NYJetsFan.com Forums: Members Of Congress Urge Redskins To Change Name - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

Jets start voluntary offseason programs today
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (21 April 2014 - 05:49 PM) I'm watching cops lol
Jetsman05 Icon : (21 April 2014 - 05:57 PM) yo
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (21 April 2014 - 05:57 PM) YO!
Jetsman05 Icon : (21 April 2014 - 05:58 PM) LFC could win the league on my birthday
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (21 April 2014 - 06:06 PM) zzzzzzzz
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (21 April 2014 - 06:06 PM) I might go to LFC/MCFC this summer
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (21 April 2014 - 06:06 PM) contemplating between that and Arsenal v. Red Bulls
Jetsman05 Icon : (21 April 2014 - 06:16 PM) ill be at LFC/Olympiakos in Chicago and then LFC/Milan in Charlotte not coming to the NY game tho
santana Icon : (21 April 2014 - 06:44 PM) http://i.imgur.com/Nw1vwg1.gif
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 11:27 AM) ESPN: boston strong
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 01:06 PM) uefa....time
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 02:37 PM) EL CHOLO
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 02:48 PM) *high 5*
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 03:47 PM) High fives are the best
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 03:47 PM) dat Chelsea tight butt hole
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 03:48 PM) 0-0
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:48 PM) whatever that means
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:59 PM) Some talk that Dennard might slide to round 2 now
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:00 PM) Roby and Fuller are rising.
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:00 PM) Roby absolute physical freak but really inconsistent as a player
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:01 PM) loved him going into school but never grew into the player i thought he would become
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:01 PM) I don't want Roby, afraid we take him
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:01 PM) f***ing draft should be this week, not 2 weeks from now
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:02 PM) I rather go get a CB like Phillip Gaines in round 3.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:02 PM) 1-Odell Beckham Jr WR, 2-Jace Amaro TE, 3-Phillip Gaines CB.
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:04 PM) Where is Marcus Roberson being projected
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:05 PM) round 2 I think
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 04:06 PM) he'll be a solid pro
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 04:18 PM) solid pro
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 04:19 PM) boston. strong.
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:14 PM) you're a clown
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:14 PM) just for the record
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:27 PM) FIRE RAUL
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:30 PM) agreed
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:30 PM) EJ > Raul
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:38 PM) lmao
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:38 PM) I wouldn't go that far
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:39 PM) true
Jetsman05 Icon : (Yesterday, 06:39 PM) but its closer by the day
HarlemHxC814 Icon : (Yesterday, 08:13 PM) LET'S GO RANGERS!
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 08:51 PM) Boo rangers
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 08:51 PM) boo the Knicks
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 08:51 PM) Let's go wizards!
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 08:52 PM) SANTANA DESERVES BETTER
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 08:56 PM) Just landed in Reagan jumping on the wizards bandwagon taxi right out the gate
Resize Shouts Area

  • (5 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

Members Of Congress Urge Redskins To Change Name

#1 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,538
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 28 May 2013 - 05:16 PM

Quote

Members of Congress urge Redskins to change name
May
28
5/28/2013 3:47:39 PM
Share on email Share on print Share on twitter Share on facebook Share on myspace Share on stumbleupon Share on digg | More Sharing ServicesMore

Ten members of Congress recently sent Washington Redskins owner Daniel Snyder a letter, urging him to change the name of the team, according to a news release issued Tuesday by the office of Eni F.H. Faleomavaega, congressman for the American Samoa, Mike Jones of the Washington Post reports.

Joining Faleomavaega in the effort were fellow representatives and co-chairs of the Congressional Native American Caucus: Tom Cole (Oklahoma) and Betty McCollum (Minnesota) as well as Raul M. Grijalva (Arizona), Gwen Moore (Wisconsin), Michael M. Honda (California), Donna M. Christensen (Virginia Islands), Zoe Lofgren and Barbara Lee (both of California) and Eleanor Holmes Norton of the District.

The representatives sent similar letters to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and FedEx President and CEO Frederick Smith, and the owners of the NFL’s 31 other franchises.
In the letter, the representatives argued “Native Americans throughout the country consider the ‘R-word’ a racial, derogatory slur akin to the ‘N-word’ among African Americans or the ‘W-word’ among Latinos.

“Such offensive epithets would no doubt draw wide-spread disapproval among the NFL’s fan base. Yet the national coverage of Washington’s NFL football team profits from a term that is equally disparaging to Native Americans.”

