollar one year rental for Mevis unfortunately.
I will not be forgotten. This is my time to shine. I've got the scars to prove it. Only the strong survive.

When someone annoys u, it takes 42 muscles in ur face 2 frown. BUT, it only takes 4 muscles 2 extend ur arm & b!tch-slap that mother@*?!&! upside the head!!
0

#6 User is online   HarlemHxC814 Icon

  • 06 Best Avatar Award / N.O.P. GUARD
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 5,160
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 27 March 2013 - 12:13 PM

Lol
Posted Image
0

#7 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,489
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 27 March 2013 - 02:05 PM

View PostFlyHiJets, on 27 March 2013 - 12:12 PM, said:

The sad thing is that this looking like it's going to be a 18 million dollar one year rental for Mevis unfortunately.


The Bucs reprtedly have worked out a deal with Revis where he'd make a little over $13M a year. Where are you coming up with $18M?
0

#8 User is offline   Smedsthejet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 8,275
  • Joined: 10-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 27 March 2013 - 02:55 PM

View PostRetireChrebet, on 26 March 2013 - 09:08 PM, said:

It's obvious both parties (jets and Revis) want to part ways. No QB is worth trading up for this season so trade Revis for a second rounder this year to the buc's and 2014's first rounder. This way we have presumably a top 10 pick next year (ours) and an additional top 20 pick(bucs). Package those two picks together for the first or second overall and scoop up Teddy Bridgewater and get this team moving in the right direction. We will have ridiculous money to spend for additional weapons in 2014 for the rookie and this years draft(13') should be focused on stockpiling starters not necessarily stars. Best case scenario is we go 1-15 have the first pick overall anyway plus an additional first rounder.



Considering it cost the Redskins three first round picks and a second round selection to move up from No.6 to No. 2 to take RG III last year, we'd need far more than the Bucs' first rounder next year to package with ours if we were to move up to No.1 overall in 2014 to take Bridgewater.


I'm with Harlem on this - a 1st and 2nd rounder is nowhere near enough for Revis. A once in a generation talent (even if he is coming back from an injury) and there's so much talk about trading him - it's madness!
0

#9 User is offline   RetireChrebet Icon

  • Line Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 596
  • Joined: 30-March 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NV
  • Interests:Football, mma, yanks, basketball

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:00 PM

View PostSmedsthejet, on 27 March 2013 - 03:55 PM, said:

Considering it cost the Redskins three first round picks and a second round selection to move up from No.6 to No. 2 to take RG III last year, we'd need far more than the Bucs' first rounder next year to package with ours if we were to move up to No.1 overall in 2014 to take Bridgewater.


I'm with Harlem on this - a 1st and 2nd rounder is nowhere near enough for Revis. A once in a generation talent (even if he is coming back from an injury) and there's so much talk about trading him - it's madness!



Believe me I'd love to keep Revis on this team. He's easily my favorite jet of all time but its been proven that a CB does not win superbowls. QB's do. Revis is in my opinion our pawn that would potentially allow the jets to get that QB that will have us in playoff contention year in year out. Like I said in previous post. Maybe we'll keep Revis, pay him the money and still get a top 3 pick based on our teams poor record that we all project is ahead anyway.

Besides I understand Revis is a once in a decade defender but lets be honest. There is a big difference between being the best CB in the league and let's say best WR,RB, or even linebacker. Being the best CB in the league just doesn't have the impact on games that these other high profile positions have. Sure Revis will shut down the opposing teams best reciever but is that really going to prevent the rest of the mediocre defenders from getting picked apart by Brady, Bree's, manning etc..
0

#10 User is online   HarlemHxC814 Icon

  • 06 Best Avatar Award / N.O.P. GUARD
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 5,160
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:45 PM

I can't get into another debate about trading Revis again. I just can't. Ill just say that a bunch of you are full of shit because if he's dealt you'll all bitch that the Jets don't have any CBs who can cover receivers. I wonder if there's a select group of Vikings fans who cream themselves at the thought of Peterson being traded
Posted Image
0

#11 User is offline   sexyrexy Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 291
  • Joined: 24-January 10

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 28 March 2013 - 09:24 AM

View PostHarlemHxC814, on 27 March 2013 - 07:45 PM, said:

I can't get into another debate about trading Revis again. I just can't. Ill just say that a bunch of you are full of shit because if he's dealt you'll all bitch that the Jets don't have any CBs who can cover receivers. I wonder if there's a select group of Vikings fans who cream themselves at the thought of Peterson being traded


I don't want Revis traded either, but you're comparing apples and oranges by bringing up Peterson. Peterson is locked into a long term agreement with (I think) no history of holding out. Revis is a pending free agent who has a history of holding out to get the deal he wants.
"My first thought was I looked and I saw who was second and [thought], 'Hey, I finally beat Belichick at something. I got him. I knew it would take time, but I finally got him.'"
--Rex Ryan on being voted the most overrated NFL head coach
0

#12 User is online   HarlemHxC814 Icon

  • 06 Best Avatar Award / N.O.P. GUARD
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 5,160
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 28 March 2013 - 12:03 PM

View Postsexyrexy, on 28 March 2013 - 10:24 AM, said:

I don't want Revis traded either, but you're comparing apples and oranges by bringing up Peterson. Peterson is locked into a long term agreement with (I think) no history of holding out. Revis is a pending free agent who has a history of holding out to get the deal he wants.


