NYJetsFan.com Forums: Members Of Congress Urge Redskins To Change Name - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

ganggreen2003 Icon : (21 April 2015 - 07:52 PM) Week 5 Bye after the London Game against the Dolphags
NJAzrael71 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 09:17 AM) Rivers is likely going to Tennessee. Would LOVE to have him here but we likely won't make the trade. I'd easily give this year and next year
NJAzrael71 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 09:17 AM) 's first rounder for him
azjetfan Icon : (22 April 2015 - 11:03 AM) IMO that's a steep price. I would swap this years first and a conditional 1st next year. Assuming we make the AFC Championship. That would be a 28-32nd pick. Otherwise a second.
MikeGangGree... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 01:07 PM) Yes 2 1st is a lot
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 01:10 PM) draft is next week, pumped
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 03:02 PM) What are thoughts on getting a RB in round 1? McShay's newest mock has us taking Gurley at 6. I don't think we should take him that high, but if we trade down and he's available I'd love to snag him, ACL and all. He's got an unreal skill set that, once healthy, will translate readily to the NFL. We're not getting a QB this year without paying a king's ransom, and unless we pay a ransom for a top guy I say ignore QB. I don't want us to take a Hundley or Petty type in the 2nd or 3rd round when we need other pieces (edge rush, OL)
azjetfan Icon : (22 April 2015 - 03:09 PM) We can probably get Gordon in the second. I would pass at 6. If QB is not available a pass rusher will be. Our biggest needs are QB Pass rusher and Oline.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 03:34 PM) any thourghts on shane ray? i see a lot of mocks have us drafting him
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 04:35 PM) last one i seen had us taking cooper, a RB, and hundley for our 1st 3 picks. not thrilled about that
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 04:38 PM) I don't like Gordon much. Not much of a receiver or blocker, ball security issues, tries to bounce outside too much, stuffed frequently. Gurley is in a league of his own
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 04:39 PM) Ray is pretty highly regarded. I'm betting he, Dupree, and Gregory will be our best options as well as edge rushers at 6, but I think that's too high for any of them
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 04:43 PM) Personally love Cooper, I know WR isn't our biggest need but he may be the most NFL ready guy in the Draft. If we stick to the 6th pick and Fowler, Beasley, and Mariota are gone, Cooper is the guy to get. I'd even take him over Beasley
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 05:45 PM) i don't mind cooper. decker isn't number 1 IMO and marshall is expensive and getting old
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 05:45 PM) and we never draft a WR high
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 05:45 PM) but o-line and QB are huge needs. i wouldn't take o-line 6th overall, but i think our 2nd or 3rd should be o-line
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 05:46 PM) we need an OLB as well. if we don't land a QB i'd like to see OLB adn O-line with 2 of our top 3 picks
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 08:16 PM) I agree on Deck, not a true #1 and he's had a checkered history with injuries. Marshall has 2, maybe 3 productive years left, which is why Cooper is an option
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 08:17 PM) And I agree with you on edge rusher & OL being bigger needs, but there really isn't a lineman I'd take at 6
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 08:19 PM) So the way I see it, assuming Winston and Mariota are taken when we're at 6, that Fowler and Cooper are our best choices, and I'd be stunned if Fowler drops. I wouldn't be surprised (or upset) if we land Cooper
NJAzrael71 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 08:47 PM) Apparently Tennessee wanted both of Cleveland's #1's and their 2nd rounder to move up to the #2 spot to get Mariota. Still think two 1st rounders are too much for Rivers? He makes us instant contenders and if we make a deep playoff run, it would really be this year's 1st and what equates to basically a 2nd rounder next year.
If not, get Cooper in the 1st and then grab Hundley in the 2nd and O-line in the 3rd.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:05 PM) I wouldn't be upset with Cooper, hes a stud
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:06 PM) Not sure about Ray. Dupree is rising on the draft boards, ridiculously athletic for his size
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:07 PM) Dupree is 6'4 270 and has a amazing get off and runs a 4.5
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:09 PM) Problem is he doesn't have big sack numbers in college, I rather draft a productive guy high
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:09 PM) Vic Beasley is insanely athletic as well and was hugely productive in college, good bet is that Beasley will be a 10+ sack guy in the NFL
NJAzrael71 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:12 PM) Beasley should be a stud but he gets caught up hand fighting if he doesn't beat his guy quickly. He'll likely end up as an OLB but we'll see
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:15 PM) He'd be a good fit in our defense, because we could use that speed guy on the outside
Chadforpresi... Icon : (23 April 2015 - 06:27 AM) I'd love Rivers, but we should be able to get him without paying 2 first rounders
Chadforpresi... Icon : (23 April 2015 - 06:29 AM) Lot of buzz about Dupree going top 10, most mocks I see have us getting either Ray or Dupree at 6. I prefer Dupree, like you said insane athlete for his size
Chadforpresi... Icon : (23 April 2015 - 06:30 AM) I like Beasley as well but I have a strong feeling Washington will snag him. But he is a small dude, it'd be nice if he'd add some bulk (in Clemson reportedly played around 230)
Chaos Icon : (23 April 2015 - 10:11 AM) @ArifHasanNFL

