NYJetsFan.com Forums: ganggreen2003 - Viewing Profile

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox NYJETSFAN BANTER

Jets win 3-1. Beat dolphins so bad that philbin isnt allowed back from england.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (06 October 2015 - 06:37 PM) call em a liar if you want, but I seen it man
santana Icon : (07 October 2015 - 12:52 AM) guess I should enable a character limit for the shoutbox
santana Icon : (07 October 2015 - 12:53 AM) getting a bit out of hand
Jetsman05 Icon : (07 October 2015 - 06:30 AM) Rob you're brutal
MikeGangGree... Icon : (07 October 2015 - 01:30 PM) Who should I start this week in fantasy football? Its a PPR league. I can start 3 of the WRs Edelman-/D-Thomas/Mike Evans/James Jones
MikeGangGree... Icon : (07 October 2015 - 01:30 PM) Edelman and Thomas are must start
MikeGangGree... Icon : (07 October 2015 - 01:31 PM) So do I start Evans against Jax or James Jones vs STL
Jetsfan115 Icon : (07 October 2015 - 01:45 PM) jones. winston likes jackson more then evans
RetireChrebet Icon : (Yesterday, 01:47 PM) My two year old daughter is less manic and is able to maintain her composure much better than someone we know here ....
azjetfan Icon : (Yesterday, 03:07 PM) Dolphins have also fired their DC
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 03:24 PM) I am composed. 115 and I may see things differently but he has never pissed me off. He is just trying to make his point of view and I mine nothing more
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 03:25 PM) I just feel the rule is a very bad rule to give the offense the ball back for losing the ball in the endzone because of a batted ball and feel the NFL is far to offense firendly these days thats all
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 03:27 PM) I know many agree with that. I get that many changes have been made to limit things like brain damage and other injuries some season ending and career ending but defenses cant play hard like they used to and pathetic calls on defenses have ruinbed many games.
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 03:29 PM) Thats why brought up the Jets Fish game. The balls were clearly uncatcahable and a light tug on the jersey shouldn't be a pi. Whatever happened to the uncatchable ball rule?"
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 03:33 PM) and as far as that montage I did have ESPN on for 2 hours after the game because I wanted to see all the reactions and get a clear understanding of this old rule and I never saw a bunch of clips where flags were thrown for the play in question. So I asked for proof. If it was on ESPN it wasn't on ESPN1 maybe ESPN 2 ,3 or news. Its not wrong or brutal to ask for proof when he stated he saw it on ESPN I had the channel on and didn't see what he claimed he saw and still haven't seen any video of proof of his claims
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 03:36 PM) But as I said not mad at all. 115 and I are cool and always have been Ive never been mad at him in anyway. This is a fan forum and we dispute. If we all agreed on everything there would be no point of the forum. Disputes on stats and calls make things interesting, and makes each of use see things from different points of view
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:56 PM) it was on whatever channel the game itself came on
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:56 PM) and for the record I don't have any issue with anything rob said. I just disagree with it
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:57 PM) I do think rules are too offense friendly, but I think in this case, when someone blatently breaks a rule ti should be punished
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:57 PM) but then again pacman got away with ripping off a players helmet and didn't get a penatly
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Yesterday, 03:57 PM) refs need to be more consistent
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 09:04 PM) Hell yeah! Pac 12 AZ State Jaelen Strong. Not a Texans fan but and dont watch a ton of college football but do watch the Pac 12 for football and basketball growing up in Phoenix and also a Suns fan and liking the Cardinals since they moved to AZ .Was a Jets fan though before Az got the cardinals . Strong was really good for AZ State.
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 09:05 PM) Havent studied up on strong for the Texans but will have to since the announcers said he hasnt played much. I want to know if he has been injured or not performing. He has good hands and size
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 09:08 PM) I actually was debating on starting the Colts witth Jets D on bye week glad I dropped them. Wasn't much to choose from. Some decent defenses but bad matchups. took a chance on the Jags this week hoping they can shut down Tampa
ROBJETS Icon : (Yesterday, 09:10 PM) Oh and thanks for that 115. people took it wrong. we were simply debating our opinions with passion for our love of football with no animosity and people took it wrong. Easy to misunderstand texts
