NYJetsFan.com Forums: Jets Qb Shuffle - Vick In, Sanchez Out - NYJetsFan.com Forums

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

azjetfan Icon : (21 April 2015 - 09:52 AM) He is a good QB and I would love to have him. However IMO our 6 is not good value for us. Not to mention if he hates the idea of LA what is he going to think of NY? Contract situation would have to be worked out prior to trade as well. Extreme long shot to land Rivers. My money says we are more likely to land Brees.
azjetfan Icon : (21 April 2015 - 09:53 AM) which is still a very long shot
Chaos Icon : (21 April 2015 - 10:46 AM) he may just hate ownership. LT's comments yesterday was interesting.
Chaos Icon : (21 April 2015 - 10:47 AM) “I personally don’t think so,” Tomlinson said. “I really think this is a situation where Philip Rivers wants to move on. The reason why I think that and the reason why I feel like that is the Chargers have already approached Philip about doing another contract and he declined it. He doesn’t want anything to do with it; he didn’t even want to talk about another contract with the San Diego Chargers. That tells me that he’s thinking about moving on.”

“You never want to trade your franchise quarterback,” Tomlinson said, “that’s never the case. However, in this situation they might have no choice but to do so because I don’t know if Philip [Rivers] wants to be there anymore. I think he’s lost confidence in the organization. He’s seeing a lot of changes going on and the L.A. thing is valid; him not wanting to go to L.A., that is very valid, I can see that. So no, it doesn’t make sense to move on from Philip because he’s a franchise quarterback and he still has three to four very good years left.”
Chaos Icon : (21 April 2015 - 10:47 AM) missed the LA line. nvm. guess that is a legit concern.
Mr_Jet Icon : (21 April 2015 - 03:57 PM) He doesn't want to play for a franchise based in Los Angeles, but he'd be okay with playing for one based in New York City?
azjetfan Icon : (21 April 2015 - 04:28 PM) That's the point we have all been making.
MikeGangGree... Icon : (21 April 2015 - 07:05 PM) Jets vs colts Monday night week2
MikeGangGree... Icon : (21 April 2015 - 07:09 PM) Jets open at home against the browns
ganggreen2003 Icon : (21 April 2015 - 07:52 PM) Week 5 Bye after the London Game against the Dolphags
NJAzrael71 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 09:17 AM) Rivers is likely going to Tennessee. Would LOVE to have him here but we likely won't make the trade. I'd easily give this year and next year
NJAzrael71 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 09:17 AM) 's first rounder for him
azjetfan Icon : (22 April 2015 - 11:03 AM) IMO that's a steep price. I would swap this years first and a conditional 1st next year. Assuming we make the AFC Championship. That would be a 28-32nd pick. Otherwise a second.
MikeGangGree... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 01:07 PM) Yes 2 1st is a lot
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 01:10 PM) draft is next week, pumped
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 03:02 PM) What are thoughts on getting a RB in round 1? McShay's newest mock has us taking Gurley at 6. I don't think we should take him that high, but if we trade down and he's available I'd love to snag him, ACL and all. He's got an unreal skill set that, once healthy, will translate readily to the NFL. We're not getting a QB this year without paying a king's ransom, and unless we pay a ransom for a top guy I say ignore QB. I don't want us to take a Hundley or Petty type in the 2nd or 3rd round when we need other pieces (edge rush, OL)
azjetfan Icon : (22 April 2015 - 03:09 PM) We can probably get Gordon in the second. I would pass at 6. If QB is not available a pass rusher will be. Our biggest needs are QB Pass rusher and Oline.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 03:34 PM) any thourghts on shane ray? i see a lot of mocks have us drafting him
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 04:35 PM) last one i seen had us taking cooper, a RB, and hundley for our 1st 3 picks. not thrilled about that
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 04:38 PM) I don't like Gordon much. Not much of a receiver or blocker, ball security issues, tries to bounce outside too much, stuffed frequently. Gurley is in a league of his own
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 04:39 PM) Ray is pretty highly regarded. I'm betting he, Dupree, and Gregory will be our best options as well as edge rushers at 6, but I think that's too high for any of them
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 04:43 PM) Personally love Cooper, I know WR isn't our biggest need but he may be the most NFL ready guy in the Draft. If we stick to the 6th pick and Fowler, Beasley, and Mariota are gone, Cooper is the guy to get. I'd even take him over Beasley
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 05:45 PM) i don't mind cooper. decker isn't number 1 IMO and marshall is expensive and getting old
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 05:45 PM) and we never draft a WR high
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 05:45 PM) but o-line and QB are huge needs. i wouldn't take o-line 6th overall, but i think our 2nd or 3rd should be o-line
Jetsfan115 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 05:46 PM) we need an OLB as well. if we don't land a QB i'd like to see OLB adn O-line with 2 of our top 3 picks
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 08:16 PM) I agree on Deck, not a true #1 and he's had a checkered history with injuries. Marshall has 2, maybe 3 productive years left, which is why Cooper is an option
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 08:17 PM) And I agree with you on edge rusher & OL being bigger needs, but there really isn't a lineman I'd take at 6
Chadforpresi... Icon : (22 April 2015 - 08:19 PM) So the way I see it, assuming Winston and Mariota are taken when we're at 6, that Fowler and Cooper are our best choices, and I'd be stunned if Fowler drops. I wouldn't be surprised (or upset) if we land Cooper
NJAzrael71 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 08:47 PM) Apparently Tennessee wanted both of Cleveland's #1's and their 2nd rounder to move up to the #2 spot to get Mariota. Still think two 1st rounders are too much for Rivers? He makes us instant contenders and if we make a deep playoff run, it would really be this year's 1st and what equates to basically a 2nd rounder next year.
If not, get Cooper in the 1st and then grab Hundley in the 2nd and O-line in the 3rd.
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:05 PM) I wouldn't be upset with Cooper, hes a stud
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:06 PM) Not sure about Ray. Dupree is rising on the draft boards, ridiculously athletic for his size
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:07 PM) Dupree is 6'4 270 and has a amazing get off and runs a 4.5
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:09 PM) Problem is he doesn't have big sack numbers in college, I rather draft a productive guy high
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:09 PM) Vic Beasley is insanely athletic as well and was hugely productive in college, good bet is that Beasley will be a 10+ sack guy in the NFL
NJAzrael71 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:12 PM) Beasley should be a stud but he gets caught up hand fighting if he doesn't beat his guy quickly. He'll likely end up as an OLB but we'll see
Jetsfan0099 Icon : (22 April 2015 - 10:15 PM) He'd be a good fit in our defense, because we could use that speed guy on the outside
Chadforpresi... Icon : (23 April 2015 - 06:27 AM) I'd love Rivers, but we should be able to get him without paying 2 first rounders
Chadforpresi... Icon : (23 April 2015 - 06:29 AM) Lot of buzz about Dupree going top 10, most mocks I see have us getting either Ray or Dupree at 6. I prefer Dupree, like you said insane athlete for his size
Chadforpresi... Icon : (23 April 2015 - 06:30 AM) I like Beasley as well but I have a strong feeling Washington will snag him. But he is a small dude, it'd be nice if he'd add some bulk (in Clemson reportedly played around 230)
Chaos Icon : (23 April 2015 - 10:11 AM) @ArifHasanNFL