.@LanceZierlein says on http://sports790.com that Shane Ray will need surgery on foot, 5 months recovery. "Could drop out of first"
Chaos Icon : (23 April 2015 - 10:14 AM) this should change up the top 10
Chadforpresi... Icon : (23 April 2015 - 12:16 PM) Damn that's big. If he drops out of round 1 that could be a massive bargain for whoever gets him round 2. Dupree now looks more like the edge rusher we'd get at 6
MikeGangGree... Icon : (24 April 2015 - 09:40 PM) TEH RANGERS
santana Icon : (24 April 2015 - 11:32 PM) TEH WIZ
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:57 AM) Teh Suarez
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:58 AM) Vic Beasley is all speed. No moves, no power. Straight up the field. Could have some big games, then nothing in the next
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:59 AM) If we don't get Mariota, we should be looking at Schreff or trading down, IMO.
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:59 AM) A lot of good edge rushers in this draft... I wouldn't want to take Dupree that high.
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 07:00 AM) Until next time fellas!
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 01:19 PM) Helloooooooooo
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 01:19 PM) Bueller
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 01:33 PM) Manish says the Jets should trade down and draft Andrus Peat round 1
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 04:39 PM) Even an idiot can say something that's right every now and then
Resize Shouts Area

  • (5 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

Members Of Congress Urge Redskins To Change Name

#1 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,753
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 28 May 2013 - 05:16 PM

Quote

Members of Congress urge Redskins to change name
May
28
5/28/2013 3:47:39 PM
Share on email Share on print Share on twitter Share on facebook Share on myspace Share on stumbleupon Share on digg | More Sharing ServicesMore

Ten members of Congress recently sent Washington Redskins owner Daniel Snyder a letter, urging him to change the name of the team, according to a news release issued Tuesday by the office of Eni F.H. Faleomavaega, congressman for the American Samoa, Mike Jones of the Washington Post reports.

Joining Faleomavaega in the effort were fellow representatives and co-chairs of the Congressional Native American Caucus: Tom Cole (Oklahoma) and Betty McCollum (Minnesota) as well as Raul M. Grijalva (Arizona), Gwen Moore (Wisconsin), Michael M. Honda (California), Donna M. Christensen (Virginia Islands), Zoe Lofgren and Barbara Lee (both of California) and Eleanor Holmes Norton of the District.

The representatives sent similar letters to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and FedEx President and CEO Frederick Smith, and the owners of the NFL’s 31 other franchises.
In the letter, the representatives argued “Native Americans throughout the country consider the ‘R-word’ a racial, derogatory slur akin to the ‘N-word’ among African Americans or the ‘W-word’ among Latinos.

“Such offensive epithets would no doubt draw wide-spread disapproval among the NFL’s fan base. Yet the national coverage of Washington’s NFL football team profits from a term that is equally disparaging to Native Americans.”

Later in the letter, the members of Congress said, “In this day and age, it is imperative that you uphold your moral responsibility to disavow the usage of racial slurs. The usage of the [“R-word”] is especially harmful to Native American youth, tending to lower their sense of dignity and self-esteem. It also diminishes feelings of community worth among the Native American tribes and dampens the aspirations of their people.”

A Redskins spokesman said the team has no comment on the letter.


F U congress
Get it done MT
Posted Image
0

#2 User is offline   ROBJETS Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,467
  • Joined: 29-September 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 28 May 2013 - 06:35 PM

While I think the Redskins name is cool and they have a long history from what Ive read the name Redskins is highly offensive towards the Indian nation. There are other teams that use Indian type names but few of them are considered offensive. Before I knew it was considered offensive I was against the idea of them changing the name.