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 11:21 AM) yeah people don't realize it's ok to disagree on the internet without it being 2 people hating each other lol
RetireChrebet Icon : (Today, 12:30 PM) I think if the defense touches a live football in the end zone, period, it should be ruled a touchback.
RetireChrebet Icon : (Today, 12:30 PM) Talking about fumbles, not passes, of course.
RetireChrebet Icon : (Today, 12:31 PM) That's the simplest way to combat any confusion about the rule.
RetireChrebet Icon : (Today, 12:32 PM) If you don't like that rule, then don't fumble in the end zone your trying to score in.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 02:21 PM) it's gotta be possession.
RetireChrebet Icon : (Today, 04:03 PM) I know what the rule is. In proposing a rule change. Evidently, the way it is now is too complicated. If a defense touches a live football in the end zone it should be their ball at the 20. Problem solved.
RetireChrebet Icon : (Today, 04:03 PM) I'm*
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 04:44 PM) what if the defense touches it whole trying tor ecover but doens't get it and the offense jumps on it first?
ROBJETS Icon : (Today, 05:56 PM) You may not agree with it 115 but the way I look at it is if the offense recovered it it would be a touchdown. Its ok for a punter, qb, or rb ,etc. to deliberately take a safety so they dont get a punt blocked for a td or to avoid giving the ball up on the 1-2 yard line giving up a near definite td. An also those safeties by the O sometimes saves the game because giving up 2 instead of 7 keeps the game in reach at times.
ROBJETS Icon : (Today, 06:03 PM) Thats why I disagree with the rule. The offense gets the breaks of only giving up 2 points on O. but when fumbkling into the endzone and out it is always ruled a touchback even if the defender or O tries to recoiver the ball in the endzone and the ball goes out of bounds. Thats why I think batting the ball out of the endzone should still be a touchback instead of giving the ball back to the O that fumbled the ball into the endzone. Just dont feel that they should get a chance to get the ball back for an almost automatic td when they fumbled into the endzone just because of a batted ball. Its something that could litterally cause the defense that made a great play to lose simply because of a vbatted ball. Yet if they try to recover it it and it goes out its a touchback. I just feel its to game changing and a bad rule to give the O the ball back after they messed up bad because that play was the difference between a win and loss. The O fumbles so giving the O the ball back is like saying your great def play was worthless.
ROBJETS Icon : (Today, 06:04 PM) Just feel that its a bad rule since it would have almost definitely changed the game winner.
ROBJETS Icon : (Today, 06:08 PM) Just to many good rules for the O these days and to many bad rules for the D. this isn't college where offense dominates in most games. In the pros I want to see an equal playing field and not how its become so offensive friendly. Our own Jets have lost a lot of games on defensive calls alone after stopping the O. 3rd down and a mile and a penalty cost a 1st down and in many cases the game for us. Basically that's why I'm against the rule. I want an equal playing field in the pros nothing more.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 06:26 PM) Offense is in control of the ball, they should have that option. Both teams get to play offense it's not unfiar
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 06:26 PM) a major defensive play is more game changing then a major offensive play too.
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 06:26 PM) turnover ratio is better linked to win/loss then any other stat
Jetsfan115 Icon : (Today, 06:27 PM) even in your case the offense gives up 2 point and posession back with good field position and ball control
ROBJETS Icon : (Today, 06:33 PM) Lets just a agree to disagree on this topic. We both see the situation different and neither of us will budge on this. best we just let it go and see if the NFL starts enforcing the rule more or changes it at some point. Either way. All the coaches and players in the league now know the rule so I doubt it will deliberately happen again any time soon....but then again who knows...in the games there are a lot of stupid fouls out of frustration, taunting, etc.
ROBJETS Icon : (Today, 06:34 PM) And the fans and officials are now aware of a rule almost no one but the officials knew.
ROBJETS Icon : (Today, 06:37 PM) Heck Im upset that we arent 4-0 right now with all thr mistakes against the Eagles and still almost coming back. I feel we need every win we can get especially with the Bills looking decent and always having to deal with the pats every year. Be nice to win the division for once. So tired of seeing the Pats win and get a bye almost every year.
Resize Shouts Area