My point was that there aren't really fans of other teams besides the Jets that are so eager and willing to trade away(at least it isn't as evident in my opinion) their once in a lifetime elite, game changing superstar. You could just as easily I'm that sentence substitute Peterson for a Patrick Willis or Calvin Johnson type
Posted Image
0

#13 User is offline   sexyrexy Icon

  • Special Teams
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 291
  • Joined: 24-January 10

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 28 March 2013 - 12:15 PM

View PostHarlemHxC814, on 28 March 2013 - 12:03 PM, said:

My point was that there aren't really fans of other teams besides the Jets that are so eager and willing to trade away(at least it isn't as evident in my opinion) their once in a lifetime elite, game changing superstar. You could just as easily I'm that sentence substitute Peterson for a Patrick Willis or Calvin Johnson type


The Revis situation is unique from them as well for the same reasons. Even as someone who wants Revis on the team, I have to admit that much.


Except for a select few, I don't think anyone was just going around screaming "TRADE REVIS" before all these rumors started surfacing. Now that those rumors are out there, some people think it would be best for the team's future to accelerate the rebuilding process. I understand both sides of the argument.

"My first thought was I looked and I saw who was second and [thought], 'Hey, I finally beat Belichick at something. I got him. I knew it would take time, but I finally got him.'"
--Rex Ryan on being voted the most overrated NFL head coach
0

#14 User is online   HarlemHxC814 Icon

  • 06 Best Avatar Award / N.O.P. GUARD
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 5,160
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 28 March 2013 - 12:21 PM

Some would want him traded for a box of condoms...but that's neither here nor there
Posted Image
0

#15 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,753
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 28 March 2013 - 02:03 PM

the jets do not want to part ways with the best defensive player in football and the bets player they've had in decades. the problem is the business side. there is teh cap, how much he will cost to keep, how much other needs we have, and what we can get. idzyk has to weigh his options. if revis walks next ear and we get nothing it would be a huge fail, if he pays him 15 mil it could hamper the teams cap room, if he trades and doesn't get anything good in rturn (bad value and picks bad players) he'll look bad. he has to wieght his optioins
Get it done MT
Posted Image
0

#16 User is offline   jetfan4life12 Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,140
  • Joined: 04-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boca Raton, FL

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 28 March 2013 - 07:06 PM

View PostSecondHandJets, on 26 March 2013 - 10:24 PM, said:

What if Teddy Bridgewater breaks his arm in seven places and never plays football again?

Anyway, first off, we don't know what Revis wants and we don't know what the Jets want. I can tell you that Rex Ryan wants Revis here and since Rex Ryan is either a lame duck coach who will be fired or Woody's Rasputin who is making all the personnel decisions, we don't know wtf is going on in Florham Park. We do know one thing: Revis wants to be paid. We also know that the Jets are going to have a shit ton of money in 2014, 2015 and 2016. The "leaked" numbers from Revis' deal is about $13.5M per year, which is basically what we paid him on his last deal. I'm less certain the Jets are going to trade him than I was a month ago.

The Bucs offer is bullshit. I hate that people are even taking it seriously. Yea, next year's draft is projected to be better, but who cares? I guarantee you that there will be players who aren't even mocked today who will go in the Top 15 in 2014 and vice versa. The standard for discountieng draft picks is one round per future year. The Bucs are essentially giving us a 2nd and 3rd in 2013. I think that that's cheap as hell and the Jets can get that type of offer anytime. If we're dead set on trading Revis, which no one know for sure we are since we have no idea who's making personnel decisions, we'd be wise to hold out for a better package.

Very well said SHJ
0

#17 User is offline   NJAzrael71 Icon

  • Formerly FlyHi
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,648
  • Joined: 06-August 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NJ

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 March 2013 - 11:03 AM

View PostSecondHandJets, on 27 March 2013 - 03:05 PM, said:

The Bucs reprtedly have worked out a deal with Revis where he'd make a little over $13M a year. Where are you coming up with $18M?


Easy....9 million for this year & the 9 million in dead money he counts against next year's cap. 9+9=18
I will not be forgotten. This is my time to shine. I've got the scars to prove it. Only the strong survive.

When someone annoys u, it takes 42 muscles in ur face 2 frown. BUT, it only takes 4 muscles 2 extend ur arm & b!tch-slap that mother@*?!&! upside the head!!
0

#18 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,489
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 March 2013 - 11:07 AM

View PostFlyHiJets, on 29 March 2013 - 12:03 PM, said:

Easy....9 million for this year & the 9 million in dead money he counts against next year's cap. 9+9=18


He won't count as dead money against the cap in 2014 because the Jets won't cut him. He has the option to opt out of the contract, if he does, that contract is nullified.
0

#19 User is offline   NJAzrael71 Icon

  • Formerly FlyHi
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,648
  • Joined: 06-August 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NJ

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 March 2013 - 11:18 AM

View PostSecondHandJets, on 29 March 2013 - 12:07 PM, said:

He won't count as dead money against the cap in 2014 because the Jets won't cut him. He has the option to opt out of the contract, if he does, that contract is nullified.


If he leaves via free agency, he counts 9 million against the cap in dead money in 2014. Check again.
I will not be forgotten. This is my time to shine. I've got the scars to prove it. Only the strong survive.

When someone annoys u, it takes 42 muscles in ur face 2 frown. BUT, it only takes 4 muscles 2 extend ur arm & b!tch-slap that mother@*?!&! upside the head!!
0

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users