So if the name is indeed offensive then it should be changed to something non offensive. Indians were here before any of the rest of us and they should have the right to be upset if the name is truly offensive.

Heck the Bullets were changed to the Wizards simply because of all the murders in D.C. everyday and I along with a lot of people thought it was stupid to change the name simply because of that even though I understand why.That said the Bullets was a cool name and the name alone sold and brought in revenue that the Wizards name doesn't. The Wizards is a crappy name imo and I'm sure most would agree.

The Indian nation doesn't have the backing a lot of other minorities do which is why the name hasn't been changed yet. If the name was offensive to Muslims,African American,Spanish, or any other minority with a huge backing it would have been changed long a go.


I dont agree with the Indian nation profiting off names used like Braves, Indians,etc. but if the name is offensive toward a people then it should be changed. We are a country of many different ethnic origins, and religions.
0

#3 User is offline   azjetfan Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,132
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheese Land Baby
  • Interests:Football, golf, banking and home improvements

  • NFL Team:

Posted 28 May 2013 - 06:56 PM

What is the W word among Latinos?
Posted Image
0

#4 User is offline   MikeGangGreenFan2 Icon

  • THE KNICKS
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,718
  • Joined: 08-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida.used to live in NY.
  • Interests:playing football
    watching the yankees WIN
    playing video games
    and a shit load of other things.

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 28 May 2013 - 07:56 PM

Nice to see that congress has nothing better to worry about
0

#5 User is offline   Mr_Jet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,314
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

  • NFL Team:

Posted 28 May 2013 - 07:57 PM



If the NBA can change the Bullets to the Wizards, the NFL can get rid of the Redskins team name. There is no good reason in 2013 to call a team the Redskins (there wasn't a good reason in the 1930s either). Just stop and think about that name for a moment. The Redskins? We all know if they where called the Washington Blackskins or Whiteskins, their name would have been changed decades ago.


Not in a million years would a major corporation like the NFL let one of their franchises have a mascot like these.
Posted ImagePosted Image

View PostFlyHiJets, on 01 June 2013 - 08:35 PM, said:

You're the scumbag that thinks everyone should kiss the as$es of a bunch of criminals but I'm a dumbass. Yeah okay douchebag. Go give some illegal wetback or Revis another blowjob. But then again.....don't you live in an entirely different country but yet think you can tell us how to live? Go fvck yourself little boy. You're likely still living with mommy & daddy. Pu$$y.


View Postazjetfan, on 02 July 2014 - 03:36 PM, said:

There are a few things I have realized about Mr. Jet over a few topics.

1) He is a racist. By constantly using race as a battling tool.
2) He is an extreme Liberal. If you are on either extreme you are probabaly more wrong than right.
3) He is one of those people who will never admit fault, error or defeat.
4)His life sucks and he takes it out on people who don't share in his views.
0

#6 User is offline   Mr_Jet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,314
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

  • NFL Team:

Posted 28 May 2013 - 08:04 PM

View PostMikeGangGreenFan2, on 28 May 2013 - 08:56 PM, said:

Nice to see that congress has nothing better to worry about



Yes because as we all know drafting a letter and sending it out takes up a lot of time. A member of one person's staff probably wrote it and the others just added their names to it.

Congress is in recess this week.

View PostFlyHiJets, on 01 June 2013 - 08:35 PM, said:

You're the scumbag that thinks everyone should kiss the as$es of a bunch of criminals but I'm a dumbass. Yeah okay douchebag. Go give some illegal wetback or Revis another blowjob. But then again.....don't you live in an entirely different country but yet think you can tell us how to live? Go fvck yourself little boy. You're likely still living with mommy & daddy. Pu$$y.


View Postazjetfan, on 02 July 2014 - 03:36 PM, said:

There are a few things I have realized about Mr. Jet over a few topics.

1) He is a racist. By constantly using race as a battling tool.
2) He is an extreme Liberal. If you are on either extreme you are probabaly more wrong than right.
3) He is one of those people who will never admit fault, error or defeat.
4)His life sucks and he takes it out on people who don't share in his views.
0

#7 User is offline   azjetfan Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,132
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheese Land Baby
  • Interests:Football, golf, banking and home improvements

  • NFL Team:

Posted 28 May 2013 - 10:11 PM

View PostMr_Jet, on 28 May 2013 - 07:57 PM, said:



If the NBA can change the Bullets to the Wizards, the NFL can get rid of the Redskins team name. There is no good reason in 2013 to call a team the Redskins (there wasn't a good reason in the 1930s either). Just stop and think about that name for a moment. The Redskins? We all know if they where called the Washington Blackskins or Whiteskins, their name would have been changed decades ago.