.@LanceZierlein says on http://sports790.com that Shane Ray will need surgery on foot, 5 months recovery. "Could drop out of first"
Chaos Icon : (23 April 2015 - 10:14 AM) this should change up the top 10
Chadforpresi... Icon : (23 April 2015 - 12:16 PM) Damn that's big. If he drops out of round 1 that could be a massive bargain for whoever gets him round 2. Dupree now looks more like the edge rusher we'd get at 6
MikeGangGree... Icon : (Yesterday, 09:40 PM) TEH RANGERS
santana Icon : (Yesterday, 11:32 PM) TEH WIZ
Resize Shouts Area

Page 1 of 1

Jets Qb Shuffle - Vick In, Sanchez Out

#1 User is offline   Roenoe17 Icon

  • Free Agent
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 35
  • Joined: 30-March 05

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 March 2014 - 07:03 PM

The Jets’ quarterback picture underwent a dramatic makeover Friday evening.
The team signed Michael Vick and released Mark Sanchez, making two moves that have been rumored for weeks.
Vick, who visited with the Jets on Friday, signed a one-year, $5 million contract, according to ESPN.
The 33-year-old knows Jets offensive coordinator Marty Mornhinweg well from their four years together with the Eagles. He was considered the top free-agent quarterback available. The Jets expect him to back up Geno Smith and possibly challenge him for the job.
With a new quarterback on the roster, the team released the former starter Sanchez.
“I’d like to thank Mark for everything he’s done for this team and me personally,” coach Rex Ryan said in a statement issued by the team. “We were rookies together and had some early success, becoming the first rookie head coach and quarterback to go to back-to-back championship games. We experienced a lot together and I really appreciate Mark. He’s a great player, a great teammate, and I wish him nothing but the best.”
Sanchez was drafted No. 5 overall by the team in 2009 and helped the team to appearances in the AFC Championship Game in his first two seasons. But things went south after that.
Sanchez committed a total of 52 turnovers combined in 2011 and 2012. He endured the team trading for Tim Tebow and then drafting Geno Smith last year to challenge him for the job.
Ryan made the strange decision of putting Sanchez in during the fourth quarter of a preseason game against the Giants behind a backup offensive line. Sanchez was hit by defensive lineman Marvin Austin and injured his shoulder. The torn labrum in his right shoulder required surgery, forcing him to miss the entire season.
The Jets had to make a move with Sanchez before Monday. If he remained on the roster on Tuesday, he would have been due a $2 million roster bonus. By releasing Sanchez, the Jets clear $8.3 million in salary cap space.
0

#2 User is offline   Chaos Icon

  • D Coordinator
  • Icon
  • Group: Assistant Admin
  • Posts: 3,157
  • Joined: 30-March 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 March 2014 - 07:45 PM

Shuffle or circus or whatever way the media spins it, this had to happen. Idzik wasn't going to risk Sanchez beating Geno this summer. Vick has experience with MM. It was too obvious that Sanchez was being held as the last hope if the Jets couldn't sign another vet as back up. Best part? Vick signed for a one year deal.