Later in the letter, the members of Congress said, “In this day and age, it is imperative that you uphold your moral responsibility to disavow the usage of racial slurs. The usage of the [“R-word”] is especially harmful to Native American youth, tending to lower their sense of dignity and self-esteem. It also diminishes feelings of community worth among the Native American tribes and dampens the aspirations of their people.”

A Redskins spokesman said the team has no comment on the letter.


F U congress
Get it done MT
Posted Image
0

#2 User is offline   ROBJETS Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,357
  • Joined: 29-September 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 28 May 2013 - 06:35 PM

While I think the Redskins name is cool and they have a long history from what Ive read the name Redskins is highly offensive towards the Indian nation. There are other teams that use Indian type names but few of them are considered offensive. Before I knew it was considered offensive I was against the idea of them changing the name.

So if the name is indeed offensive then it should be changed to something non offensive. Indians were here before any of the rest of us and they should have the right to be upset if the name is truly offensive.

Heck the Bullets were changed to the Wizards simply because of all the murders in D.C. everyday and I along with a lot of people thought it was stupid to change the name simply because of that even though I understand why.That said the Bullets was a cool name and the name alone sold and brought in revenue that the Wizards name doesn't. The Wizards is a crappy name imo and I'm sure most would agree.

The Indian nation doesn't have the backing a lot of other minorities do which is why the name hasn't been changed yet. If the name was offensive to Muslims,African American,Spanish, or any other minority with a huge backing it would have been changed long a go.


I dont agree with the Indian nation profiting off names used like Braves, Indians,etc. but if the name is offensive toward a people then it should be changed. We are a country of many different ethnic origins, and religions.
0

#3 User is offline   azjetfan Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,763
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheese Land Baby
  • Interests:Football, golf, banking and home improvements

  • NFL Team:

Posted 28 May 2013 - 06:56 PM

What is the W word among Latinos?
Posted Image
0

#4 User is offline   MikeGangGreenFan2 Icon

  • THE KNICKS
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,619
  • Joined: 08-April 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida.used to live in NY.
  • Interests:playing football
    watching the yankees WIN
    playing video games
    and a shit load of other things.

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 28 May 2013 - 07:56 PM

Nice to see that congress has nothing better to worry about
Posted Image Posted Image
0

#5 User is offline   Mr_Jet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,142
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

  • NFL Team:

Posted 28 May 2013 - 07:57 PM



If the NBA can change the Bullets to the Wizards, the NFL can get rid of the Redskins team name. There is no good reason in 2013 to call a team the Redskins (there wasn't a good reason in the 1930s either). Just stop and think about that name for a moment. The Redskins? We all know if they where called the Washington Blackskins or Whiteskins, their name would have been changed decades ago.


Not in a million years would a major corporation like the NFL let one of their franchises have a mascot like these.
Posted ImagePosted Image
Posted Image
New York Jets
Super Bowl III Champions

Posted Image
Los Angeles Lakers
16-times NBA World Champions

1949, 1950, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1972, 1980, 1982, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2009, 2010

View PostFlyHiJets, on 01 June 2013 - 08:35 PM, said:

You're the scumbag that thinks everyone should kiss the as$es of a bunch of criminals but I'm a dumbass. Yeah okay douchebag. Go give some illegal wetback or Revis another blowjob. But then again.....don't you live in an entirely different country but yet think you can tell us how to live? Go fvck yourself little boy. You're likely still living with mommy & daddy. Pu$$y.
0

#6 User is offline   Mr_Jet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,142
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

  • NFL Team:

Posted 28 May 2013 - 08:04 PM

View PostMikeGangGreenFan2, on 28 May 2013 - 08:56 PM, said:

Nice to see that congress has nothing better to worry about



Yes because as we all know drafting a letter and sending it out takes up a lot of time. A member of one person's staff probably wrote it and the others just added their names to it.