Not in a million years would a major corporation like the NFL let one of their franchises have a mascot like these.
Posted ImagePosted Image

I am in for the white skins. How about Crackers? Gringos? Honkey?
Posted Image
0

#8 User is offline   TheFuture Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,998
  • Joined: 14-November 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:binghamton new york

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 28 May 2013 - 10:50 PM

View Postazjetfan, on 28 May 2013 - 07:56 PM, said:

What is the W word among Latinos?


Glad I'm not the only one to wonder what it is
"If you take a swipe at one of ours, we'll take a swipe at two of yours" -Rex Ryan
0

#9 User is offline   arizonaJETSfan Icon

  • Pro Bowl
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 512
  • Joined: 12-September 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Devils Crotch, AZ

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 12:13 AM

View PostTheFuture, on 28 May 2013 - 09:50 PM, said:

Glad I'm not the only one to wonder what it is


I COULD be wrong, but the ONLY thing I can think of is Wet Back. IF that is the word/phrase that is offensive...the NFL are MORONS! That is a racial slur toward Mexicans because of the crossing the rio grand. So I GUESS all of us are now Mexican? I think it would have been more appropriate to say SPICK! course spick comes from when ALL hispanics of various Latin countries came to the US & naturally the 1st line they learned in English was I don't speak English, which with a spanish accent would be "I no spick english" but hey....what do I know ....
Posted Image
0

#10 User is offline   Mr_Jet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,314
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

  • NFL Team:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 12:21 AM

View Postazjetfan, on 28 May 2013 - 07:56 PM, said:

What is the W word among Latinos?



View PostTheFuture, on 28 May 2013 - 11:50 PM, said:

Glad I'm not the only one to wonder what it is


When SOME Latinos immigrate into the U.S. illegally they cross through the Rio Grande. That water makes certain parts of their bodies wet. Like their backs for example.

View PostFlyHiJets, on 01 June 2013 - 08:35 PM, said:

You're the scumbag that thinks everyone should kiss the as$es of a bunch of criminals but I'm a dumbass. Yeah okay douchebag. Go give some illegal wetback or Revis another blowjob. But then again.....don't you live in an entirely different country but yet think you can tell us how to live? Go fvck yourself little boy. You're likely still living with mommy & daddy. Pu$$y.


View Postazjetfan, on 02 July 2014 - 03:36 PM, said:

There are a few things I have realized about Mr. Jet over a few topics.

1) He is a racist. By constantly using race as a battling tool.
2) He is an extreme Liberal. If you are on either extreme you are probabaly more wrong than right.
3) He is one of those people who will never admit fault, error or defeat.
4)His life sucks and he takes it out on people who don't share in his views.
0

#11 User is offline   Mr_Jet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,314
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

  • NFL Team:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 12:47 AM

View Postazjetfan, on 28 May 2013 - 11:11 PM, said:

I am in for the white skins. How about Crackers? Gringos? Honkey?


No they already have a name. They're called the Owners.

A billionaire old white man, making money off of the work of millionaire young black men, who wear uniforms and sell merchandise made by Asian slave labor, that demean savages redskins Indians Native-Americans the indigenous people of America.

I'm so glad our mascot is a man person made machine.

View PostFlyHiJets, on 01 June 2013 - 08:35 PM, said:

You're the scumbag that thinks everyone should kiss the as$es of a bunch of criminals but I'm a dumbass. Yeah okay douchebag. Go give some illegal wetback or Revis another blowjob. But then again.....don't you live in an entirely different country but yet think you can tell us how to live? Go fvck yourself little boy. You're likely still living with mommy & daddy. Pu$$y.


View Postazjetfan, on 02 July 2014 - 03:36 PM, said:

There are a few things I have realized about Mr. Jet over a few topics.