New plan! Draft a QB late in the draft (Fales?) and cut Simms. Go into the season with Geno, Vick, rookie. Develop the rookie and he replaces Vick as #2 next year as Geno (hopefully) solidifies himself as #1.
0

#3 User is offline   Roger Vick Icon

  • Free Agent
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 31-December 12

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 March 2014 - 07:54 PM

Hide Your Pet, Vick's A Jet!
0

#4 User is offline   Jetsfan0099 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 17,113
  • Joined: 30-July 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Jersey

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 March 2014 - 08:07 PM

If Vick starts, I have confidence in him to get it done. Hes a exciting player that will make big plays and can win games. He gets injured too easily though. But as a backup? Awesome move, if our starter went down he can come in and win.

But I don't think it's a lock that Geno starts, I think Vick could easily out play him this summer. Geno has to bring it, now this is going to push him to become a better QB, if not well then he wasn't our future anyways.
Posted Image
0

#5 User is offline   Jetsfan0099 Icon

  • Assistant Head Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 17,113
  • Joined: 30-July 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Jersey

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 21 March 2014 - 09:29 PM

Get ready for it


Posted Image
0

#6 User is offline   santana Icon

  • I'm batman
  • Icon
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 7,928
  • Joined: 03-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington DC
  • Interests:Keeping this place from breaking... and titties.

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 22 March 2014 - 09:21 AM

VICK = $$$


Nyjetsfan.com Jets Fan Forum and Chat
0

#7 User is offline   santana Icon

  • I'm batman
  • Icon
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 7,928
  • Joined: 03-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington DC
  • Interests:Keeping this place from breaking... and titties.

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 22 March 2014 - 05:58 PM

the hype is real
Nyjetsfan.com Jets Fan Forum and Chat
0

#8 User is offline   ROBJETS Icon

  • LB Coach
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,467
  • Joined: 29-September 05
  • Gender:Male

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 24 March 2014 - 01:22 AM

View PostChaos, on 21 March 2014 - 07:45 PM, said:

Shuffle or circus or whatever way the media spins it, this had to happen. Idzik wasn't going to risk Sanchez beating Geno this summer. Vick has experience with MM. It was too obvious that Sanchez was being held as the last hope if the Jets couldn't sign another vet as back up. Best part? Vick signed for a one year deal.

New plan! Draft a QB late in the draft (Fales?) and cut Simms. Go into the season with Geno, Vick, rookie. Develop the rookie and he replaces Vick as #2 next year as Geno (hopefully) solidifies himself as #1.

I have only one problem with one thing you said.... about risking Sanchez beating Geno out. The rest of what you said was fine but that part was kind of stupid.


Sanchez has been crap every year he has been in the league so even if they did keep him and pay him all kinds of money to be crappy what would be the point. So no is wasn't any kind of risk. Sanchez is what he is and a change of scenery isn't going to change him. Whether Mark is better than Geno or Geno is better than Mark it isn't the point. mark has failed miserably and if not for him being literally carried by the extraordinary team he had around him 4 two years he would have been never got that contract that put us in a mess to begin with.
Marks future is either a great backup qb or a qb brought in to start for a team that has no other chance to get an actual quality qb.

The whole point is it doesn't matter who is better between the two. The fans needed a fresh start and Mark will never be the answer so getting rid of Sanchez and playing Geno or someone else was the only right move period. Keeping Sanchez would have been a circus. If Geno and Sanchez would have both been here healthy it would be a complete circus because if Geno doesn't pan out we would have had two mediocre qb`s.

As far as Vick I have mixed feelings and it has nothing to do with the dog thing.

Vick has sustained a lot of injuries and isn't what he once was. He has a strong arm but not very accurate. Won in Atlanta by his feet alone and in Philly he was surrounded by an explosively fast offense.

I just have doubts he will be able to help this team as much as Jets fans think he can.

No matter what it will be an interesting year and at least we can see light at the end of the tunnel with butt fumble gone. There was no future with Sanchez here starting but now we at least have some hope.
0

#9 User is offline   santana Icon

  • I'm batman
  • Icon
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 7,928
  • Joined: 03-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington DC
  • Interests:Keeping this place from breaking... and titties.

  • NFL Team:

  • MLB:

Posted 24 March 2014 - 01:37 AM

View PostROBJETS, on 24 March 2014 - 02:22 AM, said:

I have only one problem with one thing you said.... about risking Sanchez beating Geno out. The rest of what you said was fine but that part was kind of stupid.

There was no future with Sanchez here starting but now we at least have some hope.



Well to insure that the jets have no future with sanchez he was let go. No reason risking keeping him around and having him beat geno in camp. I don't get your "stupid" comment when you reached the same conclusion.
Nyjetsfan.com Jets Fan Forum and Chat
0

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users