You should really change your name from MNF to WTF because you obviously have no idea. I've said it before & I guess I have to repeat myself again. I'll say it slower so even you can understand me this time.
Check your facts before spewing garbage.
You say Vinny put up Zero points in our game last year. What was that 1 yard TD run he had in the 2nd Qtr at the 3:00 mark? Oh....that's right. It was 6 points. (Ouch....that statement must've just hurt your pride a bit) C'mon. You talk trash saying you were at the game screaming at one of ours. What's the matter. Were you too drunk to emember the game or something?
You state that both of your receivers are top shelf in one sentence and then say they're young & you'll have to wait and see. Put down the bong and make up your mind.
As for Abe wanting a ring.....you better recheck the press release buddy. He said flat out that he signed with the falcons because they gave him the LTD & because his family were in South Carolina.
As for coming close to a ring......the Jets are as close as he's going to get. Remember.....he was within a game of it with us. When's the last time you were with Vick? Mr. Ron Mexico's never had better than a 81.6 QB rating. Even with Pennington's injury plagued seasons, he STILL has a better rating than your "freak".
Ron Mexico's Career Rating: 75.8
Would you like a year to year breakdown? We'll go year for year okay?
2001: Vick 62.7 Chad: 79.6
2002: Vick: 81.6 (Best Year) Chad: 104.2 (Best Year)
2003: Vick: 69.0 Chad: 82.9
2004: Vick: 78.1 Chad: 91.0
2005: Vick: 73.1 Chad: 70.9
HOLY SHIT!!!! ONE YEAR Vick had a better rating. Wow.....what a surprise!!!
Get the f*** out of here trying to talk smack & having NOTHING to back it up. It's pretty damn sad. We already know that Chad won't be the QB we wanted him to be & are prepared to move on. You actually make excuses for Vick saying you fully expect him to sit a few games because that's his style? WTF kind of shit is that?
Winners play hard so they get hurt. Yeah...no shit. Look at Chad. He played hard, got hurt & is still statistically a better QB than your wonder boy. If Vick wants to run so much, let him change to RB & actually let a QB (Schaub) take over the real job. IF that were to happen, then you MAY actually stand a chance of making a little noise in that garbage conference of yours.
Can we say OWNED??????????
Next time you come here looking for a fight, at least come prepared. I hate getting into a battle of wits with an unarmed man.
Dude, dont even pretend that you can spew some numbers, show a flash of wit and think you could EVER own me. The closest youll ever comne to woning ANYTHING is that box of dimoxocillin for that rash you got last week.
Ok, here we go fat boy.You should really change your name from MNF to WTF
because you obviously have no idea. I've said it
before & I guess I have to repeat myself again. I'll
say it slower so even you can understand me this time.
Check your facts before
OK,....I.... think ..... ..I...... . have..... all..... of ..... the ..... facts ...you ...... number ..... spewing, .... no ...... clue .......having, ......hypocrite.
Vinny did RUN in for a touchdown. RUN in. Something that you give Vick no credit for. His running. BUT,
since you suddenly decide that a QB's rushing stats are JUST as relavant as his passing, lets take a look,
shall we? You want a year to year breakdown? Let's do year to year, shall we? ( I can cut and paste numbers too, see!)
Superman (aka Vick)
yr att yrds yrds/per long TD
2001 29 300 10.3 35 1
2002 113 777 6.9 46 8
2003 40 225 6.4 43 1
2004 120 902 7.5 58 3
2005 102 597 5.9 32 6
Your boy CHAD
Year Att Yards Avg. Lg TD
2000 1 0 0 0 0
2001 1 11 11 11 0
2002 29 49 1.7 14 2
2003 21 42 2 10 2
2004 33 126 3.8 16 1
2005 6 27 4.4 14 0
Need I say more? I mean, if your gonna talk shit about Vinny's ONE shining moment in that game, a RUSHING TD (lets not forget the MASSIVE SPIKE he layed down after that, ROFL, i nearly pissed myself) then lets be equally fair and include ALL of Vicks rushing yards when doing a comparison. Add all of Vicks rushing yards in to your little equation and see what happens. I mean, if your gonna base your entire arguement on numbers on paper, then use ALL of the numbers, not just the ones that are convienent for your arguement. (ouch, as you would say, that one must have REALLY hurt your little ego).You state that both of your receivers are top shelf in one sentence and then say they're young & you'll have to wait and see. Put down the bong and make up your mind.
Again, i guess my writing level is at a much higher level than your comprehension, so let me explain. I said our recievers are BAD ASS, i just couldn't argue the point because they dont have the NUMBERS to show it. Remember, thats all you got is numbers, right? THats all you can base an arguement on is numbers on a page without the slightest bit of a clue as to what the f*** you are talking about. Then I said wait and see, they'll shut your fat ass up.
NEXTAs for coming close to a ring......the Jets are as close as he's going to get. Remember.....he was within a game of it with us. When's the last time you were with Vick?
Please, refresh my memory, when exactly was it that the J-E-T-S SUCK SUCK SUCK were in the AFC title game? When was it again? CAuse as far as I can tell, you lost to the Steelers (Nice kicker BTW), the Raiders twice and the Broncos the last time you guys made it into the playoffs. The latter of which put you "One game away" from a ring 8 years ago. VICK, on the other hand, was there two seasons ago (the Philly game, remember? That light bulb coming on yet?). And the season before that we were two games away, so there goes that arguement right down your franchise (aka the toiletbowl). Vick has only started 3 seasons reaching the playoffs in two of them. For you numbers crunchers, that SIXTY-SIX PERCENT (66&) of the time.
Man I could sit here all day and OWN you guys, but I got better shit to do. ANy other bright ideas, go ahead and post em and i'll come back later and pick them apart too.