ganggreen2003's Profile User Rating: ***--

Reputation: 0 Neutral
Active Posts:
1,262(0.33 per day)
Most Active In:
Jets Huddle Archive (639 posts)
30-March 05
Profile Views:
Last Active:
User is offline Oct 05 2015 05:49 PM

Previous Fields

NFL Team:
New York Jets
Washington Nationals

Latest Visitors

Icon   ganggreen2003 J! E! T! S! JETS JETS JETS!!!! J! E! T! S! JETS JETS JETS!!!! J! E! T! S! JETS JETS JETS!!!! J! E! T! S! JETS JETS JETS!!!!

Topics I've Started

  1. Jets Tender Rfa "snacks" And Jarrett

    Posted 11 Mar 2015

    JETS Tender RFA "Snacks" and Jarrett

    Jets tender restricted free agents Damon Harrison, Jaiquawn Jarrett. So what does that mean?
    Damon Harrison
    The Jets have tendered Damon Harrison. (Jeff Haynes | AP Images for Panini)
    Darryl Slater | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com By Darryl Slater | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com
    Email the author | Follow on Twitter
    on March 09, 2015 at 8:23 PM, updated March 10, 2015 at 2:26 PM

    The Jets on Monday announced that they have tendered restricted free agents Damon Harrison and Jaiquawn Jarrett.

    Harrison, a former undrafted player, is the Jets' starting nose tackle. He has been with the team since his NFL career began in 2012. Jarrett, a former second-round pick by the Eagles, has mostly been a backup safety since he joined the Jets in 2013. They were the Jets' only restricted free agents this offseason.

    The Jets gave Harrison a second-round tender. They gave Jarrett something they labeled an "original" tender.

    Confused? Here's what it all means:

    If another team wants to sign Harrison, and the Jets decide not to match what that team offers him, the Jets would get a second-round draft pick in return, upon Harrison's departure. The pick would be for this year's draft, as is the case with all restricted free agent compensation every year. Harrison got a standard second-round tender.

    Teams aren't allowed to tender two restricted free agents in the same round in the same year. Even though Jarrett was originally drafted in the second round, the Jets couldn't give him a second-round restricted free agent tender, and then do the same for Harrison. So if Jarrett is signed away from the Jets, after they decide not to match what another team offers, the Jets would get a third-round pick in return, not a second-rounder.

    The only way the Jets could've given Jarrett a true second-round tender is if they gave Harrison a first-round tender or the low tender. And they weren't going to give him the low tender -- the third and cheapest rung on the restricted free agent tender ladder. (More on that in a second.)

    So what is a tender? It's really just a one-year contract offer. The first-round tender is worth $3.354 million, the second-round tender is worth $2.356 million, and the low tender is worth $1.542 million. Here's a more detailed explanation of the restricted free agent process. The first-round tender is (obviously) attached to a first-round pick in return, as compensation for a departing restricted free agent. The low tender is attached to a pick of whatever round the player was initially drafted in.

    In short, if Harrison signs his tender with the Jets, he will play 2015 on a one-year contract worth $2.356 million. If Jarrett signs his tender, he will get a one-year, $1.542 million contract. So Jarrett essentially received the low tender, with the only difference being that the Jets will get a third-round pick back if he leaves for another team, not a second-round pick.

    Basically, the Jets wanted to save about $1 million while retaining Harrison. That's why they didn't give him the first-round tender. They are banking on another team not wanting to give up a second-round pick for Harrison, who is more valuable to the Jets than Jarrett. The Jets weren't going to give Harrison the low tender, as we mentioned above. That would make no sense, because he was an undrafted player, and so they wouldn't get any pick in return if he left them.

    In Jarrett's case, the Jets are banking on another team not wanting to give up a third-round pick for him. The upshot: It seems unlikely that another team would do this, so expect Jarrett to return to the Jets next season. Ditto for Harrison, who is a very good player, but probably not worth another team giving the Jets a second-round pick.

    In terms of pay increases, Jarrett made $570,000 last season, so he is in position to get about a $1 million raise, if he signs his $1.542 million tender. And Harrison also made $570,000 in 2014, so that'll be an even bigger raise, to his $2.356 million tender.

    So what's a restricted free agent, anyway? And what comes next for Harrison and Jarrett?

    As colleague Dom Cosentino so astutely noted in this post, a restricted free agent is any player with an expiring contract who has three accrued seasons, but less than four accrued seasons.

    Restricted free agents are free to sign with any other team, except not entirely free. By Tuesday at 4 p.m., a restricted free agent's current team can tender a qualifying offer that would entitle that team to a right of first refusal on any offers made by another team, as well as compensation if the restricted free agent were to sign with that other team. (This is exactly what the Jets did Monday.)