Congress is in recess this week.
Posted Image
New York Jets
Super Bowl III Champions

Posted Image
Los Angeles Lakers
16-times NBA World Champions

1949, 1950, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1972, 1980, 1982, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2009, 2010

View PostFlyHiJets, on 01 June 2013 - 08:35 PM, said:

You're the scumbag that thinks everyone should kiss the as$es of a bunch of criminals but I'm a dumbass. Yeah okay douchebag. Go give some illegal wetback or Revis another blowjob. But then again.....don't you live in an entirely different country but yet think you can tell us how to live? Go fvck yourself little boy. You're likely still living with mommy & daddy. Pu$$y.
0

#7 User is offline   azjetfan Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,763
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheese Land Baby
  • Interests:Football, golf, banking and home improvements

  • NFL Team:

Posted 28 May 2013 - 10:11 PM

View PostMr_Jet, on 28 May 2013 - 07:57 PM, said:



If the NBA can change the Bullets to the Wizards, the NFL can get rid of the Redskins team name. There is no good reason in 2013 to call a team the Redskins (there wasn't a good reason in the 1930s either). Just stop and think about that name for a moment. The Redskins? We all know if they where called the Washington Blackskins or Whiteskins, their name would have been changed decades ago.


Not in a million years would a major corporation like the NFL let one of their franchises have a mascot like these.
Posted ImagePosted Image

I am in for the white skins. How about Crackers? Gringos? Honkey?
Posted Image
0

#8 User is offline   TheFuture Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,997
  • Joined: 14-November 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:binghamton new york

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 28 May 2013 - 10:50 PM

View Postazjetfan, on 28 May 2013 - 07:56 PM, said:

What is the W word among Latinos?


Glad I'm not the only one to wonder what it is
"If you take a swipe at one of ours, we'll take a swipe at two of yours" -Rex Ryan
0

#9 User is offline   arizonaJETSfan Icon

  • Pro Bowl
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 510
  • Joined: 12-September 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Devils Crotch, AZ

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 12:13 AM

View PostTheFuture, on 28 May 2013 - 09:50 PM, said:

Glad I'm not the only one to wonder what it is


I COULD be wrong, but the ONLY thing I can think of is Wet Back. IF that is the word/phrase that is offensive...the NFL are MORONS! That is a racial slur toward Mexicans because of the crossing the rio grand. So I GUESS all of us are now Mexican? I think it would have been more appropriate to say SPICK! course spick comes from when ALL hispanics of various Latin countries came to the US & naturally the 1st line they learned in English was I don't speak English, which with a spanish accent would be "I no spick english" but hey....what do I know ....
Posted Image
0

#10 User is offline   Mr_Jet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,142
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

  • NFL Team:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 12:21 AM

View Postazjetfan, on 28 May 2013 - 07:56 PM, said:

What is the W word among Latinos?



View PostTheFuture, on 28 May 2013 - 11:50 PM, said:

Glad I'm not the only one to wonder what it is


When SOME Latinos immigrate into the U.S. illegally they cross through the Rio Grande. That water makes certain parts of their bodies wet. Like their backs for example.
Posted Image
New York Jets
Super Bowl III Champions

Posted Image
Los Angeles Lakers
16-times NBA World Champions

1949, 1950, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1972, 1980, 1982, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2009, 2010

View PostFlyHiJets, on 01 June 2013 - 08:35 PM, said:

You're the scumbag that thinks everyone should kiss the as$es of a bunch of criminals but I'm a dumbass. Yeah okay douchebag. Go give some illegal wetback or Revis another blowjob. But then again.....don't you live in an entirely different country but yet think you can tell us how to live? Go fvck yourself little boy. You're likely still living with mommy & daddy. Pu$$y.
0

#11 User is offline   Mr_Jet Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,142
  • Joined: 31-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

  • NFL Team:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 12:47 AM

View Postazjetfan, on 28 May 2013 - 11:11 PM, said:

I am in for the white skins. How about Crackers? Gringos? Honkey?


No they already have a name. They're called the Owners.

A billionaire old white man, making money off of the work of millionaire young black men, who wear uniforms and sell merchandise made by Asian slave labor, that demean savages redskins Indians Native-Americans the indigenous people of America.

I'm so glad our mascot is a man person made machine.
Posted Image
New York Jets
Super Bowl III Champions

Posted Image
Los Angeles Lakers
16-times NBA World Champions

1949, 1950, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1972, 1980, 1982, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2009, 2010

View PostFlyHiJets, on 01 June 2013 - 08:35 PM, said:

You're the scumbag that thinks everyone should kiss the as$es of a bunch of criminals but I'm a dumbass. Yeah okay douchebag. Go give some illegal wetback or Revis another blowjob. But then again.....don't you live in an entirely different country but yet think you can tell us how to live? Go fvck yourself little boy. You're likely still living with mommy & daddy. Pu$$y.
0

#12 User is offline   santana Icon

  • I'm batman
  • Icon
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 7,731
  • Joined: 03-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington DC
  • Interests:Keeping this place from breaking... and titties.