1) He is a racist. By constantly using race as a battling tool.
2) He is an extreme Liberal. If you are on either extreme you are probabaly more wrong than right.
3) He is one of those people who will never admit fault, error or defeat.
4)His life sucks and he takes it out on people who don't share in his views.
0

#12 User is offline   santana Icon

  • I'm batman
  • Icon
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 7,928
  • Joined: 03-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington DC
  • Interests:Keeping this place from breaking... and titties.

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 01:03 AM

Redskins were the last nfl team to integrate and accept a black player
Snyder is a charlatan and licensed everything. He will never sway with this he's spent too much putting his brand on everything.
Nyjetsfan.com Jets Fan Forum and Chat
0

#13 User is offline   HurricaneJet32 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,703
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Location:New York

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 07:45 AM

View PostJetsfan115, on 28 May 2013 - 06:16 PM, said:

F U congress


Really? I mean, really!?

Even if you don't think the name is offensive and doesn't need to be changed...you're really going to be mad at "congress" for this?

Really!?...
Posted Image
0

#14 User is offline   santana Icon

  • I'm batman
  • Icon
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 7,928
  • Joined: 03-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington DC
  • Interests:Keeping this place from breaking... and titties.

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 08:44 AM

View PostHurricaneJet32, on 29 May 2013 - 08:45 AM, said:

Really? I mean, really!?

Even if you don't think the name is offensive and doesn't need to be changed...you're really going to be mad at "congress" for this?

Really!?...


A lot of people are annoyed that congress is bothering with the nfl at all when they should be focused on the budget or something
Nyjetsfan.com Jets Fan Forum and Chat
0

#15 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,489
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 09:00 AM

Elected officials have no say in how a private corporation runs its business as long as it's doing so within the law. If the term was offensive to the point that it was detrimental to the team, the ownership wouldn't need anyone to tell them to change the name, they'd do so without any input from congress. The fact that the Redskins are the 2nd most valuable NFL franchise and the 3rd most valuable North American sports franchise lends me to believe that their brand is pretty strong. I hope Snyder never changes the name. All this political peanut gallery sensitivity bullshit is really f***ing annoying.
0

#16 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,489
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 09:04 AM

View PostHurricaneJet32, on 29 May 2013 - 08:45 AM, said:

Even if you don't think the name is offensive and doesn't need to be changed...you're really going to be mad at "congress" for this?


Yes. Not because it's "congress" per se, but because this is another example of the ever expanding bureaucracy. Congress, nor any other government entity should have an opinion on how a private business markets itself. SUre, the individuals working in those government entitities can have their own opinions, but they should be that... individual and not coming from "congress". As long as an enterprise is running a lawful business, congress should not glance in their direction.
0

#17 User is offline   HurricaneJet32 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,703
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Location:New York

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 09:55 AM

View PostSecondHandJets, on 29 May 2013 - 10:04 AM, said:

Yes. Not because it's "congress" per se, but because this is another example of the ever expanding bureaucracy. Congress, nor any other government entity should have an opinion on how a private business markets itself. SUre, the individuals working in those government entitities can have their own opinions, but they should be that... individual and not coming from "congress". As long as an enterprise is running a lawful business, congress should not glance in their direction.


Yeah, well, that's all it is...a few individuals from congress (not the entire entity) expressing an opinion. They're not forcing anyone to do anything.

And stop with garbage about "spend more time fixing the economy" crap...this takes a few seconds out of their day. If you want to fix the economy get rid of the party system and it's ridiculous kindergarten gang mentality.
Posted Image
0

#18 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,753
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 10:27 AM

View PostHurricaneJet32, on 29 May 2013 - 05:45 AM, said:

Really? I mean, really!?

Even if you don't think the name is offensive and doesn't need to be changed...you're really going to be mad at "congress" for this?

Really!?...



becuase of this..

View Postsantana, on 29 May 2013 - 06:44 AM, said:

A lot of people are annoyed that congress is bothering with the nfl at all when they should be focused on the budget or something


exactly, they have more important crap to deal with then the name of a sports franchise
Get it done MT
Posted Image
0

#19 User is offline   azjetfan Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,132
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheese Land Baby
  • Interests:Football, golf, banking and home improvements

  • NFL Team:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 10:46 AM

I still want a team names the Whiteskins.
Posted Image
0

#20 User is offline   azjetfan Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,132
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheese Land Baby
  • Interests:Football, golf, banking and home improvements

  • NFL Team:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 10:47 AM

Or maybe the Micks™
Posted Image
0

  • (5 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users