NYJetsFan.com Forums: San Francisco 49Ers Could Look To Trade Up In Nfl Draft - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

Azjetfan is the nyjetsfan #1 pick
Chadforpresi... Icon : (Yesterday, 11:25 AM) I thought Collins said we'll withdraw if not picked by day 2
Chadforpresi... Icon : (Yesterday, 11:25 AM) But yeah hard to deny the value in getting Petty round 4
V DidDy 210 Icon : (Yesterday, 11:26 AM) i did not expect him or hundley to still be there past round 3 on thursday
V DidDy 210 Icon : (Yesterday, 11:26 AM) so picking him up is great
Mr_Jet Icon : (Yesterday, 11:30 AM) I want to be the first person to say it. "Broadway Bryce"
V DidDy 210 Icon : (Yesterday, 11:30 AM) imagine being a jaguars super fan haha
Chadforpresi... Icon : (Yesterday, 11:37 AM) Damn Vikes got Clemmings, in round 4 he's worth it
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 12:28 PM) Can we get a post with the selections
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 12:40 PM) It's tough to do with iPad but I'll get one started
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 01:01 PM) Jay Ajayi ?
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 01:02 PM) Maybe a Tyrus Thompson?
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 01:22 PM) Phi a took Ajaji
Smedsthejet Icon : (Yesterday, 01:33 PM) Some depth on the line with the Harrison pick
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 01:43 PM) I read the scouting report for Harrison, the scout said he has probowl talent but has a work ethic concern.
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 03:10 PM) Who the hell is Bryce petty
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 03:20 PM) Tom Pettys brother
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:22 PM) Jets should take Collins with one of their 7th rounders if there
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:22 PM) He has more upside for a 7th rounder than anyone else
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:22 PM) He can start right away at RT
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:29 PM) He said he won't sign
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:32 PM) so he doesn't want to be drafted?
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:33 PM) If Collins doesn't get drafted, he can't enter next years draft. He can only if he is drafted and sits out. So I guess he has to go undrafted
V DidDy 210 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:41 PM) going undrafted makes the most sense for collins
V DidDy 210 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:41 PM) but for teams, drafting him and dealing with his holdout makes more sense
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:19 PM) Zac Stacy was traded to us for our 7th
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:21 PM) Jets also drafted a NT with our other 7th
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:21 PM) 6'4 330 DL who is very strong
V DidDy 210 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:25 PM) zac stacy for a 7th
V DidDy 210 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:25 PM) well can't complain about that
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 04:29 PM) So we have 4 rbs now
V DidDy 210 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:31 PM) still would have rather taken a runner on collins but i can't complain with depth
V DidDy 210 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:32 PM) i mean they can't expect to carry 4 rb though no?
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 05:50 PM) Collins would have been a waste. He would not have signed. At least we have something to show for our pick. Worst case scenario is we trade or release one of our backs.
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 05:56 PM) I know it's hard to tell without seeing a win loss record yet but this regime seems really on point.
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 05:56 PM) For the first time in my life I can say I feel comfortable with the people making the decisions.
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 05:57 PM) I was close with Parcells but he seemed like a short term fixer and didn't care about the long term
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:57 PM) SUCK FOR THE DUCK
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 06:57 PM) .......oh wait
santana Icon : (Today, 01:13 AM) Well that was a disappointment
Chadforpresi... Icon : (Today, 01:24 AM) I like getting Stacy for our 7th rounder, assuming he can handle the fact he won't be a feature back (yikes)
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 09:31 AM) I like the trade, hes a quality back and adds more depth to our backfield
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 09:32 AM) Macc has pretty much killed it this offseason
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 09:32 AM) He has turned this roster around, he has added talent and competition all over.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 09:33 AM) We still aren't great at QB, but our overall football team is good. We have a realistic shot at making a playoff run
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Today, 09:33 AM) We may have the best defense in football. We have a great DL and secondary, that is gonna be tough on offenses when you can stop the run, pressure the QB, and blanket the receivers
Resize Shouts Area

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2

San Francisco 49Ers Could Look To Trade Up In Nfl Draft

#21 User is offline   azjetfan Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,139
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheese Land Baby
  • Interests:Football, golf, banking and home improvements

  • NFL Team:

Posted 24 April 2013 - 12:40 PM

View PostJetsfan115, on 23 April 2013 - 03:22 PM, said:

difference is sanchez isn't top 5. peyton maning got babaied, tom brady got babaied, brees, got babaied, rodgers got babied,

Are you comparing a top notch QB to a CB? You do realize the problem With that right?
Posted Image
0

#22 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,757
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 24 April 2013 - 12:45 PM

View Postazjetfan, on 24 April 2013 - 10:40 AM, said:

Are you comparing a top notch QB to a CB? You do realize the problem With that right?


did you stop reading at the snip? cause i go on to say

Quote

and yes i know those are all QBs so also

Adrian Peterson, Larry fitzgerald, Andre Johnson, Calvin Johnson, Asomougha, Etc all got special attention


and i'd say a top CB is more important then a top WR or RB
0

#23 User is offline   azjetfan Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,139
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheese Land Baby
  • Interests:Football, golf, banking and home improvements

  • NFL Team:

Posted 24 April 2013 - 12:47 PM

I would never think it is a good idea to give a player who plays less than half the snaps in a total game and only impacts his side of the field that large of a percentage of the total cap room. It would not matter how good he is. The Bucs were the only team willing to trade for him and sign him to that silly money and we still got the 13th pick for injured goods. That's pretty good in my book. What other team has successfully given a CB that kind of money and did well? Raiders? Nope... Eagles? Nope...... He is a CB. Probably the best in the league, but he is still a CB. Not the most important position on the team.
Posted Image
0