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 01:03 AM

Redskins were the last nfl team to integrate and accept a black player
Snyder is a charlatan and licensed everything. He will never sway with this he's spent too much putting his brand on everything.
Posted Image
Damn it huevos rancheros move out the way!
0

#13 User is offline   HurricaneJet32 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,693
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Location:New York

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 07:45 AM

View PostJetsfan115, on 28 May 2013 - 06:16 PM, said:

F U congress


Really? I mean, really!?

Even if you don't think the name is offensive and doesn't need to be changed...you're really going to be mad at "congress" for this?

Really!?...
Posted Image
0

#14 User is offline   santana Icon

  • I'm batman
  • Icon
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 7,731
  • Joined: 03-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington DC
  • Interests:Keeping this place from breaking... and titties.

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 08:44 AM

View PostHurricaneJet32, on 29 May 2013 - 08:45 AM, said:

Really? I mean, really!?

Even if you don't think the name is offensive and doesn't need to be changed...you're really going to be mad at "congress" for this?

Really!?...


A lot of people are annoyed that congress is bothering with the nfl at all when they should be focused on the budget or something
Posted Image
Damn it huevos rancheros move out the way!
0

#15 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,449
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 09:00 AM

Elected officials have no say in how a private corporation runs its business as long as it's doing so within the law. If the term was offensive to the point that it was detrimental to the team, the ownership wouldn't need anyone to tell them to change the name, they'd do so without any input from congress. The fact that the Redskins are the 2nd most valuable NFL franchise and the 3rd most valuable North American sports franchise lends me to believe that their brand is pretty strong. I hope Snyder never changes the name. All this political peanut gallery sensitivity bullshit is really f***ing annoying.
0

#16 User is offline   SecondHandJets Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,449
  • Joined: 28-November 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 09:04 AM

View PostHurricaneJet32, on 29 May 2013 - 08:45 AM, said:

Even if you don't think the name is offensive and doesn't need to be changed...you're really going to be mad at "congress" for this?


Yes. Not because it's "congress" per se, but because this is another example of the ever expanding bureaucracy. Congress, nor any other government entity should have an opinion on how a private business markets itself. SUre, the individuals working in those government entitities can have their own opinions, but they should be that... individual and not coming from "congress". As long as an enterprise is running a lawful business, congress should not glance in their direction.
0

#17 User is offline   HurricaneJet32 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,693
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Location:New York

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 09:55 AM

View PostSecondHandJets, on 29 May 2013 - 10:04 AM, said:

Yes. Not because it's "congress" per se, but because this is another example of the ever expanding bureaucracy. Congress, nor any other government entity should have an opinion on how a private business markets itself. SUre, the individuals working in those government entitities can have their own opinions, but they should be that... individual and not coming from "congress". As long as an enterprise is running a lawful business, congress should not glance in their direction.


Yeah, well, that's all it is...a few individuals from congress (not the entire entity) expressing an opinion. They're not forcing anyone to do anything.

And stop with garbage about "spend more time fixing the economy" crap...this takes a few seconds out of their day. If you want to fix the economy get rid of the party system and it's ridiculous kindergarten gang mentality.
Posted Image
0

#18 User is offline   Jetsfan115 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 23,538
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 10:27 AM

View PostHurricaneJet32, on 29 May 2013 - 05:45 AM, said:

Really? I mean, really!?

Even if you don't think the name is offensive and doesn't need to be changed...you're really going to be mad at "congress" for this?

Really!?...



becuase of this..

View Postsantana, on 29 May 2013 - 06:44 AM, said:

A lot of people are annoyed that congress is bothering with the nfl at all when they should be focused on the budget or something


exactly, they have more important crap to deal with then the name of a sports franchise
Get it done MT
Posted Image
0

#19 User is offline   azjetfan Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,763
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheese Land Baby
  • Interests:Football, golf, banking and home improvements

  • NFL Team:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 10:46 AM

I still want a team names the Whiteskins.
Posted Image
0

#20 User is offline   azjetfan Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,763
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheese Land Baby
  • Interests:Football, golf, banking and home improvements

  • NFL Team:

Posted 29 May 2013 - 10:47 AM

Or maybe the Micks™
Posted Image
0

  • (5 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users