    Any restricted free agent tendered an offer sheet -- which is what the Jets gave Harrison and Jarrett on Monday -- has until April 24 to sign, and that player's current team has until April 29 to exercise its right of first refusal on any offer sheet the player may get from another team.

    Darryl Slater may be reached at dslater@njadvancemedia.com. Follow him on Twitter @DarrylSlater. Find NJ.com Jets on Facebook.

    2015 NJ.com. All rights reserved.

    This could mean the SONS might be short 1 member!
  2. March 19Th Decision On Percy Harvin

    Posted 5 Feb 2015

    NYJ March 19th decision

    There will be a lot of speculation in the coming weeks about the future of wide receiver Percy Harvin, who arrived last October in a trade with the Seattle Seahawks.

    The New York Jets face a multilayered decision, one that will be based primarily on his contract ($10.5 million in 2015) and the draft-pick compensation they will owe the Seahawks to complete last October's trade.

    Here's what you need to know:

    The key date is March 19.

    If Harvin remains on the Jets' roster after 4 p.m. on the 10th day of the league year (March 19), the Jets must give their fourth-round draft pick to the Seahawks. If the Jets release him before then, they owe the Seahawks a sixth-round choice.

    The Jets were smart to make it March 19. Two reasons:

    It gives them nine days to explore wide-receiver options in free agency. If they find a better player than Harvin, they can sign that player, cut Harvin and retain their fourth-round pick. The date also gives them leverage in any renegotiation talks with Harvin. If the Jets want to re-work his deal and he declines, the team can keep him until March 18, meaning he'd miss the first wave of free agency -- when the big money is doled out.

    If the Jets keep Harvin on the roster beyond the deadline, it doesn't guarantee his $10.5-million base salary and it wouldn't preclude them from cutting him at a later date. But looking at it from a practical standpoint, it wouldn't make sense to dump a player after committing a fourth-round pick.

    What if the Jets try to circumvent the draft-pick upgrade by cutting him before March 19 and re-signing him at a later date? Sorry, that won't work. In other words, if they cut him March 18 and re-sign him at any point before the second day of the draft (May 1), they owe a fourth-rounder to the Seahawks.

    In terms of the financials, Harvin's contract no longer contains any guaranteed money, meaning there would be no salary-cap ramifications if they decide to part ways. His salaries after 2015 are $9.9 million, $9.95 million and $11.15 million.

    Basically, it's a year-to-year contract, so what the Jets have to decide is this: Do they give up a sixth-round pick for the half-year he gave them in 2014 or do they surrender a fourth-rounder for a minimum of 1 1/2 years?

    Interesting decision.

    Well this will be one of the first major decisions that Maccagnan and Bowles need to make this offseason. What do you think will happen? I think they will rather give up a 6th rounder over a 4th rounder for him. He did have an impact on this O in the time he was on the team, but now is the time to see if he even wants to be here under the new regime and a new offensive scheme with Gailey...should be interesting to say the least!
  3. An Absolute Disgrace

    Posted 2 Feb 2015


    So after the CHEATriots went and won the SB last night when Seattle decided to throw the ball on 2nd & Goal instead of trying to run it in that would of led to a Seahawk W, the Empire State Building, one of the most iconic buildings in the NYC skyline was lit up in the CHEATriot colors to "celebrate" their Super Bowl victory. That is a complete DISGRACE!

    Posted Image
  4. Who Should Get The Blame For The 2014 Season

    Posted 23 Dec 2014

    So as we are about to end this horrible 2014 JETS season. Who is to blame the most for this disaster. Take the Poll and then explain yourself why you voted how you did.

    My vote goes to the guy who I was willing to give a pass earlier in the season but damnit he proved me wrong with his ineptness at the General Manager position. So my vote goes to John Idzik.
  5. Studs Vs. Duds

    Posted 14 Dec 2014

    JETS fans who endure this shit week in week out

    Walker for not lateraling it back before getting knocked out of bounds or not breaking it back to the middle of the field.
    JETS for Winning when Losing would do more good than harm.
    Rex for calling out JETS fans that are looking towards the future since the 2014 season is almost over and he will be put out of his misery as HC of the New York JETS

My Information

Member Title:
38 years old
January 31, 1977
West Warwick, RI

Contact Information

AIM  yankees2805
Website URL:
Website URL  http://www.youtube.com/user/guinness3310


ganggreen2003 hasn't added any friends yet.


ganggreen2003 has no profile comments yet. Why not say hello?