#24 User is offline   azjetfan Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,139
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheese Land Baby
  • Interests:Football, golf, banking and home improvements

  • NFL Team:

Posted 24 April 2013 - 12:49 PM

View PostJetsfan115, on 24 April 2013 - 12:45 PM, said:

did you stop reading at the snip? cause i go on to say



and i'd say a top CB is more important then a top WR or RB

But you did compare them. That's why I did that. Considering that the NFL is now protecting the QB and WRs so much I would disagree. HB I am with you.
Posted Image
0

#25 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,757
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 24 April 2013 - 02:36 PM

View Postazjetfan, on 24 April 2013 - 10:49 AM, said:

But you did compare them. That's why I did that. Considering that the NFL is now protecting the QB and WRs so much I would disagree. HB I am with you.


OK well Peterson blew his knee out and was due a contract. minnesota sheeled out huge money for him and made it known they wanted him there. we did teh opposite. Minn still has their star RB we have nothing
0

#26 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,757
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 24 April 2013 - 02:40 PM

View Postazjetfan, on 24 April 2013 - 10:47 AM, said:

I would never think it is a good idea to give a player who plays less than half the snaps in a total game and only impacts his side of the field that large of a percentage of the total cap room. It would not matter how good he is. The Bucs were the only team willing to trade for him and sign him to that silly money and we still got the 13th pick for injured goods. That's pretty good in my book. What other team has successfully given a CB that kind of money and did well? Raiders? Nope... Eagles? Nope...... He is a CB. Probably the best in the league, but he is still a CB. Not the most important position on the team.


he made up for the lack of any decent safeties, he never needed safety help which allowed us an extra pass rusher every play. having revis on the field was like playing with 12 men. and he played every snap on defense os how is it less then half?

and the 13th pick most liekly will never be clsoe to what revis is. lets say we score an amazing pass rusher and he gets 12 sacks his rookie year, then i'll say it wasn't a terrible deal. But what if we draft the next vernon gholston? then we gave revis away for nothing. alot rides on what idzik does with that pick TBH.

remember when we traded keyshawn and bellichek and had 4 1st round picks? we landed some good pciks too, penny was amazing when healthy, ellis and abe were great DEs and becht was a good blocking TE. but we never made a SB with them. keyshawn won one and belly won 3

rarely do trades like this work out.
0

#27 User is offline   azjetfan Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,139
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheese Land Baby
  • Interests:Football, golf, banking and home improvements

  • NFL Team:

Posted 24 April 2013 - 02:59 PM

View PostJetsfan115, on 24 April 2013 - 02:36 PM, said:

OK well Peterson blew his knee out and was due a contract. minnesota sheeled out huge money for him and made it known they wanted him there. we did teh opposite. Minn still has their star RB we have nothing

We do have something to show for it. 2 picks. Tampa will have to release him in 2 years and have nothing. When Milliner (sp?) is drafted @ 13 or later and he turns into a solid CB the Bucs will look like fools and Idzick will look better. Spending 13+% on a non QB is just stupid. History shows it.
Posted Image
0

#28 User is offline   azjetfan Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,139
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheese Land Baby
  • Interests:Football, golf, banking and home improvements

  • NFL Team:

Posted 24 April 2013 - 03:06 PM

View PostJetsfan115, on 24 April 2013 - 02:40 PM, said:

he made up for the lack of any decent safeties, he never needed safety help which allowed us an extra pass rusher every play. having revis on the field was like playing with 12 men. and he played every snap on defense os how is it less then half?



Probably truth to the saftey comment... But the other hand is we could not afford to have a pass rusher due to his contract.

Quote

and the 13th pick most liekly will never be clsoe to what revis is. lets say we score an amazing pass rusher and he gets 12 sacks his rookie year, then i'll say it wasn't a terrible deal. But what if we draft the next vernon gholston? then we gave revis away for nothing. alot rides on what idzik does with that pick TBH.


Thats your opinion and there is a valid concern. Keep in mind we had Revis for years and we did not win a SB either. Revis wanted to much money for a CB is what this comes down to. What if we had the cap space to sign Manning when he was a FA? Why tie so much money?
Posted Image
0

#29 User is offline   azjetfan Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,139
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheese Land Baby
  • Interests:Football, golf, banking and home improvements

  • NFL Team:

Posted 24 April 2013 - 03:11 PM

View PostJetsfan115, on 24 April 2013 - 02:36 PM, said:

OK well Peterson blew his knee out and was due a contract. minnesota sheeled out huge money for him and made it known they wanted him there. we did teh opposite. Minn still has their star RB we have nothing


You are comparing a guy who touches the ball 30+ times a game to a CB. Normally I would agree I would rather have a corner over a HB, But I would take Peterson over Revis in a heartbeat. Also using MN as an example is not he best. Bad team management.
Posted Image
0

#30 User is offline   MlorinczJ Icon

  • Drafted Rookie
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 172
  • Joined: 03-January 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toledo, OH

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 24 April 2013 - 03:59 PM

View PostJetsfan115, on 24 April 2013 - 03:36 PM, said:

OK well Peterson blew his knee out and was due a contract. minnesota sheeled out huge money for him and made it known they wanted him there. we did teh opposite. Minn still has their star RB we have nothing

Try doing just an iota of research, I'm pretty sure Peterson got payed way before blowing out his knee.

Peterson Article
"I thought he was good?!? If he prays when he scores. Everyone knew him for praying. That only can mean he scores :)"

Quote from my wife when I told her I liked Tebow, but that he sucks as a QB
